Measuring national resilience: Israel in the first week of the Gaza war

IF 2.4 2区 社会学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL International Journal of Intercultural Relations Pub Date : 2024-07-19 DOI:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2024.102018
Shaul Kimhi , Hadas Marciano , Yohanan Eshel , Bruria Adini
{"title":"Measuring national resilience: Israel in the first week of the Gaza war","authors":"Shaul Kimhi ,&nbsp;Hadas Marciano ,&nbsp;Yohanan Eshel ,&nbsp;Bruria Adini","doi":"10.1016/j.ijintrel.2024.102018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The current study examines Israel's national resilience during the first week of the war with Gaza, as perceived by the Hebrew-speaking population. We examined the psychological variables (indicators of coping) and demographic characteristics as predictors of the mean national resilience score as well as four national resilience (NR) factors separately. Validated quantitative tools were used to collect the data from a sample of adult Israelis (n = 2002) through an internet panel. Path analyses were used to identify the variables that are associated with national resilience. The results indicate a difference between the variables found to relate to the mean composite NR index and that of each of the four factors as tested separately. The best variable that was found to relate to the composite NR as well as factor 1 (patriotism) and factor 3 (solidarity) means was hope: the higher the hope, the higher the composite NR, patriotism and solidarity reported. In contrast, the best associated with Factor 2 (trust in the government) was the degree of supporting the government, while the best associated of factor 4 (trust in state institutions was the level of religiosity. Community resilience was the second-best predictor of all factors and the composite NR score. The demographic variables of age and family income were positively associated, while religiosity and education were negatively associated with the composite NR average score. However, the demographic characteristics together explained only a small percentage of the NR average and each of its four factors. At the same time, the five coping and government support together explained more than 40 % of the composite NR mean. Practitioners and policymakers should thus invest efforts during crises to build public trust and enhance solidarity and patriotism, thereby sustaining national resilience that is vital for coping with adversities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48216,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Intercultural Relations","volume":"102 ","pages":"Article 102018"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Intercultural Relations","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147176724000877","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current study examines Israel's national resilience during the first week of the war with Gaza, as perceived by the Hebrew-speaking population. We examined the psychological variables (indicators of coping) and demographic characteristics as predictors of the mean national resilience score as well as four national resilience (NR) factors separately. Validated quantitative tools were used to collect the data from a sample of adult Israelis (n = 2002) through an internet panel. Path analyses were used to identify the variables that are associated with national resilience. The results indicate a difference between the variables found to relate to the mean composite NR index and that of each of the four factors as tested separately. The best variable that was found to relate to the composite NR as well as factor 1 (patriotism) and factor 3 (solidarity) means was hope: the higher the hope, the higher the composite NR, patriotism and solidarity reported. In contrast, the best associated with Factor 2 (trust in the government) was the degree of supporting the government, while the best associated of factor 4 (trust in state institutions was the level of religiosity. Community resilience was the second-best predictor of all factors and the composite NR score. The demographic variables of age and family income were positively associated, while religiosity and education were negatively associated with the composite NR average score. However, the demographic characteristics together explained only a small percentage of the NR average and each of its four factors. At the same time, the five coping and government support together explained more than 40 % of the composite NR mean. Practitioners and policymakers should thus invest efforts during crises to build public trust and enhance solidarity and patriotism, thereby sustaining national resilience that is vital for coping with adversities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
衡量国家复原力:加沙战争第一周的以色列
本研究考察了讲希伯来语的人群在加沙战争第一周所感受到的以色列的民族复原力。我们研究了作为民族复原力平均得分预测因素的心理变量(应对指标)和人口特征,并分别研究了四个民族复原力(NR)因素。我们使用了经过验证的定量工具,通过互联网面板从以色列成年人样本(n = 2002)中收集数据。使用路径分析来确定与民族复原力相关的变量。结果表明,与国民复原力综合指数平均值相关的变量与分别测试的四个因素中的每个因素相关的变量之间存在差异。与综合国民复原力指数以及因子 1(爱国主义)和因子 3(团结)平均值相关的最佳变量是希望:希望越高,所报告的综合国民复原力、爱国主义和团结指数就越高。相比之下,与因子 2(对政府的信任)最相关的是对政府的支持程度,而与因子 4(对国家机构的信任)最相关的是宗教信仰水平。在所有因子和 NR 综合得分中,社区复原力是第二好的预测因子。年龄和家庭收入这两个人口统计学变量与国家复原力综合平均分呈正相关,而宗教信仰和教育则呈负相关。然而,人口统计学特征加在一起只能解释 NR 平均分及其四个因子中的一小部分。同时,五种应对方式和政府支持加在一起可以解释超过 40% 的综合 NR 平均值。因此,实践者和决策者应在危机期间努力建立公众信任,加强团结和爱国主义,从而维持对应对逆境至关重要的国家复原力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
122
期刊介绍: IJIR is dedicated to advancing knowledge and understanding of theory, practice, and research in intergroup relations. The contents encompass theoretical developments, field-based evaluations of training techniques, empirical discussions of cultural similarities and differences, and critical descriptions of new training approaches. Papers selected for publication in IJIR are judged to increase our understanding of intergroup tensions and harmony. Issue-oriented and cross-discipline discussion is encouraged. The highest priority is given to manuscripts that join theory, practice, and field research design. By theory, we mean conceptual schemes focused on the nature of cultural differences and similarities.
期刊最新文献
Threats to resources and cultural values: Functional pathways to positive and negative intergroup emotions Additive and multiplicative effects of different forms of positive and negative indirect intergroup contact in predicting intergroup attitudes Israeli scientists in an American looking glass: Habitus, self-awareness and identity formation A blind spot in intergroup contact: A systematic review on predictors and outcomes of inter-minority contact experiences Acculturation in lockdown: The effects of heritage and settlement COVID-19 concern and support on well-being
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1