{"title":"Performance appraisal interval and employee exploratory innovation behavior: the curvilinear relationship and the boundary conditions","authors":"Jun Yang, Bin Wang, Bin Zhao, Jun Ma","doi":"10.1108/jmp-03-2023-0197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeCompressing project timelines represents a prevalent temporal tactic aimed at accelerating the innovation process. However, empirical evidence on the impact of such time constraints on innovation remains inconclusive. This study aims to investigate the relationship between a prevalent organizational time mechanism—Performance Appraisal Interval (PAI)—and employee exploratory innovation behavior. Additionally, we explore the boundary conditions that may influence this relationship: the moderating effects of future work self salience and supervisory developmental feedback.Design/methodology/approachUsing online survey data collected in two waves from 426 employees working in hi-tech companies in China, we tested all the hypotheses.Findings(1) PAI demonstrates an inverted U-shaped influence on employees exploratory innovation behavior; (2) Employees’ future work self salience serves as a moderator that enhances the positive nature of this inverted U-shaped relationship; (3) Supervisory developmental feedback amplifies the moderating role of future work self salience, and the synergistic effect of PAI, future work self salience, and supervisory developmental feedback significantly enhances exploratory innovation behavior.Practical implicationsBy providing insights that are attuned to the temporal aspects of performance appraisal, this study aids organizations in making more informed, strategic decisions that enhance both the effectiveness of performance assessments and the cultivation of an environment that encourages exploratory innovation. Additionally, it is recommended that organizational leaders incorporate future-oriented interventions and developmental feedback into their management practices to further promote employees' engagement in exploratory innovation.Originality/valueDrawing on the interactive theory of performance, this study introduces a novel perspective on how an organizational temporal mechanism influences exploratory innovation and advances our understanding of the non-linear link between time constraints and employees' innovative behaviors.","PeriodicalId":505968,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Managerial Psychology","volume":"87 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Managerial Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jmp-03-2023-0197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
PurposeCompressing project timelines represents a prevalent temporal tactic aimed at accelerating the innovation process. However, empirical evidence on the impact of such time constraints on innovation remains inconclusive. This study aims to investigate the relationship between a prevalent organizational time mechanism—Performance Appraisal Interval (PAI)—and employee exploratory innovation behavior. Additionally, we explore the boundary conditions that may influence this relationship: the moderating effects of future work self salience and supervisory developmental feedback.Design/methodology/approachUsing online survey data collected in two waves from 426 employees working in hi-tech companies in China, we tested all the hypotheses.Findings(1) PAI demonstrates an inverted U-shaped influence on employees exploratory innovation behavior; (2) Employees’ future work self salience serves as a moderator that enhances the positive nature of this inverted U-shaped relationship; (3) Supervisory developmental feedback amplifies the moderating role of future work self salience, and the synergistic effect of PAI, future work self salience, and supervisory developmental feedback significantly enhances exploratory innovation behavior.Practical implicationsBy providing insights that are attuned to the temporal aspects of performance appraisal, this study aids organizations in making more informed, strategic decisions that enhance both the effectiveness of performance assessments and the cultivation of an environment that encourages exploratory innovation. Additionally, it is recommended that organizational leaders incorporate future-oriented interventions and developmental feedback into their management practices to further promote employees' engagement in exploratory innovation.Originality/valueDrawing on the interactive theory of performance, this study introduces a novel perspective on how an organizational temporal mechanism influences exploratory innovation and advances our understanding of the non-linear link between time constraints and employees' innovative behaviors.
目的压缩项目时间表是一种普遍的时间策略,旨在加快创新进程。然而,有关这种时间限制对创新的影响的实证证据仍然没有定论。本研究旨在探讨一种普遍的组织时间机制--绩效评估间隔(PAI)--与员工探索性创新行为之间的关系。此外,我们还探讨了可能影响这种关系的边界条件:未来工作自我显著性和上司发展反馈的调节作用。设计/方法/途径利用分两轮收集到的 426 名中国高科技公司员工的在线调查数据,我们检验了所有假设。结果(1)PAI 对员工探索性创新行为的影响呈倒 U 型;(2)员工的未来工作自我显著性作为调节因子增强了这种倒 U 型关系的正向性质;(3)督导发展反馈放大了未来工作自我显著性的调节作用,PAI、未来工作自我显著性和督导发展反馈的协同效应显著增强了员工的探索性创新行为。实践意义 通过提供与绩效评估的时间性相适应的见解,本研究有助于组织做出更加明智的战略决策,从而提高绩效评估的有效性,并营造一个鼓励探索性创新的环境。此外,本研究还建议组织领导者在其管理实践中纳入面向未来的干预措施和发展反馈,以进一步促进员工参与探索性创新。原创性/价值本研究以绩效互动理论为基础,从一个新颖的角度介绍了组织时间机制如何影响探索性创新,并加深了我们对时间限制与员工创新行为之间非线性联系的理解。