The Comparison of Dry Hydrostatic Delay Measurement from GPS Ground-Based and Space- Based Receiver

Q3 Engineering Journal of Communications Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.12720/jcm.19.6.281-286
Rohaniza M. Zali, Mandeep J. S.
{"title":"The Comparison of Dry Hydrostatic Delay Measurement from GPS Ground-Based and Space- Based Receiver","authors":"Rohaniza M. Zali, Mandeep J. S.","doi":"10.12720/jcm.19.6.281-286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"—Tropospheric delay is a significant cause of the Global Navigation Satellite System’s (GNSS) services degrading, particularly when it comes to the geodetic estimation of coordinates on the surface of the planet. To quantify the delay brought on by the abnormalities in the tropospheric layer, researchers have employed a variety of methods. Since Global Positioning System Radio Occultation (GPS-RO) systems and the Global Positioning System (GPS) ground network estimate the tropospheric delay differently, we examined this measurement difference in this study. Therefore, this study has been performed to analyze the dry delay measurement from the ground-based station and validate it with the reprocessing data from the space-based station to understand the correlation of measurement between these two methods. The MetopA gave the worldwide delay data, while the 92 SuomiNet Network GPS stations, which cover the majority of the United States region, provided their measurement of the delay utilizing the element of slant water along the GPS ray while the MetopA provided the global data with around 150 selected data per day and analysis was conducted for the data in the year 2020. Hence, due to the difference in spatial data distribution between these two types of data, the mean value has been measured for each of the latitude zones, the result shows the minimum bias of 0.67 cm and RMSE 4.51 cm at the − 30⁰ to − 60⁰ and the maximum bias of 3.74 cm and RMSE 25.1 cm at the 30⁰ to 60⁰ latitude. Overall bias and Root Mean Square Error ( RMSE) are 1.41 cm and 23.2 cm respectively which shows a good agreement between space-based and ground-based measurement that will help for better error modeling development in the future.","PeriodicalId":53518,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Communications","volume":"68 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12720/jcm.19.6.281-286","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

—Tropospheric delay is a significant cause of the Global Navigation Satellite System’s (GNSS) services degrading, particularly when it comes to the geodetic estimation of coordinates on the surface of the planet. To quantify the delay brought on by the abnormalities in the tropospheric layer, researchers have employed a variety of methods. Since Global Positioning System Radio Occultation (GPS-RO) systems and the Global Positioning System (GPS) ground network estimate the tropospheric delay differently, we examined this measurement difference in this study. Therefore, this study has been performed to analyze the dry delay measurement from the ground-based station and validate it with the reprocessing data from the space-based station to understand the correlation of measurement between these two methods. The MetopA gave the worldwide delay data, while the 92 SuomiNet Network GPS stations, which cover the majority of the United States region, provided their measurement of the delay utilizing the element of slant water along the GPS ray while the MetopA provided the global data with around 150 selected data per day and analysis was conducted for the data in the year 2020. Hence, due to the difference in spatial data distribution between these two types of data, the mean value has been measured for each of the latitude zones, the result shows the minimum bias of 0.67 cm and RMSE 4.51 cm at the − 30⁰ to − 60⁰ and the maximum bias of 3.74 cm and RMSE 25.1 cm at the 30⁰ to 60⁰ latitude. Overall bias and Root Mean Square Error ( RMSE) are 1.41 cm and 23.2 cm respectively which shows a good agreement between space-based and ground-based measurement that will help for better error modeling development in the future.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全球定位系统地基接收器与天基接收器的干静水延时测量比较
-对流层延迟是导致全球导航卫星系统(GNSS)服务质量下降的一个重要原因,尤其是在地球表面坐标的大地测量方面。为了量化对流层异常带来的延迟,研究人员采用了多种方法。由于全球定位系统无线电掩星(GPS-RO)系统和全球定位系统(GPS)地面网络对对流层延迟的估计不同,我们在本研究中对这种测量差异进行了研究。因此,本研究分析了地面站的干延迟测量数据,并与天基站的再处理数据进行了验证,以了解这两种方法之间的测量相关性。MetopA 提供了全球延迟数据,而覆盖美国大部分地区的 92 个 SuomiNet 网络全球定位系统站则利用全球定位系统射线沿线的斜面水元素提供延迟测量数据,而 MetopA 提供的全球数据每天约有 150 个选定数据,并对 2020 年的数据进行了分析。因此,由于这两类数据在空间分布上的差异,对每个纬度区的平均值进行了测量,结果表明,在-30⁰至-60⁰纬度区的偏差最小,为 0.67 厘米,均方根误差(RMSE)为 4.51 厘米;在 30⁰至 60⁰纬度区的偏差最大,为 3.74 厘米,均方根误差(RMSE)为 25.1 厘米。总体偏差和均方根误差(RMSE)分别为 1.41 厘米和 23.2 厘米,这表明天基测量与地基测量之间具有良好的一致性,有助于今后更好地建立误差模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Communications
Journal of Communications Engineering-Electrical and Electronic Engineering
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: JCM is a scholarly peer-reviewed international scientific journal published monthly, focusing on theories, systems, methods, algorithms and applications in communications. It provide a high profile, leading edge forum for academic researchers, industrial professionals, engineers, consultants, managers, educators and policy makers working in the field to contribute and disseminate innovative new work on communications. All papers will be blind reviewed and accepted papers will be published monthly which is available online (open access) and in printed version.
期刊最新文献
Spectral-Efficient Aircraft Pairing for Massive MIMO NOMA in Aeronautical Communication Routing Protocol against Flooding Attack Using Median Value and Fixed Threshold Reduction of OFDM PAPR Using a Combined Hadamard Transformation and Selective Mapping for Terrestrial DAB+ System under Rayleigh and AWGN Channel Please Use a three-wire Watch a Novel Protocol Designed for Addressing Hidden and Exposed Layer Issues in the Medium Access Control Layer of Mobile Adhoc Network The Comparison of Dry Hydrostatic Delay Measurement from GPS Ground-Based and Space- Based Receiver
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1