Standing against racial capitalism: Reconsidering psychology's role in dismantling systemic racism.

IF 12.3 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY American Psychologist Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1037/amp0001333
Daniel José Gaztambide, Patience Ojionuka, Sarah Simon, Jasmine Rename, Gabriella Diaz, Josh Stell
{"title":"Standing against racial capitalism: Reconsidering psychology's role in dismantling systemic racism.","authors":"Daniel José Gaztambide, Patience Ojionuka, Sarah Simon, Jasmine Rename, Gabriella Diaz, Josh Stell","doi":"10.1037/amp0001333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The American Psychological Association's resolutions on dismantling systemic racism represent a watershed moment in our discipline, yet confusion remains as to what it means to \"dismantle\" racism given psychology's emphasis on changing individual beliefs. This submission will review the tension between \"idealist\" interpretations of critical race theory emphasizing individual beliefs and \"realist\" perspectives contextualizing racism within political economic arrangements. Psychology's adoption of an \"idealist\" framework will be shown to privilege a neoliberal project emphasizing individual change and symbolic performances of racial justice instead of structural changes benefitting people of color's material existence. Drawing on a decolonial critique of racial capitalism, we propose an alternative framework to challenge our discipline to broaden its political imagination by supporting evidence-based policies to dismantle racism as a structural and political force. This includes universal policies to reduce racial and economic inequality and population-specific policies such as reparations for African Americans predicted to stimulate economic growth. Urgently, the decolonial lens challenges psychology to theorize racism not as a primarily individual phenomenon but a political force that divides and conquers while enriching white economic elites. To fulfill the promises of the American Psychological Association's resolutions, we must directly challenge the political economic interests that benefit from racism and contribute to the common good as a form of \"loving care.\" (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48468,"journal":{"name":"American Psychologist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Psychologist","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001333","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The American Psychological Association's resolutions on dismantling systemic racism represent a watershed moment in our discipline, yet confusion remains as to what it means to "dismantle" racism given psychology's emphasis on changing individual beliefs. This submission will review the tension between "idealist" interpretations of critical race theory emphasizing individual beliefs and "realist" perspectives contextualizing racism within political economic arrangements. Psychology's adoption of an "idealist" framework will be shown to privilege a neoliberal project emphasizing individual change and symbolic performances of racial justice instead of structural changes benefitting people of color's material existence. Drawing on a decolonial critique of racial capitalism, we propose an alternative framework to challenge our discipline to broaden its political imagination by supporting evidence-based policies to dismantle racism as a structural and political force. This includes universal policies to reduce racial and economic inequality and population-specific policies such as reparations for African Americans predicted to stimulate economic growth. Urgently, the decolonial lens challenges psychology to theorize racism not as a primarily individual phenomenon but a political force that divides and conquers while enriching white economic elites. To fulfill the promises of the American Psychological Association's resolutions, we must directly challenge the political economic interests that benefit from racism and contribute to the common good as a form of "loving care." (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
反对种族资本主义:重新考虑心理学在瓦解系统性种族主义中的作用。
美国心理学会关于瓦解系统性种族主义的决议代表了我们学科的一个分水岭,然而,鉴于心理学强调改变个人信仰,对于 "瓦解 "种族主义意味着什么,仍然存在困惑。本报告将回顾批判性种族理论中强调个人信仰的 "理想主义 "解释与将种族主义纳入政治经济安排的 "现实主义 "观点之间的矛盾。心理学采用的 "理想主义 "框架将被证明是新自由主义项目的特权,该项目强调个人改变和种族正义的象征性表现,而不是有利于有色人种物质生存的结构性改变。借鉴对种族资本主义的非殖民主义批判,我们提出了一个替代框架,以挑战我们的学科,通过支持以证据为基础的政策来瓦解作为结构性和政治性力量的种族主义,从而拓宽其政治想象力。这包括减少种族和经济不平等的普遍政策,以及针对特定人群的政策,如对非裔美国人的赔偿,以刺激经济增长。当务之急,非殖民主义视角对心理学提出了挑战,要求我们在理论上不要把种族主义视为一种主要是个人的现象,而是一种政治力量,它在分裂和征服的同时也使白人经济精英富裕起来。为了实现美国心理学会决议的承诺,我们必须直接挑战从种族主义中获益的政治经济利益集团,并以 "关爱 "的形式为共同利益做出贡献。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Psychologist
American Psychologist PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
18.50
自引率
1.20%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: Established in 1946, American Psychologist® is the flagship peer-reviewed scholarly journal of the American Psychological Association. It publishes high-impact papers of broad interest, including empirical reports, meta-analyses, and scholarly reviews, covering psychological science, practice, education, and policy. Articles often address issues of national and international significance within the field of psychology and its relationship to society. Published in an accessible style, contributions in American Psychologist are designed to be understood by both psychologists and the general public.
期刊最新文献
Daniel Kahneman (1934-2024). Jean Maria Arrigo (1944-2024). A quasi-experimental study examining the efficacy of multimodal bot screening tools and recommendations to preserve data integrity in online psychological research. Ascribing understanding to ourselves and others. The free will capacity: A uniquely human adaption.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1