Assessing Soil and Land Suitability of an Olive–Maize Agroforestry System Using Machine Learning Algorithms

Crops Pub Date : 2024-07-09 DOI:10.3390/crops4030022
Asif Hayat, Javed Iqbal, Amanda J. Ashworth, P. R. Owens
{"title":"Assessing Soil and Land Suitability of an Olive–Maize Agroforestry System Using Machine Learning Algorithms","authors":"Asif Hayat, Javed Iqbal, Amanda J. Ashworth, P. R. Owens","doi":"10.3390/crops4030022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Exponential population increases are threatening food security, particularly in mountainous areas. One potential solution is dual-use intercropped agroforestry systems such as olive (Olea europaea)–maize (Zea mays), which may mitigate risk by providing multiple market sources (oil and grain) for smallholder producers. Several studies have conducted integrated agroforestry land suitability analyses; however, few studies have used machine learning (ML) algorithms to evaluate multiple variables (i.e., soil physicochemical properties and climatic and topographic data) for the selection of suitable rainfed sites in mountainous terrain systems. The goal of this study is therefore to identify suitable land classes for an integrated olive–maize agroforestry system based on the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) land suitability assessment framework for 1757 km2 in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province, Pakistan. Information on soil physical and chemical properties was obtained from 701 soil samples, along with climatic and topographic data. After determination of land suitability classes for an integrated olive–maize-crop agroforestry system, the region was then mapped through ML algorithms using random forest (RF) and support vector machine (SVM), as well as using traditional techniques of weighted overlay (WOL). Land suitability classes predicted by ML techniques varied greatly. For example, the S1 area (highly suitable) classified through RF was 9%↑ than that of SVM, and 8%↓ than that through WOL. The area of S2 (moderately suitable) classified through RF was 18%↑ than that of SWM and was 17%↓ than the area classified through WOL; similarly, the S3 (marginally suitable) class area via RF was 27%↓ than that of SVM, and 45%↓ than the area classified through WOL. Conversely, the area of N2 (permanently not suitable class) classified through RF and SVM was 6%↑ than the area classified through WOL. Model performance was assessed through overall accuracy and Kappa Index and indicated that RF performed better than SVM and WOL. Crop suitability limitations of the study area included high elevation, slope, pH, and large gravel content. Results can be used for sustainable intensification in mountainous rainfed regions by expanding intercrop agroforestry systems in developing nations to close yield gaps.","PeriodicalId":505308,"journal":{"name":"Crops","volume":"122 48","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crops","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/crops4030022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Exponential population increases are threatening food security, particularly in mountainous areas. One potential solution is dual-use intercropped agroforestry systems such as olive (Olea europaea)–maize (Zea mays), which may mitigate risk by providing multiple market sources (oil and grain) for smallholder producers. Several studies have conducted integrated agroforestry land suitability analyses; however, few studies have used machine learning (ML) algorithms to evaluate multiple variables (i.e., soil physicochemical properties and climatic and topographic data) for the selection of suitable rainfed sites in mountainous terrain systems. The goal of this study is therefore to identify suitable land classes for an integrated olive–maize agroforestry system based on the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) land suitability assessment framework for 1757 km2 in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province, Pakistan. Information on soil physical and chemical properties was obtained from 701 soil samples, along with climatic and topographic data. After determination of land suitability classes for an integrated olive–maize-crop agroforestry system, the region was then mapped through ML algorithms using random forest (RF) and support vector machine (SVM), as well as using traditional techniques of weighted overlay (WOL). Land suitability classes predicted by ML techniques varied greatly. For example, the S1 area (highly suitable) classified through RF was 9%↑ than that of SVM, and 8%↓ than that through WOL. The area of S2 (moderately suitable) classified through RF was 18%↑ than that of SWM and was 17%↓ than the area classified through WOL; similarly, the S3 (marginally suitable) class area via RF was 27%↓ than that of SVM, and 45%↓ than the area classified through WOL. Conversely, the area of N2 (permanently not suitable class) classified through RF and SVM was 6%↑ than the area classified through WOL. Model performance was assessed through overall accuracy and Kappa Index and indicated that RF performed better than SVM and WOL. Crop suitability limitations of the study area included high elevation, slope, pH, and large gravel content. Results can be used for sustainable intensification in mountainous rainfed regions by expanding intercrop agroforestry systems in developing nations to close yield gaps.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用机器学习算法评估橄榄-玉米农林系统的土壤和土地适宜性
人口的指数式增长正威胁着粮食安全,尤其是在山区。一种潜在的解决方案是两用间作农林系统,如橄榄(Olea europaea)-玉米(Zea mays),该系统可为小农生产者提供多种市场来源(油料和谷物),从而降低风险。有几项研究对农林业土地适宜性进行了综合分析;但是,很少有研究使用机器学习(ML)算法来评估多个变量(即土壤理化性质、气候和地形数据),以选择山区地形系统中适合雨水灌溉的地点。因此,本研究的目标是根据联合国粮食及农业组织(FAO)的土地适宜性评估框架,为巴基斯坦开伯尔巴图克瓦省 1757 平方公里的橄榄-玉米综合农林系统确定合适的土地等级。从 701 个土壤样本中获得了有关土壤物理和化学特性的信息,以及气候和地形数据。在确定了橄榄-玉米-农作物综合农林系统的土地适宜性等级后,利用随机森林(RF)和支持向量机(SVM)以及传统的加权叠加(WOL)技术,通过 ML 算法绘制了该地区的地图。ML 技术预测的土地适宜性等级差异很大。例如,RF 预测的 S1 面积(高度适宜)比 SVM 预测的面积大 9%↑,比 WOL 预测的面积大 8%↓。通过 RF 分类的 S2(中度适宜)面积比通过 SWM 分类的面积大 18%↑,比通过 WOL 分类的面积大 17%↓;同样,通过 RF 分类的 S3(略微适宜)面积比通过 SVM 分类的面积大 27%↓,比通过 WOL 分类的面积大 45%↓。相反,通过 RF 和 SVM 分类的 N2(永久不适合类)面积比通过 WOL 分类的面积少 6%↑。通过总体准确度和 Kappa 指数对模型性能进行了评估,结果表明 RF 的性能优于 SVM 和 WOL。研究区域作物适宜性的限制因素包括海拔高、坡度大、pH 值高和砾石含量大。研究结果可用于山区雨养地区的可持续集约化,在发展中国家扩大农林间作系统,缩小产量差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Climate Change and Its Positive and Negative Impacts on Irrigated Corn Yields in a Region of Colorado (USA) Estimating Sugarcane Maturity Using High Spatial Resolution Remote Sensing Images Adoption Pattern of Direct-Seeded Rice Systems in Three South Asian Countries during COVID-19 and Thereafter Assessing Soil and Land Suitability of an Olive–Maize Agroforestry System Using Machine Learning Algorithms Variations and Commonalities of Farming Systems Based on Ecological Principles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1