Analysis of injury risk levels in young footballers: A review of functional movement screens and static balance scores

Retos Pub Date : 2024-07-03 DOI:10.47197/retos.v58.107683
Alexy Totti Fahrosi, Khoiril Anam, A. Setiowati, Sugiarto Sugiarto, Nugroho Susanto, Tiok Wijanarko, Hendra Setyawan, Gema Fitriady, Özgür Eken, Z. Kozina, Francesca Latino, Francesco Tafuri, José Vicente García-Jiménez
{"title":"Analysis of injury risk levels in young footballers: A review of functional movement screens and static balance scores","authors":"Alexy Totti Fahrosi, Khoiril Anam, A. Setiowati, Sugiarto Sugiarto, Nugroho Susanto, Tiok Wijanarko, Hendra Setyawan, Gema Fitriady, Özgür Eken, Z. Kozina, Francesca Latino, Francesco Tafuri, José Vicente García-Jiménez","doi":"10.47197/retos.v58.107683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Injury or wound is damage to the structure or function of the body due to physical force or pressure. This study aims to analyze the risk of injury in young footballers in terms of the Functional Movement Screen (FMS) based on static balance scores. This study used a descriptive observational research method. The subjects were 31 young footballers (age 13.6±0.5 years, BMI 19.5±2.2 kg/m², TD 15.5±10 months). The data collection instrument involved FMS and Stand Stork Test (SST). The data were then analyzed using descriptive statistics. This study found that the FMS score with a high injury risk category was 6.45% in the SST poor category. Meanwhile, FMS scores in the moderate injury risk category were 19.35% in the SST moderate category, 32.25% in the SST poor category, and 3.25% in the SST very poor category. FMS scores in the low injury risk category were 6.45% in the moderate SST category and 32.25% in the poor SST category. The conclusion is that SPSS soccer academy students have a potential risk of injury in the moderate category and a static balance level in the less category. In addition, after reviewing the results of FMS scores based on SST scores, it can be concluded that FMS scores in the moderate category are found in samples with poor category SST, which is 32.25%. This study suggests improving static balance to prevent the risk of sports injuries in young footballers. Similar research in the future is also recommended, especially the one that uses other physical component variables and different research sample characteristics.","PeriodicalId":503742,"journal":{"name":"Retos","volume":" 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Retos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v58.107683","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: Injury or wound is damage to the structure or function of the body due to physical force or pressure. This study aims to analyze the risk of injury in young footballers in terms of the Functional Movement Screen (FMS) based on static balance scores. This study used a descriptive observational research method. The subjects were 31 young footballers (age 13.6±0.5 years, BMI 19.5±2.2 kg/m², TD 15.5±10 months). The data collection instrument involved FMS and Stand Stork Test (SST). The data were then analyzed using descriptive statistics. This study found that the FMS score with a high injury risk category was 6.45% in the SST poor category. Meanwhile, FMS scores in the moderate injury risk category were 19.35% in the SST moderate category, 32.25% in the SST poor category, and 3.25% in the SST very poor category. FMS scores in the low injury risk category were 6.45% in the moderate SST category and 32.25% in the poor SST category. The conclusion is that SPSS soccer academy students have a potential risk of injury in the moderate category and a static balance level in the less category. In addition, after reviewing the results of FMS scores based on SST scores, it can be concluded that FMS scores in the moderate category are found in samples with poor category SST, which is 32.25%. This study suggests improving static balance to prevent the risk of sports injuries in young footballers. Similar research in the future is also recommended, especially the one that uses other physical component variables and different research sample characteristics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分析青少年足球运动员的受伤风险水平:功能性运动筛查和静态平衡评分回顾
:损伤或伤口是指由于物理力量或压力对身体结构或功能造成的损害。本研究旨在根据静态平衡评分,从功能性运动筛查(FMS)的角度分析青少年足球运动员的受伤风险。本研究采用描述性观察研究方法。研究对象为 31 名青少年足球运动员(年龄为 13.6±0.5 岁,体重指数为 19.5±2.2 kg/m²,发育时间为 15.5±10 个月)。数据收集工具包括 FMS 和站立鹳测试(SST)。然后使用描述性统计对数据进行分析。研究发现,在 SST 差的类别中,高伤害风险类别的 FMS 得分为 6.45%。同时,中度受伤风险类别的 FMS 分数在 SST 中度类别中占 19.35%,在 SST 差类别中占 32.25%,在 SST 极差类别中占 3.25%。低受伤风险类别的 FMS 分数在 SST 中等类别中占 6.45%,在 SST 差类别中占 32.25%。结论是,SPSS 足球学院学生的潜在受伤风险属于中等类别,静态平衡水平属于较低类别。此外,在根据 SST 分数对 FMS 分数的结果进行审查后,可以得出结论,在 SST 较差类别的样本中,FMS 分数处于中等类别,占 32.25%。本研究建议改善青少年足球运动员的静态平衡,以预防运动损伤的风险。建议今后开展类似的研究,尤其是使用其他身体成分变量和不同研究样本特征的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Percepción de la relación deporte-política desde las funciones de la economía política (Perception of the sport-politics relationship from the functions of political economy) La evaluación en educación física: representaciones sociales de profesores de establecimientos educacionales de Viña del Mar, Chile (Evaluation in physical education: social representations of teachers from educational establishments in Viña del Mar, Chile) Composición corporal y autoestima corporal en usuarios de gimnasios en una población colombiana (Body composition and body self-esteem in gym users in a Colombian city) Self efficacy analysis of Yogyakarta middle school extracurricular martial arts trainers: gender and coaching license level Characteristics of gross motor skills of elementary school students aged 7 and 8 years: a cross-sectional study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1