Unreproductive citizenship: Social sterilisation of queer and trans people in Poland

IF 1.5 3区 社会学 Q2 WOMENS STUDIES Womens Studies International Forum Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.wsif.2024.102948
Marcin W. Smietana PhD
{"title":"Unreproductive citizenship: Social sterilisation of queer and trans people in Poland","authors":"Marcin W. Smietana PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.wsif.2024.102948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper offers the term <em>unreproductive citizenship</em> to characterise the social positionality of LGBTQ people in Poland. Unreproductive citizenship is brought about by means of <em>social sterilisation</em>: while queer and trans people are ‘tolerated,’ they are not treated as reproductive subjects with a potential to participate in social reproduction. Drawing on Polish and international literature on queer families, reproductive politics, and forced sterilisation, as well as research including interviews, political speeches and auto-ethnography, I argue that the discursive and political framing of LGBTQ people as unreproductive subjects is eugenic. Leading political figures representing Poland's robust political right-wing, as well as the majority of Poles, have expressed fears that LGBTQ reproduction could somehow ‘contaminate’ future generations and therefore poses a threat to the nation's moral order. The social sterilisation of queer Polish people as ‘unreproductive citizens’ illustrates how the logics of reproductive righteousness operate in contemporary Poland.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47940,"journal":{"name":"Womens Studies International Forum","volume":"105 ","pages":"Article 102948"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277539524000864/pdfft?md5=0568a42e0b7b719856ac33e798d4a815&pid=1-s2.0-S0277539524000864-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Womens Studies International Forum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277539524000864","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper offers the term unreproductive citizenship to characterise the social positionality of LGBTQ people in Poland. Unreproductive citizenship is brought about by means of social sterilisation: while queer and trans people are ‘tolerated,’ they are not treated as reproductive subjects with a potential to participate in social reproduction. Drawing on Polish and international literature on queer families, reproductive politics, and forced sterilisation, as well as research including interviews, political speeches and auto-ethnography, I argue that the discursive and political framing of LGBTQ people as unreproductive subjects is eugenic. Leading political figures representing Poland's robust political right-wing, as well as the majority of Poles, have expressed fears that LGBTQ reproduction could somehow ‘contaminate’ future generations and therefore poses a threat to the nation's moral order. The social sterilisation of queer Polish people as ‘unreproductive citizens’ illustrates how the logics of reproductive righteousness operate in contemporary Poland.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非生产性公民身份:波兰同性恋和变性人的社会绝育问题
本文用 "非生产性公民身份 "一词来描述波兰男女同性恋、双性恋和变性者的社会地位。非生产性公民身份是通过社会绝育的方式产生的:虽然同性恋者和跨性别者得到了 "宽容",但他们并没有被视为有可能参与社会再生产的生育主体。借鉴波兰和国际上有关同性恋家庭、生育政治和强制绝育的文献,以及包括访谈、政治演讲和自我民族志在内的研究,我认为,将 LGBTQ 人视为不能生育的主体的话语和政治框架是优生的。代表波兰强大政治右翼的主要政治人物以及大多数波兰人都表示担心,LGBTQ 的生育会以某种方式 "污染 "后代,从而对国家的道德秩序构成威胁。将波兰同性恋者作为 "不生育公民 "进行社会绝育说明了生育正义的逻辑在当代波兰是如何运作的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
63
审稿时长
79 days
期刊介绍: Women"s Studies International Forum (formerly Women"s Studies International Quarterly, established in 1978) is a bimonthly journal to aid the distribution and exchange of feminist research in the multidisciplinary, international area of women"s studies and in feminist research in other disciplines. The policy of the journal is to establish a feminist forum for discussion and debate. The journal seeks to critique and reconceptualize existing knowledge, to examine and re-evaluate the manner in which knowledge is produced and distributed, and to assess the implications this has for women"s lives.
期刊最新文献
The effect of pregnant women's childbirth beliefs on fear of childbirth Kinship support and coping with infertility: A qualitative study of women struggling with infertility from Delhi-NCR, India Editorial Board Challenging the status quo: A feminist analysis of gender dynamics, motivation, and empowerment in hackathons Thirty years of gender mainstreaming: Evolution, development, and future research agenda through a bibliometric approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1