Evaluation history of dietary food groups and nutritional habits of individuals diagnosed with a memory disorder: a case–control study

Seyedeh Narjes Marashi, S. Amini, Setayesh Ebrahimian
{"title":"Evaluation history of dietary food groups and nutritional habits of individuals diagnosed with a memory disorder: a case–control study","authors":"Seyedeh Narjes Marashi, S. Amini, Setayesh Ebrahimian","doi":"10.1108/nfs-12-2023-0296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose\nCognitive decline and dementia are major causes of disability. Research has suggested a relationship between dietary intake and memory problems in individuals. This study aims to examine the dietary histories of participants with newly diagnosed memory problems.\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA total of 285 subjects (129 cases and 156 controls) were included in this retrospective case−control study. This paper used a food frequency questionnaire to determine the intake of dietary food groups in the previous year and a general questionnaire to assess food habits. The strength of the association between dietary history and memory problems was assessed using logistic regression and Pearson’s tests.\n\nFindings\nIn this study, 73% of participants had a lower middle income and consumed less than the recommended number of meats, fruits and vegetables (1.2, 1.8 and 0.99 units/day, respectively). Participants with memory problems were more likely to take supplements than those without (P = 0.01). There was no significant difference in energy intake between the case and control groups (1634 Kcal vs 1656 Kcal). The results of the logistic regression showed that consuming any of the food groups in the previous nine months was not associated with memory problems. However, the Pearson test showed that an increase in the consumption of high-quality protein and vegetables had a slightly nonsignificant relationship with a decrease in the severity of memory disorder.\n\nOriginality/value\nIt is safe to suggest consuming adequate amounts of high-quality protein and affordable protein from sources such as dairy products, meats and vegetables. Research is insufficient to recommend the use of dietary supplements as a means of preventing memory disorders.\n","PeriodicalId":509279,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition & Food Science","volume":"82 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition & Food Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/nfs-12-2023-0296","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Cognitive decline and dementia are major causes of disability. Research has suggested a relationship between dietary intake and memory problems in individuals. This study aims to examine the dietary histories of participants with newly diagnosed memory problems. Design/methodology/approach A total of 285 subjects (129 cases and 156 controls) were included in this retrospective case−control study. This paper used a food frequency questionnaire to determine the intake of dietary food groups in the previous year and a general questionnaire to assess food habits. The strength of the association between dietary history and memory problems was assessed using logistic regression and Pearson’s tests. Findings In this study, 73% of participants had a lower middle income and consumed less than the recommended number of meats, fruits and vegetables (1.2, 1.8 and 0.99 units/day, respectively). Participants with memory problems were more likely to take supplements than those without (P = 0.01). There was no significant difference in energy intake between the case and control groups (1634 Kcal vs 1656 Kcal). The results of the logistic regression showed that consuming any of the food groups in the previous nine months was not associated with memory problems. However, the Pearson test showed that an increase in the consumption of high-quality protein and vegetables had a slightly nonsignificant relationship with a decrease in the severity of memory disorder. Originality/value It is safe to suggest consuming adequate amounts of high-quality protein and affordable protein from sources such as dairy products, meats and vegetables. Research is insufficient to recommend the use of dietary supplements as a means of preventing memory disorders.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
被诊断患有记忆障碍的人的膳食食物种类和营养习惯评估史:一项病例对照研究
目的认知能力下降和痴呆症是导致残疾的主要原因。研究表明,饮食摄入量与个人记忆问题之间存在一定关系。本研究旨在调查新诊断出有记忆问题的参与者的饮食史。设计/方法/途径本回顾性病例对照研究共纳入 285 名受试者(129 例病例和 156 例对照)。本文使用食物频率问卷来确定前一年的膳食食物种类摄入量,并使用普通问卷来评估饮食习惯。研究结果 在这项研究中,73%的参与者收入处于中等偏下水平,肉类、水果和蔬菜的摄入量低于建议摄入量(分别为 1.2、1.8 和 0.99 个单位/天)。有记忆问题的参与者比没有记忆问题的参与者更倾向于服用营养补充剂(P = 0.01)。病例组和对照组的能量摄入量没有明显差异(1634 千卡对 1656 千卡)。逻辑回归结果显示,在过去九个月中食用任何一类食物都与记忆问题无关。不过,皮尔逊测试表明,优质蛋白质和蔬菜摄入量的增加与记忆障碍严重程度的下降之间存在轻微的非显著关系。 原创性/价值 建议从乳制品、肉类和蔬菜等来源摄入足量的优质蛋白质和负担得起的蛋白质是安全的。目前还没有足够的研究建议使用膳食补充剂来预防记忆障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Probiotic soy beverages: a functional beverage on lipid profile, oxidative stress and kidney function: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials Probiotic soy beverages: a functional beverage on lipid profile, oxidative stress and kidney function: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials Pharmacological properties and stability of natural–colored foods: a literature review Ashwagandha: botanic occurrence, conventional uses, and significance in heart, metabolic, renal and hepatic disorder Evaluating women’s knowledge about dietary supplement use during pregnancy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1