Comparison between the sodium chloride content and labeled salt value of industrially prepared Japanese single dishes

IF 3.2 2区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Journal of Food Science Pub Date : 2024-07-23 DOI:10.1111/1750-3841.17266
Yoko Sato, Kumiko Suzuki, Runa Inagaki
{"title":"Comparison between the sodium chloride content and labeled salt value of industrially prepared Japanese single dishes","authors":"Yoko Sato,&nbsp;Kumiko Suzuki,&nbsp;Runa Inagaki","doi":"10.1111/1750-3841.17266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n \n <p>Salt intake reduction is a global concern. In particular, Japanese consume higher amounts of salt than those of other ethnicities. The sodium content is mentioned on the label of industrially prepared dishes with an intention of reducing salt intake. This study aimed to evaluate the difference between the actual sodium content and labeled salt value of industrially prepared Japanese single dishes. Samples labeled “estimated” were collected and classified as Japanese, Western, and Chinese cuisines. The sodium content ranged from 180 to 1011 mg/100 g. The sodium content was higher than their reported values in other countries. Specifically, Chinese dishes contained high amounts of sodium, although the chloride content was similar across cuisine styles. Further, the molar ratio (i.e., sodium/chloride) had no significant effect on the difference between the actual content and labeled value. The measured salt contents were 20% higher than the labeled values. The results of decision tree analysis indicated that if the labeled salt value of stir-fried foods is determined by calculation, the actual sodium content is much higher than the labeled salt value. These findings are crucial for customers, dietitian, and researchers as they refer to the labeled salt value to determine the sodium content of industrially prepared foods.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":193,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1750-3841.17266","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Salt intake reduction is a global concern. In particular, Japanese consume higher amounts of salt than those of other ethnicities. The sodium content is mentioned on the label of industrially prepared dishes with an intention of reducing salt intake. This study aimed to evaluate the difference between the actual sodium content and labeled salt value of industrially prepared Japanese single dishes. Samples labeled “estimated” were collected and classified as Japanese, Western, and Chinese cuisines. The sodium content ranged from 180 to 1011 mg/100 g. The sodium content was higher than their reported values in other countries. Specifically, Chinese dishes contained high amounts of sodium, although the chloride content was similar across cuisine styles. Further, the molar ratio (i.e., sodium/chloride) had no significant effect on the difference between the actual content and labeled value. The measured salt contents were 20% higher than the labeled values. The results of decision tree analysis indicated that if the labeled salt value of stir-fried foods is determined by calculation, the actual sodium content is much higher than the labeled salt value. These findings are crucial for customers, dietitian, and researchers as they refer to the labeled salt value to determine the sodium content of industrially prepared foods.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
工业化生产的日本单式菜肴氯化钠含量与标示盐值的比较。
减少盐的摄入量是全球关注的问题。尤其是日本人的食盐摄入量高于其他民族。在工业化生产的菜肴标签上标注钠含量的目的是为了减少盐的摄入量。本研究旨在评估工业化烹制的日本单一菜肴的实际钠含量与标签盐值之间的差异。研究收集了标有 "估计值 "的样本,并将其分为日式料理、西式料理和中式料理。钠含量介于 180 至 1011 毫克/100 克之间。具体来说,中式菜肴的钠含量较高,尽管各种菜肴的氯化物含量相似。此外,摩尔比(即钠/氯)对实际含量和标签值之间的差异没有显著影响。测得的盐含量比标注值高 20%。决策树分析结果表明,如果通过计算确定炒制食品的标示盐值,则实际钠含量远高于标示盐值。这些发现对顾客、营养师和研究人员来说至关重要,因为他们会参考标签上的盐值来确定工业制备食品的钠含量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Food Science
Journal of Food Science 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
2.60%
发文量
412
审稿时长
3.1 months
期刊介绍: The goal of the Journal of Food Science is to offer scientists, researchers, and other food professionals the opportunity to share knowledge of scientific advancements in the myriad disciplines affecting their work, through a respected peer-reviewed publication. The Journal of Food Science serves as an international forum for vital research and developments in food science. The range of topics covered in the journal include: -Concise Reviews and Hypotheses in Food Science -New Horizons in Food Research -Integrated Food Science -Food Chemistry -Food Engineering, Materials Science, and Nanotechnology -Food Microbiology and Safety -Sensory and Consumer Sciences -Health, Nutrition, and Food -Toxicology and Chemical Food Safety The Journal of Food Science publishes peer-reviewed articles that cover all aspects of food science, including safety and nutrition. Reviews should be 15 to 50 typewritten pages (including tables, figures, and references), should provide in-depth coverage of a narrowly defined topic, and should embody careful evaluation (weaknesses, strengths, explanation of discrepancies in results among similar studies) of all pertinent studies, so that insightful interpretations and conclusions can be presented. Hypothesis papers are especially appropriate in pioneering areas of research or important areas that are afflicted by scientific controversy.
期刊最新文献
Curcumin-mediated photodynamic treatment to extend the postharvest shelf-life of strawberries. Issue Information Industrial applications of selected JFS articles Industrial applications of selected JFS articles Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1