Parents’ differential trait, mental state, and coping talk about White and Black child storybook characters

IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Social Development Pub Date : 2024-07-20 DOI:10.1111/sode.12758
Ashley M. Fraser, Peter J. Reschke, Andrea K. Busby, Emily J. Takamasa, Jennie Jasperson, Bethany Sycamore
{"title":"Parents’ differential trait, mental state, and coping talk about White and Black child storybook characters","authors":"Ashley M. Fraser, Peter J. Reschke, Andrea K. Busby, Emily J. Takamasa, Jennie Jasperson, Bethany Sycamore","doi":"10.1111/sode.12758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Limited literature has examined parents’ unsolicited trait, mental state, and coping talk about media characters by race as they co‐view with their children. We observed 195 US parents describing an illustrated depiction of racialized social exclusion for their child (53% male; <jats:italic>M</jats:italic><jats:sub>age</jats:sub> = 5.46 years; 60% White) in their home setting. Families discussed a Black child being excluded by White children or a White child being excluded by Black children. Parents’ victim, emotion, personality, and coping talk about the excluded child were coded. Parents were more likely to use victim talk (e.g., “she's being excluded”) and emotion talk (e.g., “she's sad”) when the excluded child was Black and were more likely to use personality talk (e.g., “she's shy”) when the excluded child was White. We further explored parents’ demographic, personal, and neighborhood correlates with their trait, mental state, and coping talk. White parents with greater levels of egalitarian attitudes used more victim talk and coping talk (e.g., “she should go play with them”) about the White excluded child. Being more politically conservative was associated with White parents using more coping talk about the Black excluded child. White parents living in predominantly Black neighborhoods were less likely to use victim talk toward the Black child. BIPOC parents showed more nuanced patterns. These findings suggest that parents’ unsolicited racial messaging varies by racial identification, sociodemographic characteristics, and neighborhood context.","PeriodicalId":48203,"journal":{"name":"Social Development","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Development","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12758","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Limited literature has examined parents’ unsolicited trait, mental state, and coping talk about media characters by race as they co‐view with their children. We observed 195 US parents describing an illustrated depiction of racialized social exclusion for their child (53% male; Mage = 5.46 years; 60% White) in their home setting. Families discussed a Black child being excluded by White children or a White child being excluded by Black children. Parents’ victim, emotion, personality, and coping talk about the excluded child were coded. Parents were more likely to use victim talk (e.g., “she's being excluded”) and emotion talk (e.g., “she's sad”) when the excluded child was Black and were more likely to use personality talk (e.g., “she's shy”) when the excluded child was White. We further explored parents’ demographic, personal, and neighborhood correlates with their trait, mental state, and coping talk. White parents with greater levels of egalitarian attitudes used more victim talk and coping talk (e.g., “she should go play with them”) about the White excluded child. Being more politically conservative was associated with White parents using more coping talk about the Black excluded child. White parents living in predominantly Black neighborhoods were less likely to use victim talk toward the Black child. BIPOC parents showed more nuanced patterns. These findings suggest that parents’ unsolicited racial messaging varies by racial identification, sociodemographic characteristics, and neighborhood context.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
父母对白人和黑人儿童故事书角色的不同特质、心理状态和应对谈话
研究父母在与子女共同观看媒体时对媒体人物的主动特质、精神状态和应对方式的文献有限。我们观察了 195 位美国父母在家庭环境中描述其孩子(53% 为男性;年龄 = 5.46 岁;60% 为白人)受到种族化社会排斥的插图。这些家庭讨论了黑人孩子被白人孩子排斥或白人孩子被黑人孩子排斥的情况。对家长关于被排斥儿童的受害者、情绪、个性和应对谈话进行了编码。当被排斥的孩子是黑人时,家长更有可能使用受害者谈话(如 "她被排斥了")和情绪谈话(如 "她很伤心"),而当被排斥的孩子是白人时,家长更有可能使用个性谈话(如 "她很害羞")。我们进一步探讨了父母的人口统计学、个人和邻里关系与其特质、精神状态和应对谈话的相关性。对于被排斥的白人孩子,平等主义态度较强的白人家长使用了更多的受害者言论和应对言论(如 "她应该去和他们一起玩")。政治上更保守的白人父母对黑人受排斥儿童使用更多的应对谈话。居住在以黑人为主的社区的白人家长不太可能对黑人孩子使用受害者谈话。双性恋和变性人家长则表现出更细微的模式。这些研究结果表明,父母主动发出的种族信息因种族认同、社会人口特征和社区环境而异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Social Development
Social Development PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Social Development is a major international journal dealing with all aspects of children"s social development as seen from a psychological stance. Coverage includes a wide range of topics such as social cognition, peer relationships, social interaction, attachment formation, emotional development and children"s theories of mind. The main emphasis is placed on development in childhood, but lifespan, cross-species and cross-cultural perspectives enhancing our understanding of human development are also featured.
期刊最新文献
Loneliness in Indonesian adolescents: Associations with quantity and quality of friendship and status within and between peer groups Developmental differences in young children's implied use of cognitive resources in their self‐regulation strategies Judgements of identity claims vary for monoracial and biracial people Paternal activation parenting and growth in children's inhibitory control across early childhood Revisiting the seminal studies of attachment formation and reevaluating what it means to become attached
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1