Cause-specific hazard Cox models with partly interval censoring - Penalized likelihood estimation using Gaussian quadrature.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Statistical Methods in Medical Research Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-25 DOI:10.1177/09622802241262526
Joseph Descallar, Jun Ma, Houying Zhu, Stephane Heritier, Rory Wolfe
{"title":"Cause-specific hazard Cox models with partly interval censoring - Penalized likelihood estimation using Gaussian quadrature.","authors":"Joseph Descallar, Jun Ma, Houying Zhu, Stephane Heritier, Rory Wolfe","doi":"10.1177/09622802241262526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The cause-specific hazard Cox model is widely used in analyzing competing risks survival data, and the partial likelihood method is a standard approach when survival times contain only right censoring. In practice, however, interval-censored survival times often arise, and this means the partial likelihood method is not directly applicable. Two common remedies in practice are (i) to replace each censoring interval with a single value, such as the middle point; or (ii) to redefine the event of interest, such as the time to diagnosis instead of the time to recurrence of a disease. However, the mid-point approach can cause biased parameter estimates. In this article, we develop a penalized likelihood approach to fit semi-parametric cause-specific hazard Cox models, and this method is general enough to allow left, right, and interval censoring times. Penalty functions are used to regularize the baseline hazard estimates and also to make these estimates less affected by the number and location of knots used for the estimates. We will provide asymptotic properties for the estimated parameters. A simulation study is designed to compare our method with the mid-point partial likelihood approach. We apply our method to the Aspirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE) study, illustrating an application of our proposed method.</p>","PeriodicalId":22038,"journal":{"name":"Statistical Methods in Medical Research","volume":" ","pages":"1531-1545"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11523552/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistical Methods in Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09622802241262526","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The cause-specific hazard Cox model is widely used in analyzing competing risks survival data, and the partial likelihood method is a standard approach when survival times contain only right censoring. In practice, however, interval-censored survival times often arise, and this means the partial likelihood method is not directly applicable. Two common remedies in practice are (i) to replace each censoring interval with a single value, such as the middle point; or (ii) to redefine the event of interest, such as the time to diagnosis instead of the time to recurrence of a disease. However, the mid-point approach can cause biased parameter estimates. In this article, we develop a penalized likelihood approach to fit semi-parametric cause-specific hazard Cox models, and this method is general enough to allow left, right, and interval censoring times. Penalty functions are used to regularize the baseline hazard estimates and also to make these estimates less affected by the number and location of knots used for the estimates. We will provide asymptotic properties for the estimated parameters. A simulation study is designed to compare our method with the mid-point partial likelihood approach. We apply our method to the Aspirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE) study, illustrating an application of our proposed method.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
具有部分区间普查的特定病因危险 Cox 模型 - 利用高斯正交进行惩罚似然估计。
特定原因危险 Cox 模型被广泛用于分析竞争风险生存数据,当生存时间只包含右删失时,部分似然法是一种标准方法。然而,在实际应用中,往往会出现间隔删失的生存时间,这就意味着偏似然法不能直接适用。在实践中有两种常见的补救方法:(i) 用单一值(如中间点)代替每个删失区间;或 (ii) 重新定义感兴趣的事件,如用诊断时间代替疾病复发时间。然而,中点法可能会导致参数估计偏差。在本文中,我们开发了一种惩罚似然法来拟合半参数病因特异性危险 Cox 模型,这种方法具有足够的通用性,允许左侧、右侧和区间普查时间。惩罚函数用于正则化基线危险估计值,并使这些估计值较少受到用于估计的结点数量和位置的影响。我们将提供估计参数的渐近特性。我们设计了一项模拟研究,将我们的方法与中点部分似然法进行比较。我们将我们的方法应用于阿司匹林在减少老年人事件中的作用(ASPREE)研究,以说明我们提出的方法的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Statistical Methods in Medical Research
Statistical Methods in Medical Research 医学-数学与计算生物学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
127
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Statistical Methods in Medical Research is a peer reviewed scholarly journal and is the leading vehicle for articles in all the main areas of medical statistics and an essential reference for all medical statisticians. This unique journal is devoted solely to statistics and medicine and aims to keep professionals abreast of the many powerful statistical techniques now available to the medical profession. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
期刊最新文献
LASSO-type instrumental variable selection methods with an application to Mendelian randomization. Estimating an adjusted risk difference in a cluster randomized trial with individual-level analyses. Testing for a treatment effect in a selected subgroup. Enhancing DHA supplementation adherence: A Bayesian approach with finite mixture models and irregular interim schedules in adaptive trial designs. Analysis of recurrent event data with spatial random effects using a Bayesian approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1