College of American Pathologists (CAP)/American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) proficiency testing for urinary glycosaminoglycan analysis: A summary of performance

Kristina Cusmano-Ozog , Dietrich Matern , Thomas Long , Nicola Longo , Sarah Young
{"title":"College of American Pathologists (CAP)/American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) proficiency testing for urinary glycosaminoglycan analysis: A summary of performance","authors":"Kristina Cusmano-Ozog ,&nbsp;Dietrich Matern ,&nbsp;Thomas Long ,&nbsp;Nicola Longo ,&nbsp;Sarah Young","doi":"10.1016/j.gimo.2024.101912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) accumulate in patients with mucopolysaccharidoses (MPS), multiple sulfatase deficiency, and mucolipidoses; measurement of total GAGs and the specific excretion pattern by fractionation can aid in their diagnosis. Since 1993, the College of American Pathologists with the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics has offered proficiency testing (PT) for urine GAG analysis accessible to laboratories worldwide.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data from PT surveys administered from 2016 to 2022 were assessed for trends in participation and methodological platforms used, as well as analytical performance and diagnostic accuracy by method and disease.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The number of participating laboratories declined from 43 in 2016 to 28 in 2022. Fourteen urine samples with clinical vignettes were distributed; the median of correct diagnoses reported was 91.5% (range: 74%-100%). The best performing methodologies for total GAG analysis and fractionation were dimethylmethylene blue-dye-binding spectrophotometric assay and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, respectively. MPS IV samples posed the greatest diagnostic challenge, whereas the overall false-positive rate was low.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Based on the data reviewed, best patient care for those at risk of an MPS is achieved by a combination of total GAG analysis and GAG fractionation. Development of liquid-chromatography-tandem-mass-spectrometry-based methods for quantitative, differentiated GAG analysis or disease-specific GAG-derived nonreducing end oligosaccharide fragments in combination with multiplexed lysosomal enzyme assays will likely improve diagnostic accuracy. The decline of laboratories participating in PT is concerning because MPS are increasingly included in newborn screening programs and urinary GAGs can be used to monitor the effectiveness of new therapies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100576,"journal":{"name":"Genetics in Medicine Open","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 101912"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genetics in Medicine Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949774424010586","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) accumulate in patients with mucopolysaccharidoses (MPS), multiple sulfatase deficiency, and mucolipidoses; measurement of total GAGs and the specific excretion pattern by fractionation can aid in their diagnosis. Since 1993, the College of American Pathologists with the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics has offered proficiency testing (PT) for urine GAG analysis accessible to laboratories worldwide.

Methods

Data from PT surveys administered from 2016 to 2022 were assessed for trends in participation and methodological platforms used, as well as analytical performance and diagnostic accuracy by method and disease.

Results

The number of participating laboratories declined from 43 in 2016 to 28 in 2022. Fourteen urine samples with clinical vignettes were distributed; the median of correct diagnoses reported was 91.5% (range: 74%-100%). The best performing methodologies for total GAG analysis and fractionation were dimethylmethylene blue-dye-binding spectrophotometric assay and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, respectively. MPS IV samples posed the greatest diagnostic challenge, whereas the overall false-positive rate was low.

Conclusion

Based on the data reviewed, best patient care for those at risk of an MPS is achieved by a combination of total GAG analysis and GAG fractionation. Development of liquid-chromatography-tandem-mass-spectrometry-based methods for quantitative, differentiated GAG analysis or disease-specific GAG-derived nonreducing end oligosaccharide fragments in combination with multiplexed lysosomal enzyme assays will likely improve diagnostic accuracy. The decline of laboratories participating in PT is concerning because MPS are increasingly included in newborn screening programs and urinary GAGs can be used to monitor the effectiveness of new therapies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pilot implementation study of a default genetic referral process for patients with early-onset colorectal cancer Refining the interpretation of variants of uncertain significance in hereditary cancer screening through integrated RNA sequencing An evaluation of genetic predisposition to congenital anomalies and pediatric cancer supports KAT6B as a novel neuroblastoma susceptibility gene College of American Pathologists (CAP)/American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) proficiency testing for urinary glycosaminoglycan analysis: A summary of performance Genome sequencing enhances the diagnostic yield and expands the genetic landscape of male breast cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1