Artificial Intelligence Assistive Tool for Radiotherapy Plan Evaluation Based on Analysis of Integral Dose

Shriram Rajurkar, Teerthraj Verma, Mlb Bhatt, S. P. Mishra, P. Deshmukh, D. Sargar
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence Assistive Tool for Radiotherapy Plan Evaluation Based on Analysis of Integral Dose","authors":"Shriram Rajurkar, Teerthraj Verma, Mlb Bhatt, S. P. Mishra, P. Deshmukh, D. Sargar","doi":"10.4103/jrcr.jrcr_66_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\n \n \n \n The aim of the present study is to propose an in-house developed artificial intelligence (AI) tool based on Python programming for the purpose of integral doses (IDs) calculation useful in plan evaluation in modern radiotherapy techniques.\n \n \n \n Retrospectively, curative radiotherapy plans of cancer head and neck planned with intensity-modulated radiation therapy techniques employing seven and nine photon beams of 6 MV, were included in this study. The derived dose-volume histogram data were analyzed for the calculation of ID for each of the contoured structures including high-risk planning target volume (HR-PTV) and surrounding normal structures using an in-house developed Python program.\n \n \n \n In this study, variation of ID between nine-beam and seven-beam plans was calculated. It was found that the ID for HR-PTV volume was almost equal in both nine and seven beam plans with the percentage variation range 0.4%–1.4%, however, significant variation up to 14.4% in the ID of organ at risk was found. Furthermore, we utilized the standard deviation (SD) as a metric to assess the variability of the ID within the PTV and the surrounding normal tissues. The HR-PTV exhibited a low SD of 0.71, suggesting consistent ID patterns. In contrast, the organs at risk (OAR) exhibited noteworthy variations in SD values, with some reaching as high as 16.75. The SD was relatively elevated in the OAR in comparison to the HR-PTV. These elevated SD values within the OAR indicate significant dose variability across different patients.\n \n \n \n It is found that ID increases as the number of beams increases. The Python program used in this study for the calculation of ID, as an AI assistive tool for plan evaluation, can be run on the TPS or on a side-by-side computer which may be helpful in finalizing radiotherapy plans.\n","PeriodicalId":16923,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radiation and Cancer Research","volume":"49 16","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radiation and Cancer Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jrcr.jrcr_66_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The aim of the present study is to propose an in-house developed artificial intelligence (AI) tool based on Python programming for the purpose of integral doses (IDs) calculation useful in plan evaluation in modern radiotherapy techniques. Retrospectively, curative radiotherapy plans of cancer head and neck planned with intensity-modulated radiation therapy techniques employing seven and nine photon beams of 6 MV, were included in this study. The derived dose-volume histogram data were analyzed for the calculation of ID for each of the contoured structures including high-risk planning target volume (HR-PTV) and surrounding normal structures using an in-house developed Python program. In this study, variation of ID between nine-beam and seven-beam plans was calculated. It was found that the ID for HR-PTV volume was almost equal in both nine and seven beam plans with the percentage variation range 0.4%–1.4%, however, significant variation up to 14.4% in the ID of organ at risk was found. Furthermore, we utilized the standard deviation (SD) as a metric to assess the variability of the ID within the PTV and the surrounding normal tissues. The HR-PTV exhibited a low SD of 0.71, suggesting consistent ID patterns. In contrast, the organs at risk (OAR) exhibited noteworthy variations in SD values, with some reaching as high as 16.75. The SD was relatively elevated in the OAR in comparison to the HR-PTV. These elevated SD values within the OAR indicate significant dose variability across different patients. It is found that ID increases as the number of beams increases. The Python program used in this study for the calculation of ID, as an AI assistive tool for plan evaluation, can be run on the TPS or on a side-by-side computer which may be helpful in finalizing radiotherapy plans.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于积分剂量分析的放疗计划评估人工智能辅助工具
摘要 本研究旨在提出一种基于 Python 编程的内部开发的人工智能(AI)工具,用于计算现代放疗技术计划评估中有用的积分剂量(IDs)。 本研究对头颈部癌症的治疗放疗计划进行了回顾性分析,这些计划采用了强度调制放疗技术,使用了七束和九束 6 MV 的光子束。研究人员使用自行开发的 Python 程序分析了得出的剂量-体积直方图数据,以计算每个轮廓结构(包括高风险计划靶体积(HR-PTV)和周围正常结构)的 ID。 本研究计算了九束计划和七束计划的 ID 差异。结果发现,在九束和七束计划中,HR-PTV容积的ID几乎相等,百分比变化范围为0.4%-1.4%,但在高危器官的ID上发现了高达14.4%的显著差异。此外,我们还利用标准偏差(SD)来评估 PTV 和周围正常组织内 ID 的变化。HR-PTV的标准差较低,为0.71,这表明ID模式是一致的。相比之下,危险器官(OAR)的 SD 值变化显著,有些高达 16.75。与 HR-PTV 相比,OAR 的 SD 值相对较高。OAR 内这些升高的 SD 值表明不同患者的剂量存在显著差异。 研究发现,ID 会随着光束数量的增加而增加。本研究中用于计算ID的Python程序作为计划评估的人工智能辅助工具,可在TPS或并排计算机上运行,这可能有助于最终确定放疗计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Re-irradiation in High-grade Glioma: An Experience from A Series of Five Patients Artificial Intelligence Assistive Tool for Radiotherapy Plan Evaluation Based on Analysis of Integral Dose Rhabdoid Differentiation in Wilms Tumor Osseous Leiomyosarcoma: A Rare Entity Association of Positive Family History and Clinicopathological Features in Breast Cancer in Young Indian Females – A Pilot Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1