Adherence to the Mediterranean dietary pattern among workers: a systematic review

Patrícia Leão, M. Rei, Sara Rodrigues
{"title":"Adherence to the Mediterranean dietary pattern among workers: a systematic review","authors":"Patrícia Leão, M. Rei, Sara Rodrigues","doi":"10.1108/nfs-11-2023-0252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to carry out a systematic review based on the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to assess the adherence to the Mediterranean dietary pattern (MDP) in workers.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThree electronic databases were searched up to March 2022. The population was restricted to adults, workers in any professional area, without special diets and no specific health conditions. Their adherence to the MDP was assessed by any a priori method/instrument. Two reviewers independently applied the eligibility criteria and performed the data extraction from each study included. In case of disagreement, a third reviewer was consulted.\n\n\nFindings\nOf the 590 studies found, 46 were included. Most of the studies were carried out in Europe, between the years 2019 and 2022 and were cross-sectional studies. The minimum sample size was 38, and the maximum was 1,74,638 participants. Most studies included both males and females; six included only females and nine only males. The three most prevalent types of workers under study were health professionals, factory workers and firefighters. The most used method for assessing adherence to the MDP was the Mediterranean diet score. Overall, workers showed low or moderate adherence to the MDP.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis systematic review conducted to assess the adherence to the MDP in workers displays an urgent need to improve diet quality in the workplaces.\n","PeriodicalId":509279,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition & Food Science","volume":"7 47","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition & Food Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/nfs-11-2023-0252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to carry out a systematic review based on the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to assess the adherence to the Mediterranean dietary pattern (MDP) in workers. Design/methodology/approach Three electronic databases were searched up to March 2022. The population was restricted to adults, workers in any professional area, without special diets and no specific health conditions. Their adherence to the MDP was assessed by any a priori method/instrument. Two reviewers independently applied the eligibility criteria and performed the data extraction from each study included. In case of disagreement, a third reviewer was consulted. Findings Of the 590 studies found, 46 were included. Most of the studies were carried out in Europe, between the years 2019 and 2022 and were cross-sectional studies. The minimum sample size was 38, and the maximum was 1,74,638 participants. Most studies included both males and females; six included only females and nine only males. The three most prevalent types of workers under study were health professionals, factory workers and firefighters. The most used method for assessing adherence to the MDP was the Mediterranean diet score. Overall, workers showed low or moderate adherence to the MDP. Originality/value This systematic review conducted to assess the adherence to the MDP in workers displays an urgent need to improve diet quality in the workplaces.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
工人坚持地中海饮食模式:系统回顾
目的 本文旨在根据系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南开展一项系统综述,以评估工人对地中海饮食模式(MDP)的坚持情况。研究对象仅限于成年人、任何专业领域的工作者,无特殊饮食习惯,无特殊健康状况。他们是否遵守 MDP 可通过任何先验方法/工具进行评估。两名审稿人独立应用资格标准,并对纳入的每项研究进行数据提取。研究结果在找到的 590 项研究中,有 46 项被纳入。大多数研究都是在欧洲进行的,时间跨度在 2019 年至 2022 年之间,并且都是横断面研究。样本量最少的为 38 人,最多的为 174638 人。大多数研究既包括男性,也包括女性;6 项研究只包括女性,9 项研究只包括男性。研究中最常见的三种工人类型是卫生专业人员、工厂工人和消防员。评估是否坚持地中海饮食计划的最常用方法是地中海饮食评分。总体而言,工人对 MDP 的依从性较低或中等。原创性/价值这项系统综述旨在评估工人对 MDP 的依从性,表明迫切需要改善工作场所的饮食质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Probiotic soy beverages: a functional beverage on lipid profile, oxidative stress and kidney function: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials Probiotic soy beverages: a functional beverage on lipid profile, oxidative stress and kidney function: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials Pharmacological properties and stability of natural–colored foods: a literature review Ashwagandha: botanic occurrence, conventional uses, and significance in heart, metabolic, renal and hepatic disorder Evaluating women’s knowledge about dietary supplement use during pregnancy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1