Clinical Treatment Efficacy and Incidence of Complications in Asymmetric Double Eyelid Repair Surgery

Feng Jiao
{"title":"Clinical Treatment Efficacy and Incidence of Complications in Asymmetric Double Eyelid Repair Surgery","authors":"Feng Jiao","doi":"10.32629/jcmr.v5i2.2290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: It’s to analyze the clinical treatment efficacy and incidence of complications in asymmetric double eyelid repair surgery. Methods: Fifty patients who underwent asymmetric double eyelid repair surgery at our hospital from March 2022 to March 2023 were selected. Using a random number table, the patients were divided into two groups of equal size. The observation group (n=25) underwent small incision fat removal and continuous buried suture repair, while the control group (n=25) underwent traditional incision surgery. The treatment efficacy (excellent, effective, ineffective) and one-year postoperative complication incidence (conjunctival blockage, eye swelling, bruising) were compared between the two groups, as well as clinical data (operation time, healing time, incision length). Results: The total effective rate in the observation group (96%) was higher than that in the control group (64%); the one-year postoperative complication incidence in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05); the operation time, healing time, and incision length in the observation group were all less than those in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion: Double eyelid repair surgery demonstrates significant clinical efficacy and a low incidence of complications in treating asymmetric double eyelids, warranting further promotion.","PeriodicalId":15431,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine Research","volume":"49 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32629/jcmr.v5i2.2290","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: It’s to analyze the clinical treatment efficacy and incidence of complications in asymmetric double eyelid repair surgery. Methods: Fifty patients who underwent asymmetric double eyelid repair surgery at our hospital from March 2022 to March 2023 were selected. Using a random number table, the patients were divided into two groups of equal size. The observation group (n=25) underwent small incision fat removal and continuous buried suture repair, while the control group (n=25) underwent traditional incision surgery. The treatment efficacy (excellent, effective, ineffective) and one-year postoperative complication incidence (conjunctival blockage, eye swelling, bruising) were compared between the two groups, as well as clinical data (operation time, healing time, incision length). Results: The total effective rate in the observation group (96%) was higher than that in the control group (64%); the one-year postoperative complication incidence in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05); the operation time, healing time, and incision length in the observation group were all less than those in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion: Double eyelid repair surgery demonstrates significant clinical efficacy and a low incidence of complications in treating asymmetric double eyelids, warranting further promotion.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不对称双眼皮修复手术的临床疗效和并发症发生率
目的分析不对称双眼皮修复手术的临床疗效和并发症发生率。方法选取 2022 年 3 月至 2023 年 3 月在我院接受非对称双眼皮修复手术的 50 例患者。采用随机数字表法,将患者分为人数相等的两组。观察组(25 例)进行小切口脂肪去除和连续埋线修复,对照组(25 例)进行传统切口手术。比较两组的疗效(优、良、无效)和术后一年的并发症发生率(结膜阻塞、眼肿、淤血),以及临床数据(手术时间、愈合时间、切口长度)。结果观察组总有效率(96%)高于对照组(64%);观察组术后一年并发症发生率低于对照组(P<0.05);观察组手术时间、愈合时间、切口长度均少于对照组(P<0.05)。结论双眼皮修复手术治疗不对称双眼皮临床疗效显著,并发症发生率低,值得进一步推广。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Preventive Care and Rehabilitation Nursing on Elderly Hypertension Meta-analysis of In-stent Restenosis Factors after Coronary Intervention Effect of Dietary Carotenoids and Lutein on Eye Health Maintenance in Elderly People One Case of Solar Dermatitis Treated with Umbilical Needle "Four Positions" Combined with Body Acupuncture Primary Presacral Neuroendocrine Tumors Presented by Lumbosacral Pain: a Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1