Navigating the EU AI Act Maze using a Decision-Tree Approach

Hilmy Hanif, Jorge Constantino, Marie-Theres Sekwenz, M. van Eeten, J. Ubacht, Ben Wagner, Yury Zhauniarovich
{"title":"Navigating the EU AI Act Maze using a Decision-Tree Approach","authors":"Hilmy Hanif, Jorge Constantino, Marie-Theres Sekwenz, M. van Eeten, J. Ubacht, Ben Wagner, Yury Zhauniarovich","doi":"10.1145/3677174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The AI Act represents a significant legislative effort by the European Union to govern the use of AI systems according to different risk-related classes, imposing different degrees of compliance obligations to users and providers of AI systems. However, it is often critiqued due to the lack of general public comprehension and effectiveness regarding the classification of AI systems to the corresponding risk classes. To mitigate these shortcomings, we propose a Decision-Tree-based framework aimed at increasing legal compliance and classification clarity. By performing a quantitative evaluation, we show that our framework is especially beneficial to individuals without a legal background, allowing them to enhance the accuracy and speed of AI system classification according to the AI Act. The qualitative study results show that the framework is helpful to all participants, allowing them to justify intuitively made decisions and making the classification process clearer.","PeriodicalId":486991,"journal":{"name":"ACM Journal on Responsible Computing","volume":"3 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Journal on Responsible Computing","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3677174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The AI Act represents a significant legislative effort by the European Union to govern the use of AI systems according to different risk-related classes, imposing different degrees of compliance obligations to users and providers of AI systems. However, it is often critiqued due to the lack of general public comprehension and effectiveness regarding the classification of AI systems to the corresponding risk classes. To mitigate these shortcomings, we propose a Decision-Tree-based framework aimed at increasing legal compliance and classification clarity. By performing a quantitative evaluation, we show that our framework is especially beneficial to individuals without a legal background, allowing them to enhance the accuracy and speed of AI system classification according to the AI Act. The qualitative study results show that the framework is helpful to all participants, allowing them to justify intuitively made decisions and making the classification process clearer.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用决策树方法驾驭欧盟人工智能法案迷宫
人工智能法》是欧盟在立法方面做出的一项重大努力,它按照不同的风险等级对人工智能系统的使用进行管理,对人工智能系统的用户和提供商规定了不同程度的合规义务。然而,由于公众对将人工智能系统划分为相应的风险等级缺乏理解和有效性,该法案经常受到批评。为了弥补这些不足,我们提出了一个基于决策树的框架,旨在提高法律合规性和分类清晰度。通过进行定量评估,我们表明我们的框架尤其有利于没有法律背景的个人,使他们能够根据《人工智能法》提高人工智能系统分类的准确性和速度。定性研究结果表明,该框架对所有参与者都有帮助,使他们能够证明直观决策的合理性,并使分类过程更加清晰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Improving Group Fairness Assessments with Proxies Navigating the EU AI Act Maze using a Decision-Tree Approach This Is Going on Your Permanent Record: A Legal Analysis of Educational Data in the Cloud Mapping the complexity of legal challenges for trustworthy drones on construction sites in the United Kingdom Optimising Human-Machine Collaboration for Efficient High-Precision Information Extraction from Text Documents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1