Frontoparietal Brain Network Plays a Crucial Role in Working Memory Capacity during Complex Cognitive Task.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES eNeuro Pub Date : 2024-08-08 Print Date: 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1523/ENEURO.0394-23.2024
Nikita Otstavnov, Carlos Nieto-Doval, Giulia Galli, Matteo Feurra
{"title":"Frontoparietal Brain Network Plays a Crucial Role in Working Memory Capacity during Complex Cognitive Task.","authors":"Nikita Otstavnov, Carlos Nieto-Doval, Giulia Galli, Matteo Feurra","doi":"10.1523/ENEURO.0394-23.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent neurophysiological studies provide inconsistent results of frontoparietal network (FPN) stimulation for altering working memory (WM) capacity. This study aimed to boost WM capacity by manipulating the activity of the FPN via dual-site high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation. Forty-eight participants were randomly assigned to three stimulation groups, receiving either simultaneous anodal stimulation of the frontal and parietal areas (double stimulation), or stimulation of the frontal area only (single stimulation), or the placebo stimulation (sham) to frontal and parietal areas. After the stimulation, we used an operation span task to test memory accuracy, mathematical accuracy, time of calculation and memorizing, and recall response time across the three groups. The results revealed an enhancement of memory accuracy and a reduction of time of calculation in the double stimulation group compared with that in others. In addition, recall response time was significantly decreased in the double and single stimulation groups compared with that in sham. No differences in mathematical accuracy were observed. Our results confirm the pivotal role of the FPN in WM and suggest its functional dissociation, with the frontal component more implicated in the retrieval stage and the parietal component in the processing and retention stages.</p>","PeriodicalId":11617,"journal":{"name":"eNeuro","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11315429/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"eNeuro","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0394-23.2024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent neurophysiological studies provide inconsistent results of frontoparietal network (FPN) stimulation for altering working memory (WM) capacity. This study aimed to boost WM capacity by manipulating the activity of the FPN via dual-site high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation. Forty-eight participants were randomly assigned to three stimulation groups, receiving either simultaneous anodal stimulation of the frontal and parietal areas (double stimulation), or stimulation of the frontal area only (single stimulation), or the placebo stimulation (sham) to frontal and parietal areas. After the stimulation, we used an operation span task to test memory accuracy, mathematical accuracy, time of calculation and memorizing, and recall response time across the three groups. The results revealed an enhancement of memory accuracy and a reduction of time of calculation in the double stimulation group compared with that in others. In addition, recall response time was significantly decreased in the double and single stimulation groups compared with that in sham. No differences in mathematical accuracy were observed. Our results confirm the pivotal role of the FPN in WM and suggest its functional dissociation, with the frontal component more implicated in the retrieval stage and the parietal component in the processing and retention stages.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在复杂的认知任务中,大脑前顶叶网络在工作记忆能力方面发挥着至关重要的作用。
最近的神经生理学研究表明,刺激顶叶前部网络以改变工作记忆能力的结果并不一致。本研究旨在通过双部位高清晰度经颅直流电刺激来操纵额顶网络的活动,从而提高工作记忆能力。48 名参与者被随机分配到三个刺激组,分别接受同时对额叶和顶叶区域的阳极刺激(双刺激),或只对额叶区域的刺激(单刺激),或对额叶和顶叶区域的安慰剂刺激(假刺激)。刺激结束后,我们使用 "跨度运算 "任务测试三组患者的记忆准确性、数学准确性、计算和记忆时间以及回忆反应时间。结果显示,与其他组相比,双刺激组的记忆准确性有所提高,计算时间有所缩短。此外,与假刺激相比,双刺激组和单刺激组的回忆反应时间明显减少。在数学准确性方面没有观察到差异。我们的研究结果证实了额叶-顶叶网络在工作记忆中的关键作用,并表明其功能分离,额叶成分更多参与检索阶段,而顶叶成分则参与处理和保持阶段。 意义声明 在复杂的工作记忆任务中,同时进行额叶-顶叶双部位经颅直流电刺激与单部位额叶组和假刺激组相比,能显著提高成绩并缩短反应时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
eNeuro
eNeuro Neuroscience-General Neuroscience
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
486
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An open-access journal from the Society for Neuroscience, eNeuro publishes high-quality, broad-based, peer-reviewed research focused solely on the field of neuroscience. eNeuro embodies an emerging scientific vision that offers a new experience for authors and readers, all in support of the Society’s mission to advance understanding of the brain and nervous system.
期刊最新文献
Sex-Dependent Changes in Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Neuron Voltage-Gated Potassium Currents in a Mouse Model of Temporal Lobe Epilepsy. Bilateral Alignment of Receptive Fields in the Olfactory Cortex. Peripheral CaV2.2 channels in skin regulate prolonged heat hypersensitivity during neuroinflammation. The Neural Correlates of Spontaneous Beat Processing and Its Relationship with Music-Related Characteristics of the Individual. The Orbitofrontal Cortex Is Required for Learned Modulation of Innate Olfactory Behavior.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1