The role of biomarkers in the early detection of dehiscence of intestinal and colonic anastomoses.

Mohammed M. Raslan, Amr Y. El-Shayeb, Mohammed A.M. Ghoneim, Ahmed S. Khalifa
{"title":"The role of biomarkers in the early detection of dehiscence of intestinal and colonic anastomoses.","authors":"Mohammed M. Raslan, Amr Y. El-Shayeb, Mohammed A.M. Ghoneim, Ahmed S. Khalifa","doi":"10.21608/ejsur.2024.291145.1080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Anastomotic leakage is a major complication after intestinal and colorectal surgery. Diagnosis is usually established days after it has occurred, which is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Inflammatory markers have been proposed to predict the incidence of anastomotic leakage. Objective: The aim was to evaluate the role of C-reactive protein (CRP), white cell count, gamma-glutamyl transferase, CRP/albumin ratio (CAR), neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and hyponatremia in early detection of anastomotic leakage (AL)in preclinical stage following open and laparoscopic colorectal and intestinal surgery. Patients and Methods: A longitudinal prospective cohort study included patients admitted to the general surgery department. Patients were indicated for intestinal anastomosis and were eligible for inclusion. Among them, 55 were on elective settings, and 50 in emergency settings. Results: A total of 105 patients were included. They had a mean age of 49.0±15.1 years and 61% of them were males. Twenty (19%) patients developed postoperative anastomotic leakage, among those, 6 were on the sixth postoperative day. CAR day 3 and CAR day 5 were significantly higher among the mortality patients with P values of 0.041 and 0.027, respectively. CRP level was significantly higher among patients with poor survival outcomes ( P value= 0.024 ). CRP trajectory was significantly associated with a mortality rate as patients who had a rise greater than 50 mg/dl between day 3 and day 5 had a higher mortality rate with a P value of 0.007. Conclusion: CRP trajectory, CAR and Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio can significantly predict the incidence of anastomotic leakage. Settings of surgery (emergency) was an independent risk factor for development of postoperative leakage.","PeriodicalId":22550,"journal":{"name":"The Egyptian Journal of Surgery","volume":"338 5‐6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Egyptian Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ejsur.2024.291145.1080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Anastomotic leakage is a major complication after intestinal and colorectal surgery. Diagnosis is usually established days after it has occurred, which is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Inflammatory markers have been proposed to predict the incidence of anastomotic leakage. Objective: The aim was to evaluate the role of C-reactive protein (CRP), white cell count, gamma-glutamyl transferase, CRP/albumin ratio (CAR), neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and hyponatremia in early detection of anastomotic leakage (AL)in preclinical stage following open and laparoscopic colorectal and intestinal surgery. Patients and Methods: A longitudinal prospective cohort study included patients admitted to the general surgery department. Patients were indicated for intestinal anastomosis and were eligible for inclusion. Among them, 55 were on elective settings, and 50 in emergency settings. Results: A total of 105 patients were included. They had a mean age of 49.0±15.1 years and 61% of them were males. Twenty (19%) patients developed postoperative anastomotic leakage, among those, 6 were on the sixth postoperative day. CAR day 3 and CAR day 5 were significantly higher among the mortality patients with P values of 0.041 and 0.027, respectively. CRP level was significantly higher among patients with poor survival outcomes ( P value= 0.024 ). CRP trajectory was significantly associated with a mortality rate as patients who had a rise greater than 50 mg/dl between day 3 and day 5 had a higher mortality rate with a P value of 0.007. Conclusion: CRP trajectory, CAR and Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio can significantly predict the incidence of anastomotic leakage. Settings of surgery (emergency) was an independent risk factor for development of postoperative leakage.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生物标志物在早期检测肠道和结肠吻合口裂开中的作用。
背景:吻合口漏是肠道和结直肠手术后的主要并发症。吻合口漏通常在发生后数天才能确诊,其发病率和死亡率都很高。有人提出用炎症标志物来预测吻合口漏的发生率。研究目的目的是评估 C 反应蛋白 (CRP)、白细胞计数、γ-谷氨酰转移酶、CRP/白蛋白比值 (CAR)、中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值 (NLR) 和低钠血症在开腹和腹腔镜结直肠和肠道手术后临床前阶段早期发现吻合口漏 (AL) 的作用。患者和方法:这是一项纵向前瞻性队列研究,研究对象包括普外科收治的患者。有肠吻合术指征的患者符合纳入条件。其中 55 例为择期手术,50 例为急诊手术。结果:共纳入 105 名患者。他们的平均年龄为(49.0±15.1)岁,61%为男性。20例(19%)患者出现术后吻合口漏,其中6例是在术后第6天。死亡率较高的患者术后第 3 天和第 5 天的 CAR 值分别为 0.041 和 0.027。存活率低的患者的 CRP 水平明显更高(P 值= 0.024)。CRP 的变化轨迹与死亡率明显相关,因为在第 3 天和第 5 天之间 CRP 升高超过 50 毫克/分升的患者死亡率更高,P 值为 0.007。结论CRP轨迹、CAR和中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值可显著预测吻合口漏的发生率。手术设置(急诊)是术后发生吻合口漏的独立风险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Study of the value of core biopsy for establishing tissue diagnosis compared to excisional biopsy in enlarged cervical lymph nodes Fibrin glue versus sutures for mesh fixation in open repair of inguinal hernia Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation with mucopexy versus stapled hemorrhoidopexy in the management of grades 3 and 4 prolapsed hemorrhoids: A prospective randomized clinical study Solitary fibrous tumor of the pleura Correlating preoperative clinicopathological factors with skin and/ or nipple–areola complex tumor involvement in postmastectomy specimens
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1