Brandt Bertrand, Pablo Luis Hernández Adame, Carlos Munoz-Garay
{"title":"How Useful are Antimicrobial Peptide Properties for Predicting Activity, Selectivity, and Potency?","authors":"Brandt Bertrand, Pablo Luis Hernández Adame, Carlos Munoz-Garay","doi":"10.2174/0113892037317887240625054710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are recognized for their potential application as new generation antibiotics, however, up to date, they have not been widely commercialized as expected. Although current bioinformatic tools can predict antimicrobial activity based on only amino acid sequences with astounding accuracy, peptide selectivity and potency are not foreseeable. This, in turn, creates a bottleneck not only in the discovery and isolation of promising candidates but, most importantly, in the design and development of novel synthetic peptides. In this paper, we discuss the challenges faced when trying to predict peptide selectivity and potency, based on peptide sequence, structure and relevant biophysical properties such as length, net charge and hydrophobicity. Here, pore-forming alpha-helical antimicrobial peptides family isolated from anurans was used as the case study. Our findings revealed no congruent relationship between the predicted peptide properties and reported microbial assay data, such as minimum inhibitory concentrations against microorganisms and hemolysis. In many instances, the peptides with the best physicochemical properties performed poorly against microbial strains. In some cases, the predicted properties were so similar that differences in activity amongst peptides of the same family could not be projected. Our general conclusion is that antimicrobial peptides of interest must be carefully examined since there is no universal strategy for accurately predicting their behavior.</p>","PeriodicalId":10859,"journal":{"name":"Current protein & peptide science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current protein & peptide science","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0113892037317887240625054710","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are recognized for their potential application as new generation antibiotics, however, up to date, they have not been widely commercialized as expected. Although current bioinformatic tools can predict antimicrobial activity based on only amino acid sequences with astounding accuracy, peptide selectivity and potency are not foreseeable. This, in turn, creates a bottleneck not only in the discovery and isolation of promising candidates but, most importantly, in the design and development of novel synthetic peptides. In this paper, we discuss the challenges faced when trying to predict peptide selectivity and potency, based on peptide sequence, structure and relevant biophysical properties such as length, net charge and hydrophobicity. Here, pore-forming alpha-helical antimicrobial peptides family isolated from anurans was used as the case study. Our findings revealed no congruent relationship between the predicted peptide properties and reported microbial assay data, such as minimum inhibitory concentrations against microorganisms and hemolysis. In many instances, the peptides with the best physicochemical properties performed poorly against microbial strains. In some cases, the predicted properties were so similar that differences in activity amongst peptides of the same family could not be projected. Our general conclusion is that antimicrobial peptides of interest must be carefully examined since there is no universal strategy for accurately predicting their behavior.
期刊介绍:
Current Protein & Peptide Science publishes full-length/mini review articles on specific aspects involving proteins, peptides, and interactions between the enzymes, the binding interactions of hormones and their receptors; the properties of transcription factors and other molecules that regulate gene expression; the reactions leading to the immune response; the process of signal transduction; the structure and function of proteins involved in the cytoskeleton and molecular motors; the properties of membrane channels and transporters; and the generation and storage of metabolic energy. In addition, reviews of experimental studies of protein folding and design are given special emphasis. Manuscripts submitted to Current Protein and Peptide Science should cover a field by discussing research from the leading laboratories in a field and should pose questions for future studies. Original papers, research articles and letter articles/short communications are not considered for publication in Current Protein & Peptide Science.