Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in elderly patients: A matched case-control study

Hosam B. Barakat, Ahmed Badran, Mohamed Elsheikh
{"title":"Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in elderly patients: A matched case-control study","authors":"Hosam B. Barakat, Ahmed Badran, Mohamed Elsheikh","doi":"10.21608/ejsur.2024.357119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Despite the increasing prevalence of obesity among elderly individuals, there is ongoing debate regarding the safety of bariatric procedures in this age group. Objective: This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), specifically in patients aged 55 years and older. Patients and Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on patients subjected to LSG in our institution from 2019 to 2023. Forty elderly patients more than or equal to 55 years were included (study group) and were matched with forty younger patients (control group) based on BMI, sex, and comorbidities distribution. The study compared short-term outcomes regarding weight loss, comorbidities improvement, operative time, hospital stay, and complications. Results: There were no significant differences regarding the demographic characteristics or preoperative comorbidities distribution within the two groups. The mean operative time was slightly longer in the older patients than in the control group (53.85±12.17 vs. 49.25±16.22 min, respectively), but with no statistical significance. There was no perioperative mortality in both groups. The percent excess weight loss at 1 year for the older group was significantly lower than that for the younger group (58.1 vs. 68.74%. respectively). Most comorbidities in both groups were improved or resolved with no significant statistical. The morbidity rate was 15 and 17.5% for the elderly and the younger group, respectively, with no significant difference. Conclusion: LSG is safe and effective in patients more than or equal to 55 years and presents a valuable bariatric option that is efficient in inducing weight loss and improving obesity-related comorbidities and is associated with an acceptable morbidity rate comparable to younger populations.","PeriodicalId":22550,"journal":{"name":"The Egyptian Journal of Surgery","volume":"73 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Egyptian Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ejsur.2024.357119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite the increasing prevalence of obesity among elderly individuals, there is ongoing debate regarding the safety of bariatric procedures in this age group. Objective: This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), specifically in patients aged 55 years and older. Patients and Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on patients subjected to LSG in our institution from 2019 to 2023. Forty elderly patients more than or equal to 55 years were included (study group) and were matched with forty younger patients (control group) based on BMI, sex, and comorbidities distribution. The study compared short-term outcomes regarding weight loss, comorbidities improvement, operative time, hospital stay, and complications. Results: There were no significant differences regarding the demographic characteristics or preoperative comorbidities distribution within the two groups. The mean operative time was slightly longer in the older patients than in the control group (53.85±12.17 vs. 49.25±16.22 min, respectively), but with no statistical significance. There was no perioperative mortality in both groups. The percent excess weight loss at 1 year for the older group was significantly lower than that for the younger group (58.1 vs. 68.74%. respectively). Most comorbidities in both groups were improved or resolved with no significant statistical. The morbidity rate was 15 and 17.5% for the elderly and the younger group, respectively, with no significant difference. Conclusion: LSG is safe and effective in patients more than or equal to 55 years and presents a valuable bariatric option that is efficient in inducing weight loss and improving obesity-related comorbidities and is associated with an acceptable morbidity rate comparable to younger populations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年患者腹腔镜袖带胃切除术的安全性和有效性:匹配病例对照研究
背景:尽管肥胖症在老年人中的发病率越来越高,但关于在这一年龄组中进行减肥手术的安全性却一直存在争议。研究目的本研究旨在评估腹腔镜袖带胃切除术(LSG)的疗效和安全性,尤其是 55 岁及以上患者的疗效和安全性。患者和方法:对本机构 2019 年至 2023 年期间接受 LSG 的患者进行回顾性分析。根据体重指数(BMI)、性别和合并症分布,纳入 40 名大于或等于 55 岁的老年患者(研究组),并与 40 名年轻患者(对照组)进行配对。研究比较了体重减轻、合并症改善、手术时间、住院时间和并发症等方面的短期结果。研究结果两组患者的人口统计学特征和术前合并症分布无明显差异。老年患者的平均手术时间略长于对照组(分别为(53.85±12.17)分钟和(49.25±16.22)分钟),但无统计学意义。两组患者均无围术期死亡率。老年组 1 年后的超重百分比明显低于年轻组(分别为 58.1% 对 68.74%)。两组患者的大多数合并症都得到了改善或解决,无明显统计学差异。老年组和年轻组的发病率分别为 15% 和 17.5%,无明显差异。结论LSG对55岁以上的患者安全有效,是一种有价值的减肥方法,能有效减轻体重,改善肥胖相关的合并症,其发病率与年轻人相当,可以接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Study of the value of core biopsy for establishing tissue diagnosis compared to excisional biopsy in enlarged cervical lymph nodes Fibrin glue versus sutures for mesh fixation in open repair of inguinal hernia Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation with mucopexy versus stapled hemorrhoidopexy in the management of grades 3 and 4 prolapsed hemorrhoids: A prospective randomized clinical study Solitary fibrous tumor of the pleura Correlating preoperative clinicopathological factors with skin and/ or nipple–areola complex tumor involvement in postmastectomy specimens
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1