Variations and Commonalities of Farming Systems Based on Ecological Principles

Crops Pub Date : 2024-07-08 DOI:10.3390/crops4030021
Anil Shrestha, David Horwitz
{"title":"Variations and Commonalities of Farming Systems Based on Ecological Principles","authors":"Anil Shrestha, David Horwitz","doi":"10.3390/crops4030021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the last few decades, various types of farming systems based on ecological principles have been proposed and developed. There is often interest in knowing about the differences between these systems, but such information must be obtained from several sources describing each of these systems. Therefore, this paper is an effort to consolidate the information on these systems in a concise manner without making comparative ratings between them. We found three components contained in the overarching theme of these systems: the reduction in external inputs, environmental protection, and sustainability. However, several variations exist between them, each with its own focus and guiding principles. Also, these farming systems contain their own specific terms to identify themselves and contain their own set of philosophies based on their founder. In this review, we provided a short description of some of the major ecologically based farming systems such as “agroecology”, “regenerative agriculture”, “holistic management”, “carbon farming”, “organic farming”, “permaculture”, “biodynamic farming”, “conservation agriculture”, and “regenerative organic farming”. We summarized these farming systems as “variants of farming systems based on ecological principles” and outlined the similarities and differences between them. We also discussed how the themes of these systems relate to the United Nations’ thirteen principles of agroecology. Although these systems share several similarities, their philosophy is rooted in their founders and the communities that choose to adopt these philosophies. Last, we discussed some of the challenges in implementing these ecological agriculture systems.","PeriodicalId":505308,"journal":{"name":"Crops","volume":"114 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crops","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/crops4030021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the last few decades, various types of farming systems based on ecological principles have been proposed and developed. There is often interest in knowing about the differences between these systems, but such information must be obtained from several sources describing each of these systems. Therefore, this paper is an effort to consolidate the information on these systems in a concise manner without making comparative ratings between them. We found three components contained in the overarching theme of these systems: the reduction in external inputs, environmental protection, and sustainability. However, several variations exist between them, each with its own focus and guiding principles. Also, these farming systems contain their own specific terms to identify themselves and contain their own set of philosophies based on their founder. In this review, we provided a short description of some of the major ecologically based farming systems such as “agroecology”, “regenerative agriculture”, “holistic management”, “carbon farming”, “organic farming”, “permaculture”, “biodynamic farming”, “conservation agriculture”, and “regenerative organic farming”. We summarized these farming systems as “variants of farming systems based on ecological principles” and outlined the similarities and differences between them. We also discussed how the themes of these systems relate to the United Nations’ thirteen principles of agroecology. Although these systems share several similarities, their philosophy is rooted in their founders and the communities that choose to adopt these philosophies. Last, we discussed some of the challenges in implementing these ecological agriculture systems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于生态原则的耕作制度的差异与共性
在过去的几十年里,人们提出并发展了各种基于生态原则的耕作制度。人们往往有兴趣了解这些系统之间的差异,但这些信息必须从描述每种系统的多个来源获得。因此,本文试图在不对这些系统进行比较评级的情况下,以简明扼要的方式整合有关这些系统的信息。我们发现,这些系统的总主题包含三个组成部分:减少外部投入、环境保护和可持续性。不过,它们之间也存在一些差异,各有各的侧重点和指导原则。此外,这些耕作制度都有自己的特定术语来识别自己,并根据其创始人的情况包含自己的一套理念。在这篇综述中,我们简要介绍了一些主要的生态农业系统,如 "生态农业"、"再生农业"、"整体管理"、"碳农业"、"有机农业"、"生态农业"、"生物动力农业"、"保护性农业 "和 "再生有机农业"。我们将这些耕作制度概括为 "基于生态原则的耕作制度变体",并概述了它们之间的异同。我们还讨论了这些系统的主题与联合国生态农业十三项原则的关系。虽然这些系统有一些相似之处,但其理念都植根于其创始人和选择采用这些理念的社区。最后,我们讨论了实施这些生态农业系统所面临的一些挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Climate Change and Its Positive and Negative Impacts on Irrigated Corn Yields in a Region of Colorado (USA) Estimating Sugarcane Maturity Using High Spatial Resolution Remote Sensing Images Adoption Pattern of Direct-Seeded Rice Systems in Three South Asian Countries during COVID-19 and Thereafter Assessing Soil and Land Suitability of an Olive–Maize Agroforestry System Using Machine Learning Algorithms Variations and Commonalities of Farming Systems Based on Ecological Principles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1