Association between different dietary carbohydrates and risk of gallstone: a case-control study in Iranian adults

Maryam Nilghaz, M. Shahparvari, A. Hekmatdoost, Saeede Saadati, Moloud Ghorbani, Amir Sadeghi, Zahra Yari
{"title":"Association between different dietary carbohydrates and risk of gallstone: a case-control study in Iranian adults","authors":"Maryam Nilghaz, M. Shahparvari, A. Hekmatdoost, Saeede Saadati, Moloud Ghorbani, Amir Sadeghi, Zahra Yari","doi":"10.1108/nfs-12-2023-0299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nDietary components have been mentioned as modifiable risk factors in the development of gallstone disease (GSD), but it has been less addressed. The present study aimed to investigate the potential association between different types of dietary carbohydrate and the risk of gallstone.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nIn this case-control study 189 patients diagnosed with GSD as a case group and 342 people as a control group were enrolled. Dietary intake of the participants was collected through a 168-item semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire. Total intakes of calories, macronutrients and different types of carbohydrate were estimated. Crude and multivariable-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to assess the association between carbohydrate intake and GSD.\n\n\nFindings\nPatients with gallstone consumed significantly more fructose and sucrose and less fiber. After fully adjustment, the logistic regression indicated significant association between GSD with dietary intake of total carbohydrate (OR = 1.65, 95% CI: 1.1–2.4, p = 0.009), sugar (OR = 1.23, 95% CI: 0.8–1.7, p = 0.014), fructose (OR = 2.5, 95% CI: 1.7–3.9, p < 0.001), glucose (OR = 1.9, 95% CI: 1.3–2.9, p = 0.002) and sucrose (OR = 1.37, 95% CI: 0.9–1.6, p = 0.042). Also, increasing intakes of lactose, galactose and maltose were associated with a decrease in the risk of GSD, but not statistically significant, although lactose was close to significance (OR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.48–1, p = 0.051).\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThere is a positive and significant relationship between total carbohydrate, sugar, fructose, glucose and sucrose intake and the occurrence of gallstone.\n","PeriodicalId":509279,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition &amp; Food Science","volume":"10 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition &amp; Food Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/nfs-12-2023-0299","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Dietary components have been mentioned as modifiable risk factors in the development of gallstone disease (GSD), but it has been less addressed. The present study aimed to investigate the potential association between different types of dietary carbohydrate and the risk of gallstone. Design/methodology/approach In this case-control study 189 patients diagnosed with GSD as a case group and 342 people as a control group were enrolled. Dietary intake of the participants was collected through a 168-item semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire. Total intakes of calories, macronutrients and different types of carbohydrate were estimated. Crude and multivariable-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to assess the association between carbohydrate intake and GSD. Findings Patients with gallstone consumed significantly more fructose and sucrose and less fiber. After fully adjustment, the logistic regression indicated significant association between GSD with dietary intake of total carbohydrate (OR = 1.65, 95% CI: 1.1–2.4, p = 0.009), sugar (OR = 1.23, 95% CI: 0.8–1.7, p = 0.014), fructose (OR = 2.5, 95% CI: 1.7–3.9, p < 0.001), glucose (OR = 1.9, 95% CI: 1.3–2.9, p = 0.002) and sucrose (OR = 1.37, 95% CI: 0.9–1.6, p = 0.042). Also, increasing intakes of lactose, galactose and maltose were associated with a decrease in the risk of GSD, but not statistically significant, although lactose was close to significance (OR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.48–1, p = 0.051). Originality/value There is a positive and significant relationship between total carbohydrate, sugar, fructose, glucose and sucrose intake and the occurrence of gallstone.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同膳食碳水化合物与胆石症风险之间的关系:一项针对伊朗成年人的病例对照研究
目的膳食成分被认为是胆石症(GSD)发病的可调节风险因素,但对这一问题的研究较少。本研究旨在调查不同类型的膳食碳水化合物与胆石症风险之间的潜在关联。在这项病例对照研究中,共招募了 189 名确诊为 GSD 的患者作为病例组,342 人作为对照组。研究人员通过一份包含 168 个项目的半定量食物频率问卷收集了参与者的饮食摄入量。对卡路里、常量营养素和不同类型碳水化合物的总摄入量进行了估算。结果胆结石患者摄入的果糖和蔗糖明显较多,而纤维素较少。经过充分调整后,逻辑回归结果表明,GSD 与膳食中碳水化合物总摄入量(OR = 1.65,95% CI:1.1-2.4,P = 0.009)、糖(OR = 1.23,95% CI:0.8-1.7,p = 0.014)、果糖(OR = 2.5,95% CI:1.7-3.9,p <0.001)、葡萄糖(OR = 1.9,95% CI:1.3-2.9,p = 0.002)和蔗糖(OR = 1.37,95% CI:0.9-1.6,p = 0.042)。此外,乳糖、半乳糖和麦芽糖摄入量的增加与 GSD 风险的降低有关,但无统计学意义,尽管乳糖接近显著性(OR = 0.71,95% CI:0.48-1,p = 0.051)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Probiotic soy beverages: a functional beverage on lipid profile, oxidative stress and kidney function: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials Probiotic soy beverages: a functional beverage on lipid profile, oxidative stress and kidney function: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials Pharmacological properties and stability of natural–colored foods: a literature review Ashwagandha: botanic occurrence, conventional uses, and significance in heart, metabolic, renal and hepatic disorder Evaluating women’s knowledge about dietary supplement use during pregnancy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1