Wen Wen , Sen Zhao , Yiwen Jiang , Chengzhu Ou , Changyuan Guo , Ziqi Jia , Jiayi Li , Yansong Huang , Hengyi Xu , Pengming Pu , Tongxuan Shang , Lin Cong , Xiang Wang , Nan Wu , Jiaqi Liu
{"title":"Genome sequencing enhances the diagnostic yield and expands the genetic landscape of male breast cancer","authors":"Wen Wen , Sen Zhao , Yiwen Jiang , Chengzhu Ou , Changyuan Guo , Ziqi Jia , Jiayi Li , Yansong Huang , Hengyi Xu , Pengming Pu , Tongxuan Shang , Lin Cong , Xiang Wang , Nan Wu , Jiaqi Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.gimo.2024.101899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To understand the broader genetic landscape of male breast cancer (MBC), focusing on the utility of genome sequencing (GS) beyond <em>BRCA1/2</em> (HGNC: 1100, 1101) variants.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Twenty-four patients with MBC underwent a multistep genetic analysis. Initial screening targeted <em>BRCA1/2</em> variants followed by GS to identify pathogenic/likely pathogenic germline variants through a 3-tiered classification. Polygenic risk score analysis was further incorporated using a model for female breast cancer with 2666 noncancer controls. Exome sequencing was used to transition from germline to somatic investigations, assessing second-hit variant and mutational signatures.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The GS analysis unveiled previously unrecognized pathogenic/likely pathogenic germline variants in <em>BARD1</em>, <em>ATR</em>, <em>BRIP1</em>, and <em>CHEK2</em> (HGNC: 952, 882, 20473, 16627) among 21 <em>BRCA1/2-</em>negative patients with MBC, elevating the diagnostic yield from 12.5% to 33.0% in all MBC. Elevated average polygenic risk score was noted compared with controls, with a significant correlation to early-onset MBC when combined with high-penetrance germline pathogenic variants (<em>P =</em> 1.10 × 10<sup>−4</sup>). Exome sequencing analysis further identified significant somatic oncogenic drivers and revealed a dominant mutational signature SBS3 across <em>BRCA1/2-</em>negative samples, reinforcing the contribution of omologous recombination deficiency underlying the MBC development.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our findings extended the MBC genetic spectrum beyond BRCA1/2 and highlighted the intricate interplay of monogenic and polygenic predispositions, presenting a comprehensive MBC genomic profile.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100576,"journal":{"name":"Genetics in Medicine Open","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 101899"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genetics in Medicine Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949774424010458","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
To understand the broader genetic landscape of male breast cancer (MBC), focusing on the utility of genome sequencing (GS) beyond BRCA1/2 (HGNC: 1100, 1101) variants.
Methods
Twenty-four patients with MBC underwent a multistep genetic analysis. Initial screening targeted BRCA1/2 variants followed by GS to identify pathogenic/likely pathogenic germline variants through a 3-tiered classification. Polygenic risk score analysis was further incorporated using a model for female breast cancer with 2666 noncancer controls. Exome sequencing was used to transition from germline to somatic investigations, assessing second-hit variant and mutational signatures.
Results
The GS analysis unveiled previously unrecognized pathogenic/likely pathogenic germline variants in BARD1, ATR, BRIP1, and CHEK2 (HGNC: 952, 882, 20473, 16627) among 21 BRCA1/2-negative patients with MBC, elevating the diagnostic yield from 12.5% to 33.0% in all MBC. Elevated average polygenic risk score was noted compared with controls, with a significant correlation to early-onset MBC when combined with high-penetrance germline pathogenic variants (P = 1.10 × 10−4). Exome sequencing analysis further identified significant somatic oncogenic drivers and revealed a dominant mutational signature SBS3 across BRCA1/2-negative samples, reinforcing the contribution of omologous recombination deficiency underlying the MBC development.
Conclusion
Our findings extended the MBC genetic spectrum beyond BRCA1/2 and highlighted the intricate interplay of monogenic and polygenic predispositions, presenting a comprehensive MBC genomic profile.