Ratio aut auctores? Reason, Authority and the Anagogic Ascent in the Twelfth Century

Religions Pub Date : 2024-07-09 DOI:10.3390/rel15070830
Jack Cunningham
{"title":"Ratio aut auctores? Reason, Authority and the Anagogic Ascent in the Twelfth Century","authors":"Jack Cunningham","doi":"10.3390/rel15070830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the twelfth century, certain thinkers in the north of Europe were exalting human reason in a manner that had not been seen since the time of the ancient philosophers. Adelard of Bath, William of Conches, Thierry of Chartres and Peter Abelard all championed ratio in a way that seemed to challenge the hegemony of learning that rested securely with the authority of scripture, the testament of the Fathers and the canons of the established councils. In so doing, it represented a significantly different approach from the firmly established ‘authors’ (auctores) as certain scholars pursued their learning, and indeed even divine ascent, via other avenues. Even the visionary Hildegard von Bingen set enormous stock in rationality. This paper will discuss the use of reason for the anagogic ascent to the divine in order to trace its roots to a Platonic understanding of the universe in tandem with a highly positive anthropology that allowed for a bold reassessment of human capabilities, as well as a new appreciation of nature.","PeriodicalId":505829,"journal":{"name":"Religions","volume":"81 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Religions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15070830","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the twelfth century, certain thinkers in the north of Europe were exalting human reason in a manner that had not been seen since the time of the ancient philosophers. Adelard of Bath, William of Conches, Thierry of Chartres and Peter Abelard all championed ratio in a way that seemed to challenge the hegemony of learning that rested securely with the authority of scripture, the testament of the Fathers and the canons of the established councils. In so doing, it represented a significantly different approach from the firmly established ‘authors’ (auctores) as certain scholars pursued their learning, and indeed even divine ascent, via other avenues. Even the visionary Hildegard von Bingen set enormous stock in rationality. This paper will discuss the use of reason for the anagogic ascent to the divine in order to trace its roots to a Platonic understanding of the universe in tandem with a highly positive anthropology that allowed for a bold reassessment of human capabilities, as well as a new appreciation of nature.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ratio aut auctores?十二世纪的理性、权威和翱翔之翼
12 世纪,欧洲北部的某些思想家以一种自古代哲学家时代以来从未有过的方式推崇人类理性。巴思的阿德拉德、康什的威廉、沙特尔的蒂埃里和彼得-阿伯拉尔都主张比率,似乎是在挑战以经文、教父的遗嘱和既定会议的教规为权威的学术霸权。在这样做的过程中,它代表了一种与牢固确立的 "作者"(auctores)截然不同的方法,因为某些学者通过其他途径追求他们的学识,甚至是神性的升华。即使是有远见的希尔德加德-冯-宾根(Hildegard von Bingen)也非常重视理性。本文将讨论理性在神性上升中的应用,以追溯其根源,即柏拉图式的宇宙理解与高度积极的人类学,后者允许对人类的能力进行大胆的重新评估,并对自然进行新的评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
From Modengjia Jing to Xiuyaojing: The Accumulation of Indian Astronomical Knowledge in the Chinese Buddhist Canon Finding the Creative Synergy between Spiritual Care and the Schwartz Rounds Clergy Wives and Well-Being: The Impact of Perceived Congregational Perfectionism and Protective Factors The Doctrine of Faith, Doubt, and Assurance: A Historical, Philosophical, and Theological Analysis William James: The Mystical Experimentation of a Sick Soul
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1