Psychometry of Latent Characteristics: Tools, Problems of Rank Information Processing, Solutions

V. Mitikhin
{"title":"Psychometry of Latent Characteristics: Tools, Problems of Rank Information Processing, Solutions","authors":"V. Mitikhin","doi":"10.17759/psyedu.2024160204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper examines the problems of correctness and adequacy of the use of psychometric tools in psychosocial research and applications. The main attention is paid to the problem of correct processing of rank information, which is non-numeric information that does not allow the use of classical mathematical operations, starting with the addition operation. The approach of forming the results of processing expert, ranked information in the scale of relations based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), which includes a measurement apparatus and decision-making algorithms, is presented. An example is given that simulates the situation of an expert council and demonstrates unacceptable contradictions that arise with the \"numerical\" approach to processing rank information. The algorithms of the AHP normative approach are presented, which allow obtaining numerical, personalized assessments of psychosocial characteristics. The basic concepts of the Rasch Measurement (RM) for comparing the capabilities of AHP and RM in psychosocial applications are described. Some critical remarks about the methods of psychometry are considered. It is shown that the origins of the criticisms are associated with a superficial understanding of the basic concepts of psychometric measurements and the scope of their applications, as well as with elementary errors when using the apparatus of psychometric instruments.","PeriodicalId":513840,"journal":{"name":"Psychological-Educational Studies","volume":"6 2‐3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological-Educational Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17759/psyedu.2024160204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper examines the problems of correctness and adequacy of the use of psychometric tools in psychosocial research and applications. The main attention is paid to the problem of correct processing of rank information, which is non-numeric information that does not allow the use of classical mathematical operations, starting with the addition operation. The approach of forming the results of processing expert, ranked information in the scale of relations based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), which includes a measurement apparatus and decision-making algorithms, is presented. An example is given that simulates the situation of an expert council and demonstrates unacceptable contradictions that arise with the "numerical" approach to processing rank information. The algorithms of the AHP normative approach are presented, which allow obtaining numerical, personalized assessments of psychosocial characteristics. The basic concepts of the Rasch Measurement (RM) for comparing the capabilities of AHP and RM in psychosocial applications are described. Some critical remarks about the methods of psychometry are considered. It is shown that the origins of the criticisms are associated with a superficial understanding of the basic concepts of psychometric measurements and the scope of their applications, as well as with elementary errors when using the apparatus of psychometric instruments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
潜在特征的心理测量:工具、等级信息处理问题、解决方案
本文探讨了在社会心理研究和应用中使用心理测量工具的正确性和充分性问题。主要关注的是等级信息的正确处理问题,因为等级信息是非数字信息,不允许使用经典数学运算(从加法运算开始)。本文介绍了基于层次分析法(AHP)的专家等级信息处理结果形成方法,其中包括测量仪器和决策算法。举例说明了模拟专家委员会的情况,并说明了 "数字 "处理等级信息的方法所产生的不可接受的矛盾。介绍了 AHP 规范方法的算法,通过这些算法可以对社会心理特征进行数值化、个性化的评估。介绍了用于比较 AHP 和 RM 在社会心理应用中的能力的 Rasch Measurement (RM) 的基本概念。还考虑了对心理测量方法的一些批评意见。结果表明,批评的根源在于对心理测量基本概念及其应用范围的肤浅理解,以及在使用心理测量工具时的基本错误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Student Academic Competence Questionnaire Formation of Characteristics of a Self-Actualizing Personality among Medical Students Comparison of Conditions for Organizing Joint Activities in Face-to-Face and Digital Spaces Personal Predictors of Pedagogical Assessment of Ability in Student Actors Psychometry of Latent Characteristics: Tools, Problems of Rank Information Processing, Solutions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1