Interference by vitamin B12-macrocomplexes: towards an effective detection and correct interpretation of hypo- and hypervitaminemia

José A. Delgado, María I. Pastor, Gemma Costa, Nuria Márquez, J. M. Bauçà
{"title":"Interference by vitamin B12-macrocomplexes: towards an effective detection and correct interpretation of hypo- and hypervitaminemia","authors":"José A. Delgado, María I. Pastor, Gemma Costa, Nuria Márquez, J. M. Bauçà","doi":"10.1515/almed-2024-0041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n The presence of macro-B12 is a cause of factual hypervitaminemia B12. Precipitation with polyethylene glycol (PEG) is a simple method of removing high-molecular-weight biomolecules. However, “free” molecule may co-precipitate. This fact imposes the need to establish new reference values for the post-precipitation result. The main aims of the study were to (Baeza I, Corchón A, Pérez JM, Remacha AF, Rocha H, Rodríguez-Portugal E, et al. Basic Aspects of vitamin B12. In: Communication Committee of the Spanish Society of Laboratory Medicine (SEQCML). Clinical significance of vitamin B12 deficiency. Beyond megaloblastic anemia; 2022. ISBN: 978-84-89975-60-6): establish post-PEG reference intervals (RIs) for total vitamin B12 (Iqtidar N, Chaudary MN. Misdiagnosed vitamin B12 deficiency a challenge to be confronted by use of modern screening markers. J Pak Med Assoc 2012;62:1223–9); compare the two bibliographic criteria for defining the presence of macro-B12 (Green R. Vitamin B12 deficiency from the perspective of a practicing hematologist. Blood 2017;129:2603–11); evaluate the joint usefulness of percentage post-PEG vitamin B12 recovery and post-PEG RIs to inform the real vitamin B12 status; and (Carmel R. Diagnosis and management of clinical and subclinical cobalamin deficiencies: why controversies persist in the age of sensitive metabolic testing. Biochimie 2013;95:1047–55), propose interpretative comments for ease of interpretation.\n \n \n \n Prospective study in which 488 serum samples from “healthy” individuals were included and analyzed to determine recovery and RIs following PEG precipitation. Subsequently, a retrospective analysis was carried out in order to evaluate the joint usefulness of both definitions for a suspicion of macro-B12. A total of 297 cases were included.\n \n \n \n Recovery and post-PEG RIs determined on an Alinity i platform ranged from 60 to 107 % and from 118 to 506 pmol/L, respectively. McNemar’s test revealed statistically significant differences between both criteria for estimating interference. However, both methodologies showed good agreement. In 27 cases, the presence of macro-B12 coexisted with true hypervitaminemia B12. No case of coexistence of macro-B12 with vitamin B12 deficiency was detected in our series.\n \n \n \n Laboratory reports should include total vitamin B12 concentration, recovery and post-PEG vitamin B12 concentration with their adjusted RIs to better assess the body vitamin status.\n","PeriodicalId":502333,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Laboratory Medicine / Avances en Medicina de Laboratorio","volume":"18 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Laboratory Medicine / Avances en Medicina de Laboratorio","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/almed-2024-0041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The presence of macro-B12 is a cause of factual hypervitaminemia B12. Precipitation with polyethylene glycol (PEG) is a simple method of removing high-molecular-weight biomolecules. However, “free” molecule may co-precipitate. This fact imposes the need to establish new reference values for the post-precipitation result. The main aims of the study were to (Baeza I, Corchón A, Pérez JM, Remacha AF, Rocha H, Rodríguez-Portugal E, et al. Basic Aspects of vitamin B12. In: Communication Committee of the Spanish Society of Laboratory Medicine (SEQCML). Clinical significance of vitamin B12 deficiency. Beyond megaloblastic anemia; 2022. ISBN: 978-84-89975-60-6): establish post-PEG reference intervals (RIs) for total vitamin B12 (Iqtidar N, Chaudary MN. Misdiagnosed vitamin B12 deficiency a challenge to be confronted by use of modern screening markers. J Pak Med Assoc 2012;62:1223–9); compare the two bibliographic criteria for defining the presence of macro-B12 (Green R. Vitamin B12 deficiency from the perspective of a practicing hematologist. Blood 2017;129:2603–11); evaluate the joint usefulness of percentage post-PEG vitamin B12 recovery and post-PEG RIs to inform the real vitamin B12 status; and (Carmel R. Diagnosis and management of clinical and subclinical cobalamin deficiencies: why controversies persist in the age of sensitive metabolic testing. Biochimie 2013;95:1047–55), propose interpretative comments for ease of interpretation. Prospective study in which 488 serum samples from “healthy” individuals were included and analyzed to determine recovery and RIs following PEG precipitation. Subsequently, a retrospective analysis was carried out in order to evaluate the joint usefulness of both definitions for a suspicion of macro-B12. A total of 297 cases were included. Recovery and post-PEG RIs determined on an Alinity i platform ranged from 60 to 107 % and from 118 to 506 pmol/L, respectively. McNemar’s test revealed statistically significant differences between both criteria for estimating interference. However, both methodologies showed good agreement. In 27 cases, the presence of macro-B12 coexisted with true hypervitaminemia B12. No case of coexistence of macro-B12 with vitamin B12 deficiency was detected in our series. Laboratory reports should include total vitamin B12 concentration, recovery and post-PEG vitamin B12 concentration with their adjusted RIs to better assess the body vitamin status.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
维生素 B12 超级复合物的干扰:有效检测和正确解读低维生素血症和高维生素血症
大分子 B12 的存在是造成事实性高维生素 B12 血症的原因之一。用聚乙二醇(PEG)沉淀是去除高分子量生物分子的一种简单方法。然而,"游离 "分子可能会共同沉淀。因此有必要为沉淀后的结果建立新的参考值。这项研究的主要目的是(Baeza I、Corchón A、Pérez JM、Remacha AF、Rocha H、Rodríguez-Portugal E 等:维生素 B12 的基本方面。In:西班牙检验医学学会交流委员会(SEQCML)。维生素 B12 缺乏症的临床意义。超越巨幼红细胞性贫血;2022 年。ISBN:978-84-89975-60-6):建立总维生素 B12 的后 PEG 参考区间 (RIs)(Iqtidar N、Chaudary MN.误诊维生素 B12 缺乏症是使用现代筛查指标所面临的挑战。J Pak Med Assoc 2012;62:1223-9);比较两种文献标准来定义是否存在宏B12(Green R. Vitamin B12 deficiency from the perspective of a practicing hematologist.Blood 2017;129:2603-11);评估PEG后维生素B12恢复百分比和PEG后RIs对告知维生素B12真实状况的共同作用;以及(Carmel R. Diagnosis and management of clinical and subclinical cobalamin deficiencies: why controversies persist in the age of sensitive metabolic testing.Biochimie 2013;95:1047-55),提出了便于解释的解释性意见。 前瞻性研究纳入了 488 份来自 "健康 "个体的血清样本,并对其进行了分析,以确定 PEG 沉淀后的回收率和 RI。随后,进行了一项回顾性分析,以评估两种定义对怀疑大肠杆菌-B12 的共同作用。共纳入 297 个病例。 在 Alinity i 平台上测定的回收率和 PEG 后 RI 分别为 60% 至 107%,118 至 506 pmol/L。McNemar 检验显示,两种干扰估计标准之间存在显著的统计学差异。不过,两种方法显示出良好的一致性。在 27 个病例中,宏量 B12 与真正的高维生素 B12 血症同时存在。在我们的系列研究中,没有发现大B12与维生素B12缺乏同时存在的病例。 实验室报告应包括总维生素 B12 浓度、恢复和 PEG 后维生素 B12 浓度及其调整 RI,以更好地评估体内维生素状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Recuperación de espermatozoides de la orina en hombres con eyaculación retrógrada Investigating the incremental value of urine sediment reporting in emergency medicine with a Sysmex UN urinalysis system Surgimiento y evolución de los sistemas de normalización para laboratorios clínicos Interference by vitamin B12-macrocomplexes: towards an effective detection and correct interpretation of hypo- and hypervitaminemia Mass spectrometry in clinical protein laboratories
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1