Support sought and offered online for miscarriage: content analysis of a Facebook miscarriage support group.

IF 2.4 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psychology & Health Pub Date : 2024-07-22 DOI:10.1080/08870446.2024.2382790
Sophie Callen, Melissa Oxlad
{"title":"Support sought and offered online for miscarriage: content analysis of a Facebook miscarriage support group.","authors":"Sophie Callen, Melissa Oxlad","doi":"10.1080/08870446.2024.2382790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Responses to miscarriage can vary, with many, but not all, people describing inadequate support, feelings of isolation and significant psychological distress. Limited knowledge exists about the support that people seek and offer online following miscarriage. We aimed to explore how people impacted by miscarriage use an online Facebook support group to seek and offer support.</p><p><strong>Methods and measures: </strong>We employed directed content analysis to examine 270 opening posts and 3,484 responding comments within an 'open' Facebook support group for miscarriage. Opening posts and responding comments were coded into five social support categories using an existing support framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Informational Support, particularly medical information or advice, was the most commonly sought support in opening posts, followed by Emotional Support, where people expressed their grief-related feelings. In responding comments, Emotional Support and Informational Support were predominantly offered.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While not a substitute for appropriate medical care, people impacted by miscarriage seek and offer support online. Health professionals should be aware of this behaviour and discuss potential benefits and risks of online support with patients. A social support framework may usefully guide health professionals in identifying patients' support needs and in knowing how to support patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":20718,"journal":{"name":"Psychology & Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2024.2382790","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Responses to miscarriage can vary, with many, but not all, people describing inadequate support, feelings of isolation and significant psychological distress. Limited knowledge exists about the support that people seek and offer online following miscarriage. We aimed to explore how people impacted by miscarriage use an online Facebook support group to seek and offer support.

Methods and measures: We employed directed content analysis to examine 270 opening posts and 3,484 responding comments within an 'open' Facebook support group for miscarriage. Opening posts and responding comments were coded into five social support categories using an existing support framework.

Results: Informational Support, particularly medical information or advice, was the most commonly sought support in opening posts, followed by Emotional Support, where people expressed their grief-related feelings. In responding comments, Emotional Support and Informational Support were predominantly offered.

Conclusion: While not a substitute for appropriate medical care, people impacted by miscarriage seek and offer support online. Health professionals should be aware of this behaviour and discuss potential benefits and risks of online support with patients. A social support framework may usefully guide health professionals in identifying patients' support needs and in knowing how to support patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
流产时在网上寻求和提供的支持:对 Facebook 流产支持小组的内容分析。
目的:人们对流产的反应可能各不相同,许多人(但并非所有人)都描述过支持不足、孤独感和严重的心理困扰。人们对流产后在网上寻求和提供支持的了解有限。我们旨在探讨受流产影响的人如何利用 Facebook 在线支持小组寻求和提供支持:我们采用了定向内容分析法来研究一个 "开放式 "Facebook 流产支持小组中的 270 篇开篇帖子和 3,484 条回复评论。我们利用现有的支持框架将开帖和回复评论分为五个社会支持类别进行编码:信息支持,尤其是医疗信息或建议,是开篇帖子中最常寻求的支持,其次是情感支持,人们在情感支持中表达了与悲伤有关的感受。在回复评论中,人们主要提供情感支持和信息支持:结论:虽然不能替代适当的医疗护理,但受流产影响的人们会在网上寻求并提供支持。医疗专业人员应了解这种行为,并与患者讨论在线支持的潜在益处和风险。社会支持框架可有效指导医疗专业人员识别患者的支持需求,并了解如何为患者提供支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
3.00%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: Psychology & Health promotes the study and application of psychological approaches to health and illness. The contents include work on psychological aspects of physical illness, treatment processes and recovery; psychosocial factors in the aetiology of physical illnesses; health attitudes and behaviour, including prevention; the individual-health care system interface particularly communication and psychologically-based interventions. The journal publishes original research, and accepts not only papers describing rigorous empirical work, including meta-analyses, but also those outlining new psychological approaches and interventions in health-related fields.
期刊最新文献
Broad versus narrow bandwidth measures of experienced automaticity for physical activity. Fluctuations in core depressive symptoms in colorectal cancer patients. A prospective, population-based PROFILES-registry study. Understanding the experiences and psychosocial support needs of caregivers of people with comorbid dementia and cancer. Improving adult eating behaviours by manipulating time perspective: a systematic review and meta-analysis. We meat again: a field study on the moderating role of location-specific consumer preferences in nudging vegetarian options.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1