Comparing net zero pathways across the Atlantic A model inter-comparison exercise between the Energy Modeling Forum 37 and the European Climate and Energy Modeling Forum

IF 5.8 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS Energy and climate change Pub Date : 2024-07-06 DOI:10.1016/j.egycc.2024.100144
Luis Sarmiento , Johannes Emmerling , Robert Pietzcker , Vassilis Daioglou , Francesco Dalla Longa , Mark M. Dekker , Laurent Drouet , Amir Fattahi , Panagiotis Fragkos , Hauke T. J. Henke , Oliver Fricko , Leonard Göke , Volker Krey , Ellie Lochner , Gunnar Luderer , Nick Macaluso , Kowan T. V. O'Keefe , Kathleen M. Kennedy , Gokul Iyer , Renato Rodrigues , Behnam Zakeri
{"title":"Comparing net zero pathways across the Atlantic A model inter-comparison exercise between the Energy Modeling Forum 37 and the European Climate and Energy Modeling Forum","authors":"Luis Sarmiento ,&nbsp;Johannes Emmerling ,&nbsp;Robert Pietzcker ,&nbsp;Vassilis Daioglou ,&nbsp;Francesco Dalla Longa ,&nbsp;Mark M. Dekker ,&nbsp;Laurent Drouet ,&nbsp;Amir Fattahi ,&nbsp;Panagiotis Fragkos ,&nbsp;Hauke T. J. Henke ,&nbsp;Oliver Fricko ,&nbsp;Leonard Göke ,&nbsp;Volker Krey ,&nbsp;Ellie Lochner ,&nbsp;Gunnar Luderer ,&nbsp;Nick Macaluso ,&nbsp;Kowan T. V. O'Keefe ,&nbsp;Kathleen M. Kennedy ,&nbsp;Gokul Iyer ,&nbsp;Renato Rodrigues ,&nbsp;Behnam Zakeri","doi":"10.1016/j.egycc.2024.100144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Europe and North America account for 32 % of current carbon emissions. Due to distinct legacy systems, energy infrastructure, socioeconomic development, and energy resource endowment, both regions have different policy and technological pathways to reach net zero by the mid-century. Against this background, our paper examines the results from the net zero emission scenarios for Europe and North America that emerged from the collaboration of the European and American Energy Modeling Forums. In our analysis, we perform an inter-comparison of various integrated assessments and bottom-up energy system models. A clear qualitative consensus emerges on five main points. First, Europe and the United States reach net zero targets with electrification, demand-side reductions, and carbon capture and sequestration technologies. Second, the use of carbon capture and sequestration is more predominant in the United States due to a steeper decarbonization schedule. Third, the buildings sector is the easiest to electrify in both regions. Fourth, the industrial sector is the hardest to electrify in the United States and transportation in Europe.</p><p>Fifth, in both regions, the transition in the energy mix is driven by the substitution of coal and natural gas with solar and wind, but to a different extent.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72914,"journal":{"name":"Energy and climate change","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy and climate change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666278724000205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Europe and North America account for 32 % of current carbon emissions. Due to distinct legacy systems, energy infrastructure, socioeconomic development, and energy resource endowment, both regions have different policy and technological pathways to reach net zero by the mid-century. Against this background, our paper examines the results from the net zero emission scenarios for Europe and North America that emerged from the collaboration of the European and American Energy Modeling Forums. In our analysis, we perform an inter-comparison of various integrated assessments and bottom-up energy system models. A clear qualitative consensus emerges on five main points. First, Europe and the United States reach net zero targets with electrification, demand-side reductions, and carbon capture and sequestration technologies. Second, the use of carbon capture and sequestration is more predominant in the United States due to a steeper decarbonization schedule. Third, the buildings sector is the easiest to electrify in both regions. Fourth, the industrial sector is the hardest to electrify in the United States and transportation in Europe.

Fifth, in both regions, the transition in the energy mix is driven by the substitution of coal and natural gas with solar and wind, but to a different extent.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较大西洋两岸的净零路径 能源建模论坛 37 与欧洲气候和能源建模论坛之间的模型相互比较活动
欧洲和北美占目前碳排放量的 32%。由于传统系统、能源基础设施、社会经济发展和能源资源禀赋各不相同,这两个地区在本世纪中叶实现净零排放的政策和技术途径也不尽相同。在此背景下,我们的论文研究了欧洲和北美能源建模论坛合作提出的净零排放方案的结果。在分析中,我们对各种综合评估和自下而上的能源系统模型进行了相互比较。我们在五个要点上达成了明确的定性共识。首先,欧洲和美国通过电气化、减少需求侧以及碳捕集与封存技术实现了净零目标。其次,由于去碳化的时间表更陡峭,碳捕集与封存技术的使用在美国更占优势。第三,在这两个地区,建筑部门最容易实现电气化。第四,在美国,工业部门最难电气化,而在欧洲,交通部门最难电气化。第五,在这两个地区,能源结构的转型都是由太阳能和风能取代煤炭和天然气驱动的,但程度不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy and climate change
Energy and climate change Global and Planetary Change, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparing green hydrogen and green ammonia as energy carriers in utility-scale transport and subsurface storage Global trade of green iron as a game changer for a near-zero global steel industry? - A scenario-based assessment of regionalized impacts Strategic approach to accelerating regional bioenergy development: Bioelectricity for emission reduction and sustainability The role of the pulp and paper industry in achieving net zero U.S. CO2 emissions in 2050 Exploring attitudes and behavioral patterns in residential energy consumption: Data-driven by a machine learning approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1