Evaluation of the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the management of rectal cancer

Ahmed F. Elkased, Naser M Abdel Bary, Mohamed S. Amar, Sherif Y. Hassan, Galal M. Abdel Kawy, Mohamed H. Elmelegy
{"title":"Evaluation of the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the management of rectal cancer","authors":"Ahmed F. Elkased, Naser M Abdel Bary, Mohamed S. Amar, Sherif Y. Hassan, Galal M. Abdel Kawy, Mohamed H. Elmelegy","doi":"10.21608/ejsur.2024.357107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". ABSTRACT Background: The current standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer is neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery. Recent research has highlighted the possible advantages of induction chemotherapy before concurrent Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for individuals with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Our research assesses the efficacy and viability of induction chemotherapy before concomitant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer. Patients and Methods: Forty patients with locally advanced cancer rectum were enrolled in our study in 2019–2021. Initially, they underwent an induction chemotherapy regimen consisting of 3 cycles of FOLFOX (oxaliplatin, leucovorin, 5 fluorouracil) over 3 months. Response assessment of the patients was done by pelvic MRI. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy was given 2 weeks after completion of induction chemotherapy. Four weeks later, the patients were reassessed by pelvic MRI, computed tomography chest, and abdomen. Total mesorectal excision was performed at 6–8 weeks after the end of radiotherapy. Included patients were evaluated for pCR, Circumferential resection margins (CRM), RO resection, sphincter preservation, treatment toxicity, and postoperative morbidity and mortality. Results: In this study, sphincter preservation was achieved in eight out of 21 (38%) patients with low rectal tumors less than or equal to 5 cm who were candidates for Abdominoperineal resection (APR) and shifted to Anterior resection (AR); complete pathological response was achieved in seven (20.5%) patient; R0 resection was achieved in 34 (92%) patients; CRM was positive in three patients; two of them developed local recurrence and one of them developed distant metastasis. Conclusion: For locally","PeriodicalId":22550,"journal":{"name":"The Egyptian Journal of Surgery","volume":"91 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Egyptian Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ejsur.2024.357107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

. ABSTRACT Background: The current standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer is neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery. Recent research has highlighted the possible advantages of induction chemotherapy before concurrent Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for individuals with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Our research assesses the efficacy and viability of induction chemotherapy before concomitant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer. Patients and Methods: Forty patients with locally advanced cancer rectum were enrolled in our study in 2019–2021. Initially, they underwent an induction chemotherapy regimen consisting of 3 cycles of FOLFOX (oxaliplatin, leucovorin, 5 fluorouracil) over 3 months. Response assessment of the patients was done by pelvic MRI. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy was given 2 weeks after completion of induction chemotherapy. Four weeks later, the patients were reassessed by pelvic MRI, computed tomography chest, and abdomen. Total mesorectal excision was performed at 6–8 weeks after the end of radiotherapy. Included patients were evaluated for pCR, Circumferential resection margins (CRM), RO resection, sphincter preservation, treatment toxicity, and postoperative morbidity and mortality. Results: In this study, sphincter preservation was achieved in eight out of 21 (38%) patients with low rectal tumors less than or equal to 5 cm who were candidates for Abdominoperineal resection (APR) and shifted to Anterior resection (AR); complete pathological response was achieved in seven (20.5%) patient; R0 resection was achieved in 34 (92%) patients; CRM was positive in three patients; two of them developed local recurrence and one of them developed distant metastasis. Conclusion: For locally
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估新辅助化疗在直肠癌治疗中的作用
.摘要 背景:目前治疗局部晚期直肠癌的标准是先进行新辅助化放疗,然后再进行手术。最近的研究强调了局部晚期直肠癌(LARC)患者在同时接受化放疗(CRT)前接受诱导化疗可能具有的优势。我们的研究评估了局部晚期直肠癌患者在同时接受化放疗前进行诱导化疗的疗效和可行性。患者和方法:40 名局部晚期直肠癌患者于 2019-2021 年加入我们的研究。最初,他们接受了为期3个月的3个周期FOLFOX(奥沙利铂、白杉醇、5氟尿嘧啶)诱导化疗方案。患者的反应评估通过盆腔磁共振成像进行。诱导化疗结束两周后,同时进行放化疗。四周后,通过盆腔磁共振成像、胸部和腹部计算机断层扫描对患者进行再次评估。放疗结束后 6-8 周进行全直肠系膜切除术。对纳入患者的 pCR、环形切除边缘(CRM)、RO切除、括约肌保留、治疗毒性、术后发病率和死亡率进行了评估。结果:在这项研究中,21 例(38%)小于或等于 5 厘米的低位直肠肿瘤患者中,有 8 例(38%)实现了括约肌保留,这些患者都是腹会阴切除术(APR)的候选者,后转为前切除术(AR);7 例(20.5%)患者实现了完全病理反应;34 例(92%)患者实现了 R0 切除;3 例患者的 CRM 呈阳性;其中 2 例出现局部复发,1 例出现远处转移。结论对于局部
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Study of the value of core biopsy for establishing tissue diagnosis compared to excisional biopsy in enlarged cervical lymph nodes Fibrin glue versus sutures for mesh fixation in open repair of inguinal hernia Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation with mucopexy versus stapled hemorrhoidopexy in the management of grades 3 and 4 prolapsed hemorrhoids: A prospective randomized clinical study Solitary fibrous tumor of the pleura Correlating preoperative clinicopathological factors with skin and/ or nipple–areola complex tumor involvement in postmastectomy specimens
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1