Risk factors and predictors of mortality in cases of on-demand relaparotomy due to complicated intraperitoneal Sepsis: a prospective study

Ahmed E. Elghrieb, Ashraf Abbas, Mahmoud A. Aziz, H. Elghadban, Magdy Basheer, Ahmed Negm, Abdelrahman Albahy
{"title":"Risk factors and predictors of mortality in cases of on-demand relaparotomy due to complicated intraperitoneal Sepsis: a prospective study","authors":"Ahmed E. Elghrieb, Ashraf Abbas, Mahmoud A. Aziz, H. Elghadban, Magdy Basheer, Ahmed Negm, Abdelrahman Albahy","doi":"10.21608/ejsur.2024.274050.1002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Relaparotomy patients burden healthcare systems, especially in low-income centers. With over occupying ICU beds at the hospital, numerous patients were not admitted to the ICU despite multiple surgeries and adverse events requiring strict supervision, so in this study we aimed to determine the risk factors and predictors of mortality in patients who underwent on-demand re-laparotomy (OD) due to complicated intraperitoneal sepsis. Methods: A total of 113 patients who needed re-laparotomy for complicated intraperitoneal sepsis were included in the study. Patients who underwent planned re-laparotomy (PR) or were re-explored laparoscopically were excluded. We followed with laboratory and radiological investigations to evaluate improvement, wound infection, anastomotic leakage, hemorrhage, burst abdomen, surgical re-exploration and mortality. Results: Mortality was greater in males (87.9 %), patients with chronic kidney disease (12.1 %), patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (27.3 %), patients with a negative surgical history of previous abdominal surgery, and patients with a presentation of acute abdomen (60.6 %). There were statistically significant differences between survived and mortality cases in terms of the procedure, operative findings, surgical site, preoperative shock, surgical procedure, admission to the ICU, and outcome of the intervention. Multi-organ failure Conclusion: Our study revealed the following factors are predictors of mortality in patients who needed OD due to complicated intraperitoneal sepsis: , pre-re-exploration shock, a time since primary surgery 7 days or more, the operative finding of mesenteric vascular occlusion and intestinal gangrene, intestinal","PeriodicalId":22550,"journal":{"name":"The Egyptian Journal of Surgery","volume":"82 S10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Egyptian Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ejsur.2024.274050.1002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Relaparotomy patients burden healthcare systems, especially in low-income centers. With over occupying ICU beds at the hospital, numerous patients were not admitted to the ICU despite multiple surgeries and adverse events requiring strict supervision, so in this study we aimed to determine the risk factors and predictors of mortality in patients who underwent on-demand re-laparotomy (OD) due to complicated intraperitoneal sepsis. Methods: A total of 113 patients who needed re-laparotomy for complicated intraperitoneal sepsis were included in the study. Patients who underwent planned re-laparotomy (PR) or were re-explored laparoscopically were excluded. We followed with laboratory and radiological investigations to evaluate improvement, wound infection, anastomotic leakage, hemorrhage, burst abdomen, surgical re-exploration and mortality. Results: Mortality was greater in males (87.9 %), patients with chronic kidney disease (12.1 %), patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (27.3 %), patients with a negative surgical history of previous abdominal surgery, and patients with a presentation of acute abdomen (60.6 %). There were statistically significant differences between survived and mortality cases in terms of the procedure, operative findings, surgical site, preoperative shock, surgical procedure, admission to the ICU, and outcome of the intervention. Multi-organ failure Conclusion: Our study revealed the following factors are predictors of mortality in patients who needed OD due to complicated intraperitoneal sepsis: , pre-re-exploration shock, a time since primary surgery 7 days or more, the operative finding of mesenteric vascular occlusion and intestinal gangrene, intestinal
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
复杂腹腔内败血症按需再剖腹手术病例的风险因素和死亡率预测:一项前瞻性研究
背景:再剖腹手术患者给医疗系统带来了负担,尤其是在低收入中心。由于医院的重症监护病房床位占用过多,许多患者尽管接受了多次手术并发生了需要严格监护的不良事件,但仍未被送入重症监护病房,因此在本研究中,我们旨在确定因复杂性腹腔内脓毒症而按需接受再腹膜切开术(OD)的患者的风险因素和死亡率预测因素。研究方法研究共纳入了113例因复杂性腹腔内败血症而需要再次腹腔镜手术的患者。排除了接受计划性再次腹腔切开术(PR)或腹腔镜再次探查的患者。我们对患者进行了实验室和放射学检查,以评估病情改善、伤口感染、吻合口渗漏、出血、腹部破裂、再次手术和死亡率。结果:男性(87.9%)、慢性肾病患者(12.1%)、2019 年冠状病毒病患者(27.3%)、既往腹部手术史阴性患者和急腹症患者(60.6%)的死亡率较高。存活病例和死亡病例在手术方式、手术发现、手术部位、术前休克、手术过程、入住重症监护室和干预结果等方面存在统计学差异。多器官功能衰竭 结论:我们的研究表明,以下因素可预测因复杂性腹腔内败血症而需要接受腹腔镜手术的患者的死亡率:、手术前休克、距初次手术时间 7 天或以上、手术发现肠系膜血管闭塞和肠坏疽、肠梗阻、腹腔镜手术前休克、腹腔镜手术后休克。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Study of the value of core biopsy for establishing tissue diagnosis compared to excisional biopsy in enlarged cervical lymph nodes Fibrin glue versus sutures for mesh fixation in open repair of inguinal hernia Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation with mucopexy versus stapled hemorrhoidopexy in the management of grades 3 and 4 prolapsed hemorrhoids: A prospective randomized clinical study Solitary fibrous tumor of the pleura Correlating preoperative clinicopathological factors with skin and/ or nipple–areola complex tumor involvement in postmastectomy specimens
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1