{"title":"Unraveling Endogeneity: A Systematic Review of Methodologies in Digital Leadership and Remote Work Research","authors":"Ahmed M. Asfahani, Dina Dahlan, Maysaa Alnajem","doi":"10.34190/ejbrm.22.2.3279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the evolving landscape of digital leadership and remote work, methodological challenges, particularly endogeneity, have emerged as significant concerns. Endogeneity, which arises when independent variables correlate with regression error terms, can introduce biases that compromise the validity of research findings. This systematic review examines the methodological underpinnings of research in digital leadership and remote work, focusing on how studies have addressed or overlooked the challenges posed by endogeneity. Drawing from 45 seminal articles published between 2019 and 2023, the review reveals a predominant preference for quantitative approaches, with a subset exploring qualitative narratives. While 15 studies directly tackled endogeneity using rigorous methodologies, 10 did not address it, indicating potential gaps in their investigative rigor. This study not only provides clarity and direction for future research endeavors but also supports the advancement of research methodology in business and management by emphasizing the need for methodological rigor in the study of digital leadership and remote work dynamics. By systematically evaluating the methods used to address endogeneity, this research advances the field of business and management research methodology by identifying best practices and highlighting areas for improvement. Specifically, it advocates for the adoption of advanced econometric techniques, such as instrumental variables and fixed effects models, to mitigate biases and enhance the reliability of research outcomes. Furthermore, this review underscores the importance of integrating both quantitative and qualitative approaches to capture the multifaceted nature of digital leadership and remote work, thereby contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of these domains. The study also highlights the influence of unobserved factors on outcomes such as employee productivity, leadership effectiveness, and team cohesiveness. In sum, this research provides a foundational framework for scholars aiming to enhance the robustness and validity of their studies in digital leadership and remote work, aligning with the broader goals of advancing research methodologies in business and management.","PeriodicalId":38532,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods","volume":"81 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34190/ejbrm.22.2.3279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In the evolving landscape of digital leadership and remote work, methodological challenges, particularly endogeneity, have emerged as significant concerns. Endogeneity, which arises when independent variables correlate with regression error terms, can introduce biases that compromise the validity of research findings. This systematic review examines the methodological underpinnings of research in digital leadership and remote work, focusing on how studies have addressed or overlooked the challenges posed by endogeneity. Drawing from 45 seminal articles published between 2019 and 2023, the review reveals a predominant preference for quantitative approaches, with a subset exploring qualitative narratives. While 15 studies directly tackled endogeneity using rigorous methodologies, 10 did not address it, indicating potential gaps in their investigative rigor. This study not only provides clarity and direction for future research endeavors but also supports the advancement of research methodology in business and management by emphasizing the need for methodological rigor in the study of digital leadership and remote work dynamics. By systematically evaluating the methods used to address endogeneity, this research advances the field of business and management research methodology by identifying best practices and highlighting areas for improvement. Specifically, it advocates for the adoption of advanced econometric techniques, such as instrumental variables and fixed effects models, to mitigate biases and enhance the reliability of research outcomes. Furthermore, this review underscores the importance of integrating both quantitative and qualitative approaches to capture the multifaceted nature of digital leadership and remote work, thereby contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of these domains. The study also highlights the influence of unobserved factors on outcomes such as employee productivity, leadership effectiveness, and team cohesiveness. In sum, this research provides a foundational framework for scholars aiming to enhance the robustness and validity of their studies in digital leadership and remote work, aligning with the broader goals of advancing research methodologies in business and management.
期刊介绍:
The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods (EJBRM) provides perspectives on topics relevant to research methods applied in the field of business and management. Through its publication the journal contributes to the development of theory and practice. The journal accepts academically robust papers that contribute to the area of research methods applied in business and management research. Papers submitted to the journal are double-blind reviewed by members of the reviewer committee or other suitably qualified readers. The Editor reserves the right to reject papers that, in the view of the editorial board, are either of insufficient quality, or are not relevant enough to the subject area. The editor is happy to discuss contributions before submission. The journal publishes work in the categories described below. Research Papers: These may be qualitative or quantitative, empirical or theoretical in nature and can discuss completed research findings or work in progress. Case Studies: Case studies are welcomed illustrating business and management research methods in practise. View Points: View points are less academically rigorous articles usually in areas of controversy which will fuel some interesting debate. Conference Reports and Book Reviews: Anyone who attends a conference or reads a book that they feel contributes to the area of Business Research Methods is encouraged to submit a review for publication.