Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in paired tap water and house dust from United States homes

Nicole M. DeLuca , Jason Boettger , Kelsey E. Miller , Christopher Fuller , Jeffrey M. Minucci , Peter J. Ashley , David Cox , Gary DeWalt , Warren Friedman , Eugene A. Pinzer , Karen D. Bradham , James McCord , Elaine A. Cohen Hubal
{"title":"Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in paired tap water and house dust from United States homes","authors":"Nicole M. DeLuca ,&nbsp;Jason Boettger ,&nbsp;Kelsey E. Miller ,&nbsp;Christopher Fuller ,&nbsp;Jeffrey M. Minucci ,&nbsp;Peter J. Ashley ,&nbsp;David Cox ,&nbsp;Gary DeWalt ,&nbsp;Warren Friedman ,&nbsp;Eugene A. Pinzer ,&nbsp;Karen D. Bradham ,&nbsp;James McCord ,&nbsp;Elaine A. Cohen Hubal","doi":"10.1016/j.indenv.2024.100033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Most people in the United States have been exposed to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) which have been linked to a wide array of adverse health conditions in adults and children. The consumption of contaminated drinking water is an important human exposure pathway to PFAS. Residential sources also contribute to PFAS exposure through dermal contact and ingestion of house dust, which acts as an aggregate of chemicals from sources like furnishing materials and consumer products. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) conducted the first nationwide survey of residential hazards called the American Healthy Homes Survey (AHHS) in 2005, followed by a second survey (AHHS II) in 2017. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) collaborated with HUD on both efforts and subsequently analyzed PFAS in household tap water and house dust collected from the same homes during the AHHS II study. This study leverages these paired samples to investigate potentially important exposure sources and pathways in the residential environment. Here we report results for paired household tap water and house dust samples from 241 homes for 13 and 16 PFAS chemicals, respectively. All 13 targeted chemicals were detected in the household tap water samples with detections ranging from 100 % for PFBS to 1 % for PFNS, and all 16 targeted chemicals were detected in the house dust samples with detections ranging from 97 % for PFOA to 9 % for PFNS. Four chemicals (PFOA, PFOS, PFHxS, and PFHpA) were measured above the limit of detection in at least 50 % of the samples in both media. All households had at least one of the targeted PFAS detected in both their tap water and house dust. Results provided evidence that geographical factors, such as proximity to ambient contamination sources, were main drivers of PFAS contamination in tap water, while PFAS contamination in house dust was driven mainly by within-home sources. Exposure estimates calculated from the measured PFAS concentrations highlight the importance of addressing potential sources of exposure to PFAS within homes in addition to ambient sources affecting communities’ drinking water, particularly to reduce children’s exposure to these chemicals.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100665,"journal":{"name":"Indoor Environments","volume":"1 3","pages":"Article 100033"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950362024000304/pdfft?md5=546f5f224fd6a43c63f66d0c04cd2098&pid=1-s2.0-S2950362024000304-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indoor Environments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950362024000304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most people in the United States have been exposed to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) which have been linked to a wide array of adverse health conditions in adults and children. The consumption of contaminated drinking water is an important human exposure pathway to PFAS. Residential sources also contribute to PFAS exposure through dermal contact and ingestion of house dust, which acts as an aggregate of chemicals from sources like furnishing materials and consumer products. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) conducted the first nationwide survey of residential hazards called the American Healthy Homes Survey (AHHS) in 2005, followed by a second survey (AHHS II) in 2017. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) collaborated with HUD on both efforts and subsequently analyzed PFAS in household tap water and house dust collected from the same homes during the AHHS II study. This study leverages these paired samples to investigate potentially important exposure sources and pathways in the residential environment. Here we report results for paired household tap water and house dust samples from 241 homes for 13 and 16 PFAS chemicals, respectively. All 13 targeted chemicals were detected in the household tap water samples with detections ranging from 100 % for PFBS to 1 % for PFNS, and all 16 targeted chemicals were detected in the house dust samples with detections ranging from 97 % for PFOA to 9 % for PFNS. Four chemicals (PFOA, PFOS, PFHxS, and PFHpA) were measured above the limit of detection in at least 50 % of the samples in both media. All households had at least one of the targeted PFAS detected in both their tap water and house dust. Results provided evidence that geographical factors, such as proximity to ambient contamination sources, were main drivers of PFAS contamination in tap water, while PFAS contamination in house dust was driven mainly by within-home sources. Exposure estimates calculated from the measured PFAS concentrations highlight the importance of addressing potential sources of exposure to PFAS within homes in addition to ambient sources affecting communities’ drinking water, particularly to reduce children’s exposure to these chemicals.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国家庭成对自来水和室内灰尘中的全氟和多氟烷基物质 (PFAS)
美国大多数人都接触过全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质 (PFAS),这些物质与成人和儿童的多种不良健康状况有关。饮用受污染的饮用水是人类接触 PFAS 的一个重要途径。通过皮肤接触和摄入室内灰尘也是接触 PFAS 的住宅来源,室内灰尘是来自家具材料和消费品等来源的化学物质的集合体。美国住房和城市发展部(HUD)于 2005 年开展了名为 "美国健康住宅调查"(AHHS)的首次全国性住宅危害调查,并于 2017 年开展了第二次调查(AHHS II)。美国环境保护署(EPA)与住房和城市发展部合作开展了这两项工作,并随后分析了 AHHS II 研究期间从相同住宅收集的家庭自来水和房屋灰尘中的 PFAS。本研究利用这些配对样本来调查住宅环境中潜在的重要暴露源和途径。在此,我们报告了对来自 241 个家庭的成对家庭自来水和室内灰尘样本分别进行 13 种和 16 种全氟辛烷磺酸化学物质检测的结果。家庭自来水样本中检测到了全部 13 种目标化学物质,其中全氟辛烷磺酸的检出率为 100%,全氟萘磺酸的检出率为 1%;家庭灰尘样本中检测到了全部 16 种目标化学物质,其中全氟辛酸的检出率为 97%,全氟萘磺酸的检出率为 9%。在两种介质中,至少 50% 的样本中检测到的四种化学物质(PFOA、PFOS、PFHxS 和 PFHpA)超过了检测限。所有家庭的自来水和室内灰尘中都检测到了至少一种目标全氟辛烷磺酸。结果证明,地理因素(如与环境污染源的距离)是自来水中 PFAS 污染的主要驱动因素,而室内灰尘中的 PFAS 污染则主要由室内污染源驱动。根据测得的全氟辛烷磺酸浓度计算出的暴露估计值突出表明,除了影响社区饮用水的环境污染源外,解决家庭中潜在的全氟辛烷磺酸暴露源也非常重要,尤其是为了减少儿童对这些化学品的暴露。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to “Ventilation characteristics in a hospital where a COVID-19 outbreak occurred in the winter of 2020” [Indoor Environ. 2 (2025) 100065] Implementing Bayesian inference on a stochastic CO2-based grey-box model CO2 levels and SARS-CoV-2 transmission in public schools: A retrospective cohort study in Montreal (Canada) Cognition, economic decision-making, and physiological response to carbon dioxide Personal air cleaning by a user-tracking robot equipped with a nanofiber air cleaner in a large work space
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1