Husam Abuawad, Mohammad AlShatnawi, R. Shawashreh, Maya Attarakih, Mahmoud AlHarbi, Eman AlShebli, Husam Twaissi, Mohammad Sunoqrot
{"title":"Predictors of Mortality Following Mitral Valve Replacement: A Systematic\nReview","authors":"Husam Abuawad, Mohammad AlShatnawi, R. Shawashreh, Maya Attarakih, Mahmoud AlHarbi, Eman AlShebli, Husam Twaissi, Mohammad Sunoqrot","doi":"10.2174/0102506882312599240708105339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nValvular heart diseases are some of the most common causes of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality worldwide. The mitral valve is estimated to\nbe the cause of 15% of deaths in heart valve disease. Mitral valve dysfunction can be treated with a variety of operative options, one of whichis\nmitral valve replacement. Although it is less desirable than repair, in some situations, it is the only viable option. Thus, we conducted this\nsystematic review to help guide future risk assessment for mitral valve replacement patients and help in the construction of pre-operative risk\nassessment tools.\n\n\n\nThis is a systematic review of original articles discussing the topic of predictors of mortality for patients undergoing mitral valve replacement\nsurgery. A systematic search was conducted via independent researchers across a number of databases, starting with PubMed databases utilizing its\nMeSH database, followed by a complementary search through Google Scholar.\n\n\n\nIn total, 27 original articles were included in a collective cohort of 145005 patients. Older age was the most commonly cited variable as a mortality\npredictor, followed by decreased left ventricular ejection fraction. EuroSCORE is a well-known scoring system that predicts in-hospital mortality\nfollowing major cardiac surgeries. It was found that it overestimated mortality greatly, while another study found that the revised EuroSCORE II\nsystem was a better predictor of mortality. Overall, we note that both versions usually overestimate mortality.\n\n\n\nThere seems to be an overall agreement over several factors, including older age, decreased ejection fraction, and the expertise of the surgeon and\nthe institution on being clear predictors of postoperative mortality. There is also an obvious need for new tools to better predict mortality rates\npreoperatively, as the currently used scores often result in greatly inaccurate predictions\n","PeriodicalId":110816,"journal":{"name":"New Emirates Medical Journal","volume":"42 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Emirates Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0102506882312599240708105339","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Valvular heart diseases are some of the most common causes of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality worldwide. The mitral valve is estimated to
be the cause of 15% of deaths in heart valve disease. Mitral valve dysfunction can be treated with a variety of operative options, one of whichis
mitral valve replacement. Although it is less desirable than repair, in some situations, it is the only viable option. Thus, we conducted this
systematic review to help guide future risk assessment for mitral valve replacement patients and help in the construction of pre-operative risk
assessment tools.
This is a systematic review of original articles discussing the topic of predictors of mortality for patients undergoing mitral valve replacement
surgery. A systematic search was conducted via independent researchers across a number of databases, starting with PubMed databases utilizing its
MeSH database, followed by a complementary search through Google Scholar.
In total, 27 original articles were included in a collective cohort of 145005 patients. Older age was the most commonly cited variable as a mortality
predictor, followed by decreased left ventricular ejection fraction. EuroSCORE is a well-known scoring system that predicts in-hospital mortality
following major cardiac surgeries. It was found that it overestimated mortality greatly, while another study found that the revised EuroSCORE II
system was a better predictor of mortality. Overall, we note that both versions usually overestimate mortality.
There seems to be an overall agreement over several factors, including older age, decreased ejection fraction, and the expertise of the surgeon and
the institution on being clear predictors of postoperative mortality. There is also an obvious need for new tools to better predict mortality rates
preoperatively, as the currently used scores often result in greatly inaccurate predictions
瓣膜性心脏病是导致全球心血管疾病发病和死亡的最常见原因之一。据估计,15%的心脏瓣膜病患者死于二尖瓣。二尖瓣功能障碍可通过多种手术方式治疗,其中之一是二尖瓣置换术。虽然它不如修复术理想,但在某些情况下,它是唯一可行的选择。因此,我们进行了这一系统性综述,以帮助指导二尖瓣置换术患者未来的风险评估,并帮助构建术前风险评估工具。这是一篇系统性综述,收录了讨论二尖瓣置换术患者死亡率预测因素这一主题的原创文章。独立研究人员在多个数据库中进行了系统性检索,首先利用其MeSH数据库对PubMed数据库进行了检索,随后又通过谷歌学术进行了补充检索。高龄是最常被引用的死亡率预测变量,其次是左心室射血分数下降。EuroSCORE 是预测重大心脏手术后院内死亡率的著名评分系统。研究发现,它大大高估了死亡率,而另一项研究则发现,修订后的 EuroSCORE II 系统能更好地预测死亡率。总体而言,我们注意到这两个版本通常都高估了死亡率。在一些因素上,包括年龄偏大、射血分数下降以及外科医生和医疗机构的专业技能等,似乎都是术后死亡率的明确预测因素。由于目前使用的评分通常会导致预测非常不准确,因此显然需要新的工具来更好地预测术前死亡率。