Parent‐reported problematic lying tendencies and BIS/BAS activity as predictors of children's antisocial lie‐telling

IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Social Development Pub Date : 2024-07-17 DOI:10.1111/sode.12759
Donia Tong, Oksana Caivano, Jennifer Lavoie, Victoria Talwar
{"title":"Parent‐reported problematic lying tendencies and BIS/BAS activity as predictors of children's antisocial lie‐telling","authors":"Donia Tong, Oksana Caivano, Jennifer Lavoie, Victoria Talwar","doi":"10.1111/sode.12759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current study examined whether age and parental reports of children's problematic lying, behavioural inhibition system (BIS) activity, and reward responsiveness predicted children's antisocial lie‐telling. Children from mostly middle and upper‐class Canadian families (ages 3–12, <jats:italic>M</jats:italic> = 6.23, <jats:italic>SD</jats:italic> = 2.52) participated in a modified Temptation Resistance Paradigm (TRP), where they were given opportunities to tell a self‐protective lie (to conceal a transgression) and an instrumental lie (to obtain a reward). Parents completed measures of their children's problematic lying tendencies, BIS activity, and reward responsiveness. Age and parent‐reported problematic lying and BIS activity were significant predictors of lie‐telling behaviour in the TRP. Instrumental liars were younger than dual liars (those who told both types of lies) and truth‐tellers. Truth‐tellers had lower parent‐reported problematic lying than instrumental and dual liars but not self‐protective liars. Dual liars had lower parent‐reported BIS activity than truth‐tellers; there were no differences among truth‐tellers, self‐protective liars, and instrumental liars. This study contributes to our understanding of the role of temperamental factors in children's lie‐telling propensity and the predictive utility of parent‐reported predictors for children's antisocial lie‐telling propensity. Our findings indicate that parents can identify and potentially address their children's problematic lying using their knowledge about their children's temperamental traits.","PeriodicalId":48203,"journal":{"name":"Social Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Development","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12759","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current study examined whether age and parental reports of children's problematic lying, behavioural inhibition system (BIS) activity, and reward responsiveness predicted children's antisocial lie‐telling. Children from mostly middle and upper‐class Canadian families (ages 3–12, M = 6.23, SD = 2.52) participated in a modified Temptation Resistance Paradigm (TRP), where they were given opportunities to tell a self‐protective lie (to conceal a transgression) and an instrumental lie (to obtain a reward). Parents completed measures of their children's problematic lying tendencies, BIS activity, and reward responsiveness. Age and parent‐reported problematic lying and BIS activity were significant predictors of lie‐telling behaviour in the TRP. Instrumental liars were younger than dual liars (those who told both types of lies) and truth‐tellers. Truth‐tellers had lower parent‐reported problematic lying than instrumental and dual liars but not self‐protective liars. Dual liars had lower parent‐reported BIS activity than truth‐tellers; there were no differences among truth‐tellers, self‐protective liars, and instrumental liars. This study contributes to our understanding of the role of temperamental factors in children's lie‐telling propensity and the predictive utility of parent‐reported predictors for children's antisocial lie‐telling propensity. Our findings indicate that parents can identify and potentially address their children's problematic lying using their knowledge about their children's temperamental traits.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
家长报告的问题性说谎倾向和 BIS/BAS 活动是儿童反社会说谎的预测因素
本研究探讨了年龄和父母对儿童撒谎问题的报告、行为抑制系统(BIS)活动和奖励反应是否会预测儿童的反社会撒谎行为。大部分来自加拿大中上层家庭的儿童(3-12 岁,中位数 = 6.23,标准差 = 2.52)参加了经改进的抵制诱惑范式(TRP),在该范式中,他们有机会说自我保护性谎言(以隐瞒过失)和工具性谎言(以获得奖励)。家长完成了对孩子的问题性说谎倾向、BIS活动和奖励反应能力的测量。年龄和家长报告的问题性说谎及 BIS 活动是预测 TRP 中说谎行为的重要因素。工具性说谎者比双重说谎者(同时说两种类型的谎)和说真话者更年轻。与工具性说谎者和双重说谎者相比,说真话者的父母报告的问题性说谎率较低,但与自我保护说谎者相比,说假话者的父母报告的问题性说谎率较低。与说真话的孩子相比,双重说谎者的家长报告的 BIS 活动较少;说真话的孩子、自我保护型说谎者和工具型说谎者之间没有差异。本研究有助于我们了解气质因素在儿童说谎倾向中的作用,以及家长报告的儿童反社会说谎倾向预测因子的预测作用。我们的研究结果表明,家长可以利用他们对孩子气质特征的了解来识别并解决孩子的问题性说谎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Social Development
Social Development PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Social Development is a major international journal dealing with all aspects of children"s social development as seen from a psychological stance. Coverage includes a wide range of topics such as social cognition, peer relationships, social interaction, attachment formation, emotional development and children"s theories of mind. The main emphasis is placed on development in childhood, but lifespan, cross-species and cross-cultural perspectives enhancing our understanding of human development are also featured.
期刊最新文献
Loneliness in Indonesian adolescents: Associations with quantity and quality of friendship and status within and between peer groups Developmental differences in young children's implied use of cognitive resources in their self‐regulation strategies Judgements of identity claims vary for monoracial and biracial people Paternal activation parenting and growth in children's inhibitory control across early childhood Revisiting the seminal studies of attachment formation and reevaluating what it means to become attached
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1