The Effects of Monetary Policy on Capital Flows: An Emerging Market Survey

IF 5.6 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Emerging Markets Review Pub Date : 2024-07-05 DOI:10.1016/j.ememar.2024.101167
Mauricio Villamizar-Villegas , Lucía Arango-Lozano , Geraldine Castelblanco , Nicolás Fajardo-Baquero , Maria A. Ruiz-Sanchez
{"title":"The Effects of Monetary Policy on Capital Flows: An Emerging Market Survey","authors":"Mauricio Villamizar-Villegas ,&nbsp;Lucía Arango-Lozano ,&nbsp;Geraldine Castelblanco ,&nbsp;Nicolás Fajardo-Baquero ,&nbsp;Maria A. Ruiz-Sanchez","doi":"10.1016/j.ememar.2024.101167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We investigate whether central banks from emerging markets can attract or redirect capital flows, by bringing together the entire empirical literature into the first quan- titative meta-analysis. We dissect policy effects based on the origin of the monetary shock and type of flow. Further, we assess whether policy effects depend on factors that drive investors to either search for yields or fly to safety. Our findings indicate a mean effect size of inflows in the amount of 0.09% of quarterly GDP in response to either a 100-basis point (bp) increase in the domestic policy rate or a 100 bp reduction in the external rate. However, the effect size under a fixed effect specification is much higher (0.2%). Factors that attract inflows include output growth, foreign exchange reserves, and a more flexible exchange rate regime, while factors that deter flows include local and global risks. Finally, we find that banking flows are the most responsive to monetary policy, while foreign direct investments are the least responsive.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47886,"journal":{"name":"Emerging Markets Review","volume":"62 ","pages":"Article 101167"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emerging Markets Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1566014124000621","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We investigate whether central banks from emerging markets can attract or redirect capital flows, by bringing together the entire empirical literature into the first quan- titative meta-analysis. We dissect policy effects based on the origin of the monetary shock and type of flow. Further, we assess whether policy effects depend on factors that drive investors to either search for yields or fly to safety. Our findings indicate a mean effect size of inflows in the amount of 0.09% of quarterly GDP in response to either a 100-basis point (bp) increase in the domestic policy rate or a 100 bp reduction in the external rate. However, the effect size under a fixed effect specification is much higher (0.2%). Factors that attract inflows include output growth, foreign exchange reserves, and a more flexible exchange rate regime, while factors that deter flows include local and global risks. Finally, we find that banking flows are the most responsive to monetary policy, while foreign direct investments are the least responsive.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
货币政策对资本流动的影响:新兴市场调查
我们将所有实证文献汇集在一起,首次进行了量化元分析,从而研究新兴市场的中央银行能否吸引或引导资本流动。我们根据货币冲击的来源和资本流动的类型来分析政策效果。此外,我们还评估了政策效应是否取决于促使投资者寻求收益或飞向安全地带的因素。我们的研究结果表明,在国内政策利率上调 100 个基点或外部利率下调 100 个基点的情况下,流入资金的平均效应规模为季度国内生产总值的 0.09%。然而,固定效应规格下的效应规模要高得多(0.2%)。吸引资金流入的因素包括产出增长、外汇储备和更灵活的汇率制度,而阻碍资金流入的因素包括本地和全球风险。最后,我们发现银行资金流动对货币政策的反应最为灵敏,而外国直接投资的反应最小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
85
审稿时长
100 days
期刊介绍: The intent of the editors is to consolidate Emerging Markets Review as the premier vehicle for publishing high impact empirical and theoretical studies in emerging markets finance. Preference will be given to comparative studies that take global and regional perspectives, detailed single country studies that address critical policy issues and have significant global and regional implications, and papers that address the interactions of national and international financial architecture. We especially welcome papers that take institutional as well as financial perspectives.
期刊最新文献
From framing to priming: How does media coverage promote ESG preferences of institutional investors Disruptive technology and audit risks: Evidence from FTSE 100 companies Will Southeast Asia be the next global manufacturing hub? A multiway cointegration, causality, and dynamic connectedness analyses Climate policy and China's external balances International financial integration and financial stress of emerging market economies: The role of institutional quality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1