Charlotte L Parbery-Clark, Jennie Sofia Portice, Sarah Sowden
{"title":"Realities of opioid and gabapentinoid deprescribing in socioeconomically disadvantaged communities: a qualitative evaluation.","authors":"Charlotte L Parbery-Clark, Jennie Sofia Portice, Sarah Sowden","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Opioid and gabapentinoid prescribing has increased substantially in recent years despite having limited effectiveness in treating chronic primary pain. This is concerning, with the prescribing rates and adverse effects of these medications being higher in more socioeconomically disadvantaged groups. Guidance for prescribing and deprescribing these medications exists but the understanding of how deprescribing is operationalised, especially in areas of socioeconomic disadvantage, is limited.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore primary healthcare professionals' views and experiences of designing and implementing an intervention to reduce opioid and gabapentinoid prescribing.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>A qualitative evaluation, using participant observation and semi-structured interviews with primary healthcare professionals, working in practices serving areas of substantial socioeconomic disadvantage in the North East of England.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Interviewees were purposively recruited with subsequent snowballing with participant observation of the peer-support meetings. Interview transcripts and notes from the participant observation were inductively coded and thematically analysed.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Thirteen healthcare professionals from five practices were interviewed. Person-centred care with shared decision-making was strived for, which was time-consuming owing to the complexity of the problem and patients. Where shared decision-making was not possible, owing to patient refusal or non-engagement, risk was used to determine the appropriate action. This work involved an emotional toll on staff and patients, but was at times conversely easier and more rewarding than expected. Ultimately, demedicalising pain with a culture change is required to ensure patients are not prescribed these medications for inappropriate reasons or doses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates key operational aspects to consider when undertaking opioid and gabapentinoid deprescribing in primary care, such as funding dedicated time to enable deprescribing.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Opioid and gabapentinoid prescribing has increased substantially in recent years despite having limited effectiveness in treating chronic primary pain. This is concerning, with the prescribing rates and adverse effects of these medications being higher in more socioeconomically disadvantaged groups. Guidance for prescribing and deprescribing these medications exists but the understanding of how deprescribing is operationalised, especially in areas of socioeconomic disadvantage, is limited.
Aim: To explore primary healthcare professionals' views and experiences of designing and implementing an intervention to reduce opioid and gabapentinoid prescribing.
Design & setting: A qualitative evaluation, using participant observation and semi-structured interviews with primary healthcare professionals, working in practices serving areas of substantial socioeconomic disadvantage in the North East of England.
Method: Interviewees were purposively recruited with subsequent snowballing with participant observation of the peer-support meetings. Interview transcripts and notes from the participant observation were inductively coded and thematically analysed.
Result: Thirteen healthcare professionals from five practices were interviewed. Person-centred care with shared decision-making was strived for, which was time-consuming owing to the complexity of the problem and patients. Where shared decision-making was not possible, owing to patient refusal or non-engagement, risk was used to determine the appropriate action. This work involved an emotional toll on staff and patients, but was at times conversely easier and more rewarding than expected. Ultimately, demedicalising pain with a culture change is required to ensure patients are not prescribed these medications for inappropriate reasons or doses.
Conclusion: This study demonstrates key operational aspects to consider when undertaking opioid and gabapentinoid deprescribing in primary care, such as funding dedicated time to enable deprescribing.