The Doctrine of Faith, Doubt, and Assurance: A Historical, Philosophical, and Theological Analysis

Religions Pub Date : 2024-08-08 DOI:10.3390/rel15080960
S. Strehle
{"title":"The Doctrine of Faith, Doubt, and Assurance: A Historical, Philosophical, and Theological Analysis","authors":"S. Strehle","doi":"10.3390/rel15080960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How do individuals find assurance of their personal standing before God? This article discusses the way different traditions of the Christian faith tried to answer the question—some leaving room for doubt in the process and others demanding absolute certainty from the believer. All fellowships experienced some problems with the issue due to the very nature of the question. Assurance required a reflexive act that turned the eyes of the believer away from the good things of God and the promises of the gospel toward an inspection of one’s inner man and motives that were difficult to discern. Those fellowships that emphasized a human condition in the process of salvation or assurance often struggled with their depravity before God and unworthiness to claim the promises of divine grace. This paper particularly focuses upon the struggles of the so-called Calvinists, who were more enamored with the question than the other fellowships and had difficulty developing a coherent or definitive answer, caught as they were between tensions in their theology, between the Christocentric vision of John Calvin that led toward assurance and the synergistic tendences of Theodore Beza and Heinrich Bullinger that led toward doubt. The paper provides some criticism of their theology but sympathizes with their struggle and finds faith and doubt inevitable parts of the Christian life here on earth.","PeriodicalId":505829,"journal":{"name":"Religions","volume":"19 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Religions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15080960","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

How do individuals find assurance of their personal standing before God? This article discusses the way different traditions of the Christian faith tried to answer the question—some leaving room for doubt in the process and others demanding absolute certainty from the believer. All fellowships experienced some problems with the issue due to the very nature of the question. Assurance required a reflexive act that turned the eyes of the believer away from the good things of God and the promises of the gospel toward an inspection of one’s inner man and motives that were difficult to discern. Those fellowships that emphasized a human condition in the process of salvation or assurance often struggled with their depravity before God and unworthiness to claim the promises of divine grace. This paper particularly focuses upon the struggles of the so-called Calvinists, who were more enamored with the question than the other fellowships and had difficulty developing a coherent or definitive answer, caught as they were between tensions in their theology, between the Christocentric vision of John Calvin that led toward assurance and the synergistic tendences of Theodore Beza and Heinrich Bullinger that led toward doubt. The paper provides some criticism of their theology but sympathizes with their struggle and finds faith and doubt inevitable parts of the Christian life here on earth.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于信仰、怀疑和确信的学说:历史、哲学和神学分析
个人如何在上帝面前找到个人地位的保证?本文讨论了基督教信仰的不同传统试图回答这个问题的方式--有些传统在回答过程中留有怀疑的余地,有些传统则要求信徒有绝对的确定性。由于这个问题的本质,所有团体在这个问题上都遇到了一些问题。保证需要一种条件反射式的行为,它使信徒的目光从上帝的美事和福音的应许转向对自己内心和难以辨别的动机的审视。那些在救赎或保证过程中强调人的状况的团契,常常为自己在神面前的堕落和不配得到神恩典的应许而挣扎。本文尤其关注所谓的加尔文派的挣扎,他们比其他派别更热衷于这个问题,却很难找到一个连贯或明确的答案,因为他们在神学中处于紧张状态,一方面是约翰-加尔文的基督中心观导致了确信,另一方面是西奥多-贝萨和海因里希-布林格的协同倾向导致了怀疑。本文对他们的神学提出了一些批评,但同情他们的挣扎,并认为信仰和怀疑是基督徒在世生活中不可避免的部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
From Modengjia Jing to Xiuyaojing: The Accumulation of Indian Astronomical Knowledge in the Chinese Buddhist Canon Finding the Creative Synergy between Spiritual Care and the Schwartz Rounds Clergy Wives and Well-Being: The Impact of Perceived Congregational Perfectionism and Protective Factors The Doctrine of Faith, Doubt, and Assurance: A Historical, Philosophical, and Theological Analysis William James: The Mystical Experimentation of a Sick Soul
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1