Geographic Access to Urogynecology Care in the United States.

Pub Date : 2024-07-08 DOI:10.1097/SPV.0000000000001547
Eleanor M Schmidt, Lucy Ward, W Thomas Gregory, Sara B Cichowski
{"title":"Geographic Access to Urogynecology Care in the United States.","authors":"Eleanor M Schmidt, Lucy Ward, W Thomas Gregory, Sara B Cichowski","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Although access to urogynecologic care is known to influence patient outcomes, less is known regarding geographic access to care and how it may vary by population characteristics.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary objective of this study was to estimate geographic accessibility of urogynecologic services in terms of drive time and by population demographics.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We performed a descriptive study using practice location data by zip code for all board-certified urogynecologists who are American Urogynecologic Society members (n = 497) and pelvic floor physical therapists (n = 985). Drive times from each zip code to the nearest health care professional zip code were calculated. These data were then overlaid onto a map of the continental United States. Race/ethnicity, age, education, poverty status, disability status, health insurance coverage, and rurality were compared across travel times.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 31,754 zip codes of the continental United States, 389 (1.23%) had at least 1 urogynecologist, and 785 (2.47%) had at least 1 pelvic floor physical therapist; 92.29 million women older than 35 years were represented in the demographic analyses. Seventy-nine percent of the studied population live within 1 hour of a urogynecologist, and 85% live within 1 hour of a pelvic floor physical therapist. Seven percent and 3% live >2 hours from urogynecologic services, respectively. Values for drive times to all health care professionals indicate that American Indian/Alaska Native individuals have a much greater travel burden than other racial/ethnic groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There are population groups with limited geographic access to urogynecologic services. Pelvic floor physical therapists are more geographically accessible to the population studied than urogynecologists.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001547","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Although access to urogynecologic care is known to influence patient outcomes, less is known regarding geographic access to care and how it may vary by population characteristics.

Objective: The primary objective of this study was to estimate geographic accessibility of urogynecologic services in terms of drive time and by population demographics.

Study design: We performed a descriptive study using practice location data by zip code for all board-certified urogynecologists who are American Urogynecologic Society members (n = 497) and pelvic floor physical therapists (n = 985). Drive times from each zip code to the nearest health care professional zip code were calculated. These data were then overlaid onto a map of the continental United States. Race/ethnicity, age, education, poverty status, disability status, health insurance coverage, and rurality were compared across travel times.

Results: Of the 31,754 zip codes of the continental United States, 389 (1.23%) had at least 1 urogynecologist, and 785 (2.47%) had at least 1 pelvic floor physical therapist; 92.29 million women older than 35 years were represented in the demographic analyses. Seventy-nine percent of the studied population live within 1 hour of a urogynecologist, and 85% live within 1 hour of a pelvic floor physical therapist. Seven percent and 3% live >2 hours from urogynecologic services, respectively. Values for drive times to all health care professionals indicate that American Indian/Alaska Native individuals have a much greater travel burden than other racial/ethnic groups.

Conclusions: There are population groups with limited geographic access to urogynecologic services. Pelvic floor physical therapists are more geographically accessible to the population studied than urogynecologists.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
美国泌尿妇科医疗服务的地理分布。
重要性:众所周知,泌尿妇科医疗服务的可及性影响着患者的治疗效果,但人们对医疗服务的地理可及性以及不同人口特征的可及性却知之甚少:研究设计:研究设计:我们对所有获得美国泌尿妇科协会会员资格的泌尿妇科医生(497 人)和盆底物理治疗师(985 人)进行了描述性研究,使用了按邮政编码划分的执业地点数据。计算了从每个邮政编码到最近的医疗保健专业邮政编码的行车时间。然后将这些数据叠加到美国大陆地图上。将种族/民族、年龄、教育程度、贫困状况、残疾状况、医疗保险覆盖率和乡村地区与不同的行车时间进行比较:在美国大陆的 31754 个邮政编码中,389 个(1.23%)至少有一名泌尿妇科医生,785 个(2.47%)至少有一名盆底物理治疗师;9229 万名 35 岁以上的女性参与了人口统计分析。研究对象中有 79% 的人居住在距离泌尿妇科医生 1 小时路程以内的地方,85% 的人居住在距离盆底物理治疗师 1 小时路程以内的地方。分别有 7% 和 3% 的人距离泌尿妇科服务机构超过 2 小时车程。前往所有医疗保健专业人员的车程时间值表明,美国印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民的旅行负担远大于其他种族/族裔群体:结论:有些人群获得泌尿妇科服务的地理位置有限。与泌尿妇科专家相比,盆底物理治疗师在地理位置上更容易接近所研究的人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1