Clinico-microbiological evaluation of post-cesarean surgical site infections

Kangan, R. Mehra, Varsha Gupta, Poonam Goel, Manjeet Kaur
{"title":"Clinico-microbiological evaluation of post-cesarean surgical site infections","authors":"Kangan, R. Mehra, Varsha Gupta, Poonam Goel, Manjeet Kaur","doi":"10.25259/ijms_268_2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nWith increasing rates of cesarean section (CS), the incidence of post-operative complications is bound to increase, which includes surgical site infections (SSIs), being one of the common and distressing complication. This study was aimed to evaluate the various determinants of post-CS SSI, their clinical spectrum, prevalent microbiology, and their susceptibility and resistance patterns.\n\n\n\nThis was a prospective longitudinal hospital-based study undertaken in Government Medical College and Hospital (GMCH), Chandigarh. Six hundred and eighty-eight patients were included from April, 2021, to September, 2022, and were followed up till 42nd day post-procedure.\n\n\n\nThe incidence of SSI in the study was 3.49%. The risk factors identified were gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), thrombocytopenia, chorioamnionitis, prolonged labor, multiple per vaginum examinations, prolonged surgery, post-partum hemorrhage, and blood and blood product transfusions. Most patients presented on or after day 8 of surgery with discharge from the wound site being the most common presentation. Staphylococcus aureus emerged as the most prevalent organism and out of five patients having S. aureus, three had methicillin-resistant S. aureus. Linezolid was found to be the most susceptible antibiotic, whereas ciprofloxacin was mostly resistant among the prevalent isolates.\n\n\n\nSome of these determinants are modifiable such as GDM and thrombocytopenia and if detected and managed early may help in reducing the risk of developing SSI. Linezolid must be used empirically for treatment of SSI until the reporting of culture and sensitivity is done because routine antibiotics used for antibiotic prophylaxis in CS were found to be highly resistant. Periodic analysis of clinical spectrum and culture and sensitivity patterns is imperative for the early diagnosis and appropriate empirical management of SSI.\n","PeriodicalId":505755,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"110 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/ijms_268_2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With increasing rates of cesarean section (CS), the incidence of post-operative complications is bound to increase, which includes surgical site infections (SSIs), being one of the common and distressing complication. This study was aimed to evaluate the various determinants of post-CS SSI, their clinical spectrum, prevalent microbiology, and their susceptibility and resistance patterns. This was a prospective longitudinal hospital-based study undertaken in Government Medical College and Hospital (GMCH), Chandigarh. Six hundred and eighty-eight patients were included from April, 2021, to September, 2022, and were followed up till 42nd day post-procedure. The incidence of SSI in the study was 3.49%. The risk factors identified were gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), thrombocytopenia, chorioamnionitis, prolonged labor, multiple per vaginum examinations, prolonged surgery, post-partum hemorrhage, and blood and blood product transfusions. Most patients presented on or after day 8 of surgery with discharge from the wound site being the most common presentation. Staphylococcus aureus emerged as the most prevalent organism and out of five patients having S. aureus, three had methicillin-resistant S. aureus. Linezolid was found to be the most susceptible antibiotic, whereas ciprofloxacin was mostly resistant among the prevalent isolates. Some of these determinants are modifiable such as GDM and thrombocytopenia and if detected and managed early may help in reducing the risk of developing SSI. Linezolid must be used empirically for treatment of SSI until the reporting of culture and sensitivity is done because routine antibiotics used for antibiotic prophylaxis in CS were found to be highly resistant. Periodic analysis of clinical spectrum and culture and sensitivity patterns is imperative for the early diagnosis and appropriate empirical management of SSI.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
剖腹产后手术部位感染的临床微生物学评估
随着剖宫产率(CS)的增加,术后并发症的发生率也必然会增加,其中手术部位感染(SSI)是常见且令人痛苦的并发症之一。本研究旨在评估 CS 术后 SSI 的各种决定因素、其临床范围、流行微生物学及其易感性和耐药性模式。从 2021 年 4 月到 2022 年 9 月,共纳入了 68 名患者,并随访至术后第 42 天。研究发现的风险因素包括妊娠糖尿病(GDM)、血小板减少症、绒毛膜羊膜炎、产程延长、多次阴道检查、手术时间过长、产后出血以及输血和输血产品。大多数患者在手术第 8 天或之后发病,最常见的症状是伤口流脓。金黄色葡萄球菌是最常见的病原菌,在 5 名感染金黄色葡萄球菌的患者中,有 3 人感染了耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌。在流行的分离菌中,利奈唑胺是最易感的抗生素,而环丙沙星则大多具有耐药性。由于在 CS 中用于抗生素预防的常规抗生素被发现具有高度耐药性,因此在报告培养和药敏结果之前,必须根据经验使用来奈唑胺治疗 SSI。定期分析临床谱、培养和药敏模式对于早期诊断和适当的 SSI 经验性治疗至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Good clinical practice in India: What a researcher should know? Clinico-microbiological evaluation of post-cesarean surgical site infections An unusual case of rectal schwannoma: A case report A case of tuberculosis of adrenal gland presenting as acute adrenal insufficiency following initiation of anti-tubercular therapy Rare presentation of gastric glomus tumor in a 28-year-old female with gastritis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1