A comparative study of letrozole and clomiphene citrate for ovulation induction in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome: a randomized controlled trial

Subashree Ilangovan
{"title":"A comparative study of letrozole and clomiphene citrate for ovulation induction in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome: a randomized controlled trial","authors":"Subashree Ilangovan","doi":"10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20241954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Effective ovulation induction is crucial in management of polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) related infertility. Clomiphene citrate (CC) has long been the first line of treatment for inducing ovulation in women with PCOS. Letrozole, an aromatase inhibitor, has emerged as a promising alternative to CC for ovulation induction. The present study was aimed to compare efficacy and safety of letrozole versus CC for ovulation induction in women with PCOS.\nMethods: This study consists of 384 PCOS women, randomized into two groups: Letrozole (2.5 mg/day) and CC (50 mg/day), both administered from day 3 to day 7 of the menstrual cycle. The primary outcome was the ovulation rate, confirmed by serum progesterone levels >10 ng/ml. Secondary outcomes included clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate, endometrial thickness, adverse effects, cost-effectiveness, and patient satisfaction. Participants were monitored through transvaginal ultrasound and serum progesterone measurements.\nResults: Ovulation was achieved in 76.0% of participants in the letrozole group compared to 55.2% in the CC group (p<0.001). Clinical pregnancy rates were significantly higher in the letrozole group (44.8%) compared to the CC group (28.1%) (p<0.001). Similarly, live birth rates were higher with letrozole (36.5% vs. 22.4%; p=0.002). Endometrial thickness was greater in the letrozole group (8.7 mm vs. 7.5 mm; p<0.001). Adverse effects, were significantly lower in the letrozole group.\nConclusions: Letrozole is more effective than CC in inducing ovulation and achieving higher pregnancy and live birth rates in women with PCOS.","PeriodicalId":14225,"journal":{"name":"International journal of reproduction, contraception, obstetrics and gynecology","volume":"61 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of reproduction, contraception, obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20241954","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Effective ovulation induction is crucial in management of polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) related infertility. Clomiphene citrate (CC) has long been the first line of treatment for inducing ovulation in women with PCOS. Letrozole, an aromatase inhibitor, has emerged as a promising alternative to CC for ovulation induction. The present study was aimed to compare efficacy and safety of letrozole versus CC for ovulation induction in women with PCOS. Methods: This study consists of 384 PCOS women, randomized into two groups: Letrozole (2.5 mg/day) and CC (50 mg/day), both administered from day 3 to day 7 of the menstrual cycle. The primary outcome was the ovulation rate, confirmed by serum progesterone levels >10 ng/ml. Secondary outcomes included clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate, endometrial thickness, adverse effects, cost-effectiveness, and patient satisfaction. Participants were monitored through transvaginal ultrasound and serum progesterone measurements. Results: Ovulation was achieved in 76.0% of participants in the letrozole group compared to 55.2% in the CC group (p<0.001). Clinical pregnancy rates were significantly higher in the letrozole group (44.8%) compared to the CC group (28.1%) (p<0.001). Similarly, live birth rates were higher with letrozole (36.5% vs. 22.4%; p=0.002). Endometrial thickness was greater in the letrozole group (8.7 mm vs. 7.5 mm; p<0.001). Adverse effects, were significantly lower in the letrozole group. Conclusions: Letrozole is more effective than CC in inducing ovulation and achieving higher pregnancy and live birth rates in women with PCOS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
来曲唑和枸橼酸氯米芬诱导多囊卵巢综合征妇女排卵的比较研究:随机对照试验
背景:有效的促排卵是治疗多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)相关不孕症的关键。长期以来,枸橼酸氯米芬(CC)一直是多囊卵巢综合征妇女诱导排卵的一线治疗药物。来曲唑是一种芳香化酶抑制剂,已成为CC诱导排卵的一种有前途的替代疗法。本研究旨在比较来曲唑与CC对多囊卵巢综合征妇女诱导排卵的疗效和安全性:本研究由 384 名多囊卵巢综合征妇女组成,随机分为两组:来曲唑(2.5毫克/天)和CC(50毫克/天),均在月经周期的第3天至第7天用药。主要结果是排卵率,通过血清孕酮水平大于 10 纳克/毫升来确认。次要结果包括临床妊娠率、活产率、子宫内膜厚度、不良反应、成本效益和患者满意度。通过经阴道超声和血清孕酮测量对参与者进行监测:来曲唑组76.0%的参与者实现了排卵,而CC组为55.2%(P<0.001)。来曲唑组的临床妊娠率(44.8%)明显高于CC组(28.1%)(p<0.001)。同样,来曲唑组的活产率更高(36.5% 对 22.4%;P=0.002)。来曲唑组的子宫内膜厚度更大(8.7 毫米对 7.5 毫米;P<0.001)。来曲唑组的不良反应明显降低:结论:来曲唑比CC更能有效诱导多囊卵巢综合征妇女排卵,并提高妊娠率和活产率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy as primary and associated indications for caesarean section Tracking immunization milestones: a community-based survey of child vaccination compliance from birth to one year age in India Menstrual hygiene among the undergraduate medical college students in Churachandpur Medical College, Manipur, North Eastern state of India A study on feto-maternal outcome in patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes Modes and timing of delivery along with maternal and neonatal conditions for preeclamptic patients of Rajshahi, Bangladesh
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1