David Hume's Skepticism - Expression of the Late Baroque

Marius Dumitrescu
{"title":"David Hume's Skepticism - Expression of the Late Baroque","authors":"Marius Dumitrescu","doi":"10.18662/brain/15.2/567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The early Baroque, characterized by the skeptical spirit of the 16th century, reaches its peak in the following century with Descartes' hyperbolic doubt. The purpose of this paper is to analyze two of Hume's works, \"Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion\" and \"An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding\" in order to place the philosopher in the tradition of Baroque thought. First of all, we will show that David Hume pushed skepticism far beyond its ancient or Cartesian limits, attacking even our way of formulating sentences, which is a subjective one, the result of some psychological factors that cannot be the basis of science. Secondly, we will demonstrate that Hume's skepticism belongs to the late Baroque and is, by its radical character, a form of metaphysical denial of any universal certainties. In conclusion, Hume's skeptical spirit, manifested in relation to the authority constructed by the post-Westphalian ideology, overcame the past, which was at the time denied, and represents, from a philosophical point of view, the origin of the revolutionary spirit of the second half of the 18th century.","PeriodicalId":504804,"journal":{"name":"BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18662/brain/15.2/567","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The early Baroque, characterized by the skeptical spirit of the 16th century, reaches its peak in the following century with Descartes' hyperbolic doubt. The purpose of this paper is to analyze two of Hume's works, "Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion" and "An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding" in order to place the philosopher in the tradition of Baroque thought. First of all, we will show that David Hume pushed skepticism far beyond its ancient or Cartesian limits, attacking even our way of formulating sentences, which is a subjective one, the result of some psychological factors that cannot be the basis of science. Secondly, we will demonstrate that Hume's skepticism belongs to the late Baroque and is, by its radical character, a form of metaphysical denial of any universal certainties. In conclusion, Hume's skeptical spirit, manifested in relation to the authority constructed by the post-Westphalian ideology, overcame the past, which was at the time denied, and represents, from a philosophical point of view, the origin of the revolutionary spirit of the second half of the 18th century.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大卫-休谟的怀疑论--巴洛克晚期的表现形式
早期巴洛克以 16 世纪的怀疑精神为特征,在下个世纪以笛卡尔的双曲式怀疑达到顶峰。本文旨在分析休谟的两部作品《关于自然宗教的对话》和《关于人类理解的探究》,以便将这位哲学家置于巴洛克思想的传统之中。首先,我们将证明大卫-休谟将怀疑论推向了远古或笛卡尔的极限,甚至抨击了我们的遣词造句方式,这种方式是主观的,是一些心理因素的结果,不能作为科学的基础。其次,我们将证明休谟的怀疑论属于巴洛克晚期,就其激进性而言,它是形而上学否认任何普遍确定性的一种形式。总之,休谟的怀疑精神体现在与后西方式意识形态所构建的权威的关系中,它战胜了当时被否定的过去,并从哲学的角度代表了 18 世纪下半叶革命精神的起源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of Epileptic Seizures Stages through Attractor Dynamics AWAKE School Intervention Program: Improving Executive Functions and Reducing Social and Emotional Difficulties in School-Aged Children Psychomotric Perspectives of Rehabilitation in Chronic Brachial Plexus Palsies Computer Algebra Systems & Artificial Intelligence David Hume's Skepticism - Expression of the Late Baroque
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1