Trust in Governmental Health Communication on Covid-19

David Schieferdecker, Philippe Joly, Natalie Berger
{"title":"Trust in Governmental Health Communication on Covid-19","authors":"David Schieferdecker, Philippe Joly, Natalie Berger","doi":"10.47368/ejhc.2024.302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Trust in governmental communication is critical to the successful containment of public health crises. However, in highly politicised crises, trust varies as a function of partisanship. This research report examines the relationship between political preferences and trust in governmental health communication during the Covid-19 pandemic in Germany. We pay particular attention to the interaction between (a) different dimensions of vulnerability to the virus and (b) distrust rooted in partisan preferences. Using original data from a representative, four-wave online survey conducted in Germany in 2020 and 2021, we found moderate to low levels of trust in information from the government. Whereas belonging to a vulnerable age group (65+) and fear of infection were significantly associated with trust, identification as a member of a risk group was not. Voters of the right-wing populist AfD were less likely to trust government information. Finally, the association between fear of infection and trust was stronger among AfD voters than among voters of established parties. We conclude that public health campaigns should account for the fact that politicised individuals may not trust communicators in prolonged crises. Messages targeting members of risk groups and partisans of populist parties should make health risks relatable to them as individuals.","PeriodicalId":504966,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Health Communication","volume":"37 32","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Health Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47368/ejhc.2024.302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Trust in governmental communication is critical to the successful containment of public health crises. However, in highly politicised crises, trust varies as a function of partisanship. This research report examines the relationship between political preferences and trust in governmental health communication during the Covid-19 pandemic in Germany. We pay particular attention to the interaction between (a) different dimensions of vulnerability to the virus and (b) distrust rooted in partisan preferences. Using original data from a representative, four-wave online survey conducted in Germany in 2020 and 2021, we found moderate to low levels of trust in information from the government. Whereas belonging to a vulnerable age group (65+) and fear of infection were significantly associated with trust, identification as a member of a risk group was not. Voters of the right-wing populist AfD were less likely to trust government information. Finally, the association between fear of infection and trust was stronger among AfD voters than among voters of established parties. We conclude that public health campaigns should account for the fact that politicised individuals may not trust communicators in prolonged crises. Messages targeting members of risk groups and partisans of populist parties should make health risks relatable to them as individuals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
信任政府在 Covid-19 上进行的健康宣传
对政府沟通的信任是成功控制公共卫生危机的关键。然而,在高度政治化的危机中,信任因党派而异。本研究报告探讨了德国 Covid-19 大流行期间政治偏好与对政府卫生宣传信任之间的关系。我们特别关注了(a)病毒易感性的不同维度与(b)基于党派偏好的不信任之间的相互作用。利用 2020 年和 2021 年在德国进行的具有代表性的四波在线调查的原始数据,我们发现人们对来自政府的信息的信任度为中低水平。属于弱势年龄组(65 岁以上)和害怕感染与信任度有显著关联,而被认定为风险群体成员则与信任度无关。右翼民粹主义者 AfD 的选民对政府信息的信任度较低。最后,非洲民主党选民对感染的恐惧与信任之间的关联要强于传统政党的选民。我们的结论是,公共卫生活动应考虑到政治化的个人在长期危机中可能不信任传播者这一事实。针对风险群体成员和民粹主义政党党派成员的信息应使健康风险与他们个人相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Trust in Governmental Health Communication on Covid-19 Care Pathway of Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Online Patient Work Challenges in Communicating Public Health Data Patients’ Intentions to Use a Physician-Provided Digital Health Information Service
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1