Biomechanical validation of novel polyurethane-resin synthetic osteoporotic femoral bones in axial compression, four-point bending and torsion

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Medical Engineering & Physics Pub Date : 2024-07-17 DOI:10.1016/j.medengphy.2024.104210
{"title":"Biomechanical validation of novel polyurethane-resin synthetic osteoporotic femoral bones in axial compression, four-point bending and torsion","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.medengphy.2024.104210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In addition to human donor bones, bone models made of synthetic materials are the gold standard substitutes for biomechanical testing of osteosyntheses. However, commercially available artificial bone models are not able to adequately reproduce the mechanical properties of human bone, especially not human osteoporotic bone.</p><p>To overcome this issue, new types of polyurethane-based synthetic osteoporotic bone models have been developed. Its base materials for the cancellous bone portion and for the cortical portion have already been morphologically and mechanically validated against human bone. Thus, the aim of this study was to combine the two validated base materials for the two bone components to produce femur models with real human geometry, one with a hollow intramedullary canal and one with an intramedullary canal filled with synthetic cancellous bone, and mechanically validate them in comparison to fresh frozen human bone.</p><p>These custom-made synthetic bone models were fabricated from a computer-tomography data set in a 2-step casting process to achieve not only the real geometry but also realistic cortical thicknesses of the femur. The synthetic bones were tested for axial compression, four-point bending in two planes, and torsion and validated against human osteoporotic bone.</p><p>The results showed that the mechanical properties of the polyurethane-based synthetic bone models with hollow intramedullary canals are in the range of those of the human osteoporotic femur. Both, the femur models with the hollow and spongy-bone-filled intramedullary canal, showed no substantial differences in bending stiffness and axial compression stiffness compared to human osteoporotic bone. Torsional stiffnesses were slightly higher but within the range of human osteoporotic femurs.</p><p>Concluding, this study shows that the innovative polyurethane-based femur models are comparable to human bones in terms of bending, axial compression, and torsional stiffness.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49836,"journal":{"name":"Medical Engineering & Physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350453324001115/pdfft?md5=606cc84da3971b382ca018299960bcd9&pid=1-s2.0-S1350453324001115-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Engineering & Physics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350453324001115","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In addition to human donor bones, bone models made of synthetic materials are the gold standard substitutes for biomechanical testing of osteosyntheses. However, commercially available artificial bone models are not able to adequately reproduce the mechanical properties of human bone, especially not human osteoporotic bone.

To overcome this issue, new types of polyurethane-based synthetic osteoporotic bone models have been developed. Its base materials for the cancellous bone portion and for the cortical portion have already been morphologically and mechanically validated against human bone. Thus, the aim of this study was to combine the two validated base materials for the two bone components to produce femur models with real human geometry, one with a hollow intramedullary canal and one with an intramedullary canal filled with synthetic cancellous bone, and mechanically validate them in comparison to fresh frozen human bone.

These custom-made synthetic bone models were fabricated from a computer-tomography data set in a 2-step casting process to achieve not only the real geometry but also realistic cortical thicknesses of the femur. The synthetic bones were tested for axial compression, four-point bending in two planes, and torsion and validated against human osteoporotic bone.

The results showed that the mechanical properties of the polyurethane-based synthetic bone models with hollow intramedullary canals are in the range of those of the human osteoporotic femur. Both, the femur models with the hollow and spongy-bone-filled intramedullary canal, showed no substantial differences in bending stiffness and axial compression stiffness compared to human osteoporotic bone. Torsional stiffnesses were slightly higher but within the range of human osteoporotic femurs.

Concluding, this study shows that the innovative polyurethane-based femur models are comparable to human bones in terms of bending, axial compression, and torsional stiffness.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新型聚氨酯树脂合成骨质疏松症股骨在轴向压缩、四点弯曲和扭转中的生物力学验证
除了人体供体骨外,合成材料制成的骨模型是骨合成物生物力学测试的金标准替代品。然而,市售的人工骨模型无法充分再现人体骨骼的机械特性,尤其是人体骨质疏松症骨骼的机械特性。其松质骨部分和皮质部分的基础材料已通过与人体骨骼的形态学和机械学验证。因此,本研究的目的是将这两种经过验证的骨组件基础材料结合起来,制作出具有真实人体几何形状的股骨模型,其中一种具有空心髓内管,另一种具有填充合成松质骨的髓内管,并与新鲜冷冻人体骨进行机械验证。这些定制的合成骨模型是根据计算机断层扫描数据集通过两步铸造工艺制作而成的,不仅具有真实的几何形状,而且具有真实的股骨皮质厚度。结果表明,带有空心髓内管的聚氨酯基合成骨模型的力学性能与人体骨质疏松股骨的力学性能相当。与人类骨质疏松股骨相比,带有中空髓内管和海绵骨填充髓内管的两种股骨模型在弯曲刚度和轴向压缩刚度方面没有实质性差异。总之,这项研究表明,基于聚氨酯的创新型股骨模型在弯曲、轴向压缩和扭转刚度方面与人类骨骼相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Engineering & Physics
Medical Engineering & Physics 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
172
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: Medical Engineering & Physics provides a forum for the publication of the latest developments in biomedical engineering, and reflects the essential multidisciplinary nature of the subject. The journal publishes in-depth critical reviews, scientific papers and technical notes. Our focus encompasses the application of the basic principles of physics and engineering to the development of medical devices and technology, with the ultimate aim of producing improvements in the quality of health care.Topics covered include biomechanics, biomaterials, mechanobiology, rehabilitation engineering, biomedical signal processing and medical device development. Medical Engineering & Physics aims to keep both engineers and clinicians abreast of the latest applications of technology to health care.
期刊最新文献
Monitoring focused ultrasound ablation surgery (FUAS) using echo amplitudes of the therapeutic focused transducer 3D bioheat transfer mapping reveals nanomagnetic particles effectiveness in radiofrequency hyperthermia breast cancer treatment comparing to experimental study Bone ingrowth in randomly distributed porous interbody cage during lumbar spinal fusion A method of nucleus image segmentation and counting based on TC-UNet++ and distance watershed Integrated analysis of clinical indicators and mechanical properties in cancellous bone
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1