A mixed-methods assessment of the Australasian Society of Genetic Counselors (ASGC) Mentor Program

Holly Canton , Rebecca Macintosh , Joanna Sweeting , Helen Mountain , Jodie Ingles , Amy Nisselle , Erin Turbitt , Alison McEwen , Laura Yeates
{"title":"A mixed-methods assessment of the Australasian Society of Genetic Counselors (ASGC) Mentor Program","authors":"Holly Canton ,&nbsp;Rebecca Macintosh ,&nbsp;Joanna Sweeting ,&nbsp;Helen Mountain ,&nbsp;Jodie Ingles ,&nbsp;Amy Nisselle ,&nbsp;Erin Turbitt ,&nbsp;Alison McEwen ,&nbsp;Laura Yeates","doi":"10.1016/j.gimo.2024.101865","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>In Australia and New Zealand, one third of genetic counselors have less than 5 years’ experience. Sharing experienced practitioners’ professional knowledge is needed as the profession grows. Formal mentoring is an important facilitator of career progression and shared knowledge. In 2022, the Australasian Society of Genetic Counselors developed a 6-month mentor program, matching mentees with experienced genetic counselors (&gt;10 years). We aimed to evaluate and assess the overall satisfaction and acceptability of the program, the matching process, and barriers to participation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We used an explanatory mixed-method design with cross-sectional surveys deployed at baseline and follow-up and opt-in semi-structured interviews. Interview transcripts were analyzed using codebook thematic analysis, and data were integrated in a narrative approach.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Fifteen mentors and 15 mentees (<em>N</em> = 30) from 17 dyads were included in the analysis (response rate 83%). Eighteen completed the postprogram survey, and 12 were interviewed. The majority were female (93%), European (90%), and worked clinically in public hospitals (63%). Mentors’ main reason for participating was “to give back to the next generation,” whereas mentees sought “help with career progression.” Time was a barrier to participating. The majority (89%) achieved their goals, and all participants would recommend the program. Most (61%) found the mentor/mentee matching to be excellent, and 44% believed they would continue the relationship after the program.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The Australasian Society of Genetic Counselors Mentor Program filled a gap in professional development within the Australian and New Zealand genetic counseling community and highlighted a general desire to share knowledge with new members of the profession.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100576,"journal":{"name":"Genetics in Medicine Open","volume":"2 ","pages":"Article 101865"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genetics in Medicine Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949774424010112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

In Australia and New Zealand, one third of genetic counselors have less than 5 years’ experience. Sharing experienced practitioners’ professional knowledge is needed as the profession grows. Formal mentoring is an important facilitator of career progression and shared knowledge. In 2022, the Australasian Society of Genetic Counselors developed a 6-month mentor program, matching mentees with experienced genetic counselors (>10 years). We aimed to evaluate and assess the overall satisfaction and acceptability of the program, the matching process, and barriers to participation.

Methods

We used an explanatory mixed-method design with cross-sectional surveys deployed at baseline and follow-up and opt-in semi-structured interviews. Interview transcripts were analyzed using codebook thematic analysis, and data were integrated in a narrative approach.

Results

Fifteen mentors and 15 mentees (N = 30) from 17 dyads were included in the analysis (response rate 83%). Eighteen completed the postprogram survey, and 12 were interviewed. The majority were female (93%), European (90%), and worked clinically in public hospitals (63%). Mentors’ main reason for participating was “to give back to the next generation,” whereas mentees sought “help with career progression.” Time was a barrier to participating. The majority (89%) achieved their goals, and all participants would recommend the program. Most (61%) found the mentor/mentee matching to be excellent, and 44% believed they would continue the relationship after the program.

Conclusion

The Australasian Society of Genetic Counselors Mentor Program filled a gap in professional development within the Australian and New Zealand genetic counseling community and highlighted a general desire to share knowledge with new members of the profession.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对澳大利亚遗传咨询师协会 (ASGC) 导师计划的混合方法评估
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pilot implementation study of a default genetic referral process for patients with early-onset colorectal cancer Refining the interpretation of variants of uncertain significance in hereditary cancer screening through integrated RNA sequencing An evaluation of genetic predisposition to congenital anomalies and pediatric cancer supports KAT6B as a novel neuroblastoma susceptibility gene College of American Pathologists (CAP)/American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) proficiency testing for urinary glycosaminoglycan analysis: A summary of performance Genome sequencing enhances the diagnostic yield and expands the genetic landscape of male breast cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1