The discovery and naming of the Sumatran Rhinoceros (Dicerorhinus sumatrensis) after 1793, with details of the Rhinoceros Sumatricus of Bertuch (1805) and Wilhelm (1808)

Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Evolutionary Systematics Pub Date : 2024-07-10 DOI:10.3897/evolsyst.8.127773
K. Rookmaaker
{"title":"The discovery and naming of the Sumatran Rhinoceros (Dicerorhinus sumatrensis) after 1793, with details of the Rhinoceros Sumatricus of Bertuch (1805) and Wilhelm (1808)","authors":"K. Rookmaaker","doi":"10.3897/evolsyst.8.127773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There was a considerable gap of 21 years between the illustrated description of a specimen of the Sumatran Rhinoceros (Dicerorhinus sumatrensis) by William Bell in 1793 and the proposal to accept it as a named new species by Gotthelf Fischer in 1814. In the meantime some 17 authors reported the possibility that the animal should be regarded as a new species. Hitherto overlooked, the German writer Friedrich Justin Bertuch used a new name in the caption to a reproduction of Bell’s plate, as Rhinoceros bicornis Sumatricus. This was published in 1805 in a second edition of his “Bilderbuch für Kinder”, a serial magazine aimed at young people. This work has an extremely complex bibliography through many re-issues and translations, which is only partly resolved. The same name in the combination Rhinoceros Sumatricus was included by Gottlieb Tobias Wilhelm in a companion to the “Bilderbuch” available in 1808. The complicated circumstances of Bertuch’s proposal in 1805 and his unusual usage of a trinomen lead to the suggestion that his book might not be consistently binominal, making the name unavailable. The naming by Wilhelm in 1808 is straightforward and correct, hence Rhinoceros sumatricus Wilhelm, 1808 is an available name and a senior objective synonym of Rhinoceros sumatrensis G. Fischer, 1814. The International Code of Zoological Nomenclature allows the suggestion that Wilhelm’s name was a nomen oblitum (forgotten name). The various plates of the rhinoceros found in the “Bilderbuch” by Bertuch and the “Unterhaltungen aus der Naturgeschichte” are figured and explained.","PeriodicalId":36314,"journal":{"name":"Evolutionary Systematics","volume":"13 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolutionary Systematics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3897/evolsyst.8.127773","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There was a considerable gap of 21 years between the illustrated description of a specimen of the Sumatran Rhinoceros (Dicerorhinus sumatrensis) by William Bell in 1793 and the proposal to accept it as a named new species by Gotthelf Fischer in 1814. In the meantime some 17 authors reported the possibility that the animal should be regarded as a new species. Hitherto overlooked, the German writer Friedrich Justin Bertuch used a new name in the caption to a reproduction of Bell’s plate, as Rhinoceros bicornis Sumatricus. This was published in 1805 in a second edition of his “Bilderbuch für Kinder”, a serial magazine aimed at young people. This work has an extremely complex bibliography through many re-issues and translations, which is only partly resolved. The same name in the combination Rhinoceros Sumatricus was included by Gottlieb Tobias Wilhelm in a companion to the “Bilderbuch” available in 1808. The complicated circumstances of Bertuch’s proposal in 1805 and his unusual usage of a trinomen lead to the suggestion that his book might not be consistently binominal, making the name unavailable. The naming by Wilhelm in 1808 is straightforward and correct, hence Rhinoceros sumatricus Wilhelm, 1808 is an available name and a senior objective synonym of Rhinoceros sumatrensis G. Fischer, 1814. The International Code of Zoological Nomenclature allows the suggestion that Wilhelm’s name was a nomen oblitum (forgotten name). The various plates of the rhinoceros found in the “Bilderbuch” by Bertuch and the “Unterhaltungen aus der Naturgeschichte” are figured and explained.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1793 年后苏门答腊犀牛(Dicerorhinus sumatrensis)的发现和命名,以及 Bertuch(1805 年)和 Wilhelm(1808 年)的苏门答腊犀牛的详细情况
从威廉-贝尔(William Bell)于 1793 年绘声绘色地描述苏门答腊犀牛(Dicerorhinus sumatrensis)标本,到戈特尔夫-费舍尔(Gotthelf Fischer)于 1814 年提议将其作为一个命名的新物种,中间相隔了 21 年之久。在此期间,约有 17 位作者报告了将该动物视为新物种的可能性。迄今为止,德国作家弗里德里希-贾斯汀-贝尔图赫(Friedrich Justin Bertuch)在贝尔图版的标题中使用了一个新名称,即苏门答腊犀牛(Rhinoceros bicornis Sumatricus)。这本书于 1805 年发表在他的 "Bilderbuch für Kinder"(一本面向青少年的连载杂志)第二版中。这部作品经过多次再版和翻译,书目极为复杂,目前只解决了部分问题。戈特利布-托比亚斯-威廉(Gottlieb Tobias Wilhelm)在 1808 年出版的 "Bilderbuch "的附录中收录了同名的苏门答腊犀牛(Rhinoceros Sumatricus)。贝尔图赫在 1805 年提出这一建议时的复杂情况以及他对三名的不寻常使用,导致有人认为他的书中可能没有一致的双名法,从而使这一名称无法使用。Wilhelm 在 1808 年的命名直接而正确,因此 Rhinoceros sumatricus Wilhelm, 1808 是一个可用的名称,也是 Rhinoceros sumatrensis G. Fischer, 1814 的高级客观异名。国际动物命名法》允许认为 Wilhelm 的名字是一个被遗忘的名字(nomen oblitum)。对贝尔图赫的《Bilderbuch》和《Unterhaltungen aus der Naturgeschichte》中的各种犀牛图版进行了标注和解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Evolutionary Systematics
Evolutionary Systematics Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Insect Science
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
A treasure trove of endemics: two new species of snake-eyed skinks of the genus Panaspis Cope, 1868 (Squamata, Scincidae) from the Serra da Neve Inselberg, southwestern Angola The discovery and naming of the Sumatran Rhinoceros (Dicerorhinus sumatrensis) after 1793, with details of the Rhinoceros Sumatricus of Bertuch (1805) and Wilhelm (1808) Application of extended depth of field 3D imagery to tackle the challenges of cryptic species: a use case in the genus Betiscoides Sjöstedt, 1924 (Orthoptera, Caelifera, Lentulidae) and its taxonomic implications Systematic revision of the Eyelash Palm-Pitviper Bothriechis schlegelii (Serpentes, Viperidae), with the description of five new species and revalidation of three Systematic revision of the Eyelash Palm-Pitviper Bothriechis schlegelii (Serpentes, Viperidae), with the description of five new species and revalidation of three
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1