Associating reservoir operations with 2D inundation risk and climate uncertainty

Water Supply Pub Date : 2024-07-15 DOI:10.2166/ws.2024.162
Youcan Feng, Run Zheng, Donghe Ma, Xin Huang
{"title":"Associating reservoir operations with 2D inundation risk and climate uncertainty","authors":"Youcan Feng, Run Zheng, Donghe Ma, Xin Huang","doi":"10.2166/ws.2024.162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Bridging the research gap between reservoir operations and inundation risks under the future climate, this study integrates a hydrologic reservoir management model with a 2D hydrodynamic model, comparing the conventional regulatory and the optimized reservoir operations based on the particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm. Results reveal that optimized operations using the PSO algorithm consistently outperform conventional strategies by better-managing peak discharges and controlling downstream inundation. The study further differentiates between PSO-optimized plans: PSO1, which prioritizes peak reduction at the flood control point, and PSO2, which focuses on minimizing inundation areas. Interestingly, PSO2 proves superior for single-point peak reduction, typically the primary objective in current practices, whereas PSO1, despite lesser peak reduction, achieves a smaller inundation area, enhancing basin-scale flood resilience. This discrepancy underscores the need to consider downstream inundation risks as critical evaluation metrics in reservoir optimization, a factor often overlooked in existing studies. The research underscores the importance of updating operational frameworks to incorporate 2D inundation risks and adapt to increased flood risks under changing climate conditions. Despite optimization, future climate scenarios predict increased flood exposure, indicating that the current safety discharge rates and flow regulations at control points are outdated and require revision.","PeriodicalId":509977,"journal":{"name":"Water Supply","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Supply","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2024.162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bridging the research gap between reservoir operations and inundation risks under the future climate, this study integrates a hydrologic reservoir management model with a 2D hydrodynamic model, comparing the conventional regulatory and the optimized reservoir operations based on the particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm. Results reveal that optimized operations using the PSO algorithm consistently outperform conventional strategies by better-managing peak discharges and controlling downstream inundation. The study further differentiates between PSO-optimized plans: PSO1, which prioritizes peak reduction at the flood control point, and PSO2, which focuses on minimizing inundation areas. Interestingly, PSO2 proves superior for single-point peak reduction, typically the primary objective in current practices, whereas PSO1, despite lesser peak reduction, achieves a smaller inundation area, enhancing basin-scale flood resilience. This discrepancy underscores the need to consider downstream inundation risks as critical evaluation metrics in reservoir optimization, a factor often overlooked in existing studies. The research underscores the importance of updating operational frameworks to incorporate 2D inundation risks and adapt to increased flood risks under changing climate conditions. Despite optimization, future climate scenarios predict increased flood exposure, indicating that the current safety discharge rates and flow regulations at control points are outdated and require revision.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将水库运行与二维淹没风险和气候不确定性联系起来
为了弥补未来气候条件下水库运行与淹没风险之间的研究空白,本研究将水文水库管理模型与二维水动力模型相结合,比较了传统的管理方法和基于粒子群优化(PSO)算法的优化水库运行方法。研究结果表明,使用 PSO 算法的优化操作始终优于传统策略,能更好地管理峰值排水和控制下游淹没。研究进一步区分了 PSO 优化计划:PSO1 优先考虑降低洪水控制点的峰值,而 PSO2 则侧重于尽量缩小淹没区。有趣的是,PSO2 被证明在单点削峰方面更胜一筹,这通常是当前实践中的主要目标;而 PSO1 尽管削峰效果较差,但却实现了较小的淹没面积,增强了流域范围的抗洪能力。这种差异突出表明,在水库优化过程中,有必要将下游淹没风险作为重要的评估指标,而现有研究往往忽视了这一因素。这项研究强调了更新运行框架的重要性,以纳入二维淹没风险并适应不断变化的气候条件下增加的洪水风险。尽管进行了优化,但未来的气候情景预测洪水风险会增加,这表明目前的安全排放率和控制点流量规定已经过时,需要进行修订。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The performance of encoder–decoder neural networks for leak detection in water distribution networks Impact of flexible vegetation on hydraulic characteristics in compound channels with converging floodplains Climatic teleconnection of the future trend of meteorological, GRACE-DSI, and vegetation-conditioned-based drought analysis in the Ganga Basin Does water rights trading promote the efficiency of water use? Empirical evidence from pilot water rights trading in China Water quality analysis, treatment, and economic feasibility of water services of the Neora River in the fringe area of Neora-Valley National Park, India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1