National rollout of a medication safety dashboard to improve testing for latent infections among biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying agent users within the Veterans Health Administration.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health Services Research Pub Date : 2024-07-26 DOI:10.1111/1475-6773.14363
Gabriela Schmajuk, Anna Ware, Jing Li, Gary Tarasovsky, Stephen Shiboski, Jennifer L Barton, Karla L Miller, Holly A Mitchell, Jo Dana, Kimberly Reiter, Elizabeth Wahl, Karine Rozenberg-Ben-Dror, Ronald G Hauser, Mary A Whooley
{"title":"National rollout of a medication safety dashboard to improve testing for latent infections among biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying agent users within the Veterans Health Administration.","authors":"Gabriela Schmajuk, Anna Ware, Jing Li, Gary Tarasovsky, Stephen Shiboski, Jennifer L Barton, Karla L Miller, Holly A Mitchell, Jo Dana, Kimberly Reiter, Elizabeth Wahl, Karine Rozenberg-Ben-Dror, Ronald G Hauser, Mary A Whooley","doi":"10.1111/1475-6773.14363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop, deploy, and evaluate a national, electronic health record (EHR)-based dashboard to support safe prescribing of biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying agents (b/tsDMARDs) in the United States Veterans Affairs Healthcare System (VA).</p><p><strong>Data sources and study setting: </strong>We extracted and displayed hepatitis B (HBV), hepatitis C (HCV), and tuberculosis (TB) screening data from the EHR for users of b/tsDMARDs using PowerBI (Microsoft) and deployed the dashboard to VA facilities across the United States in 2022; we observed facilities for 44 weeks post-deployment.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We examined the association between dashboard engagement by healthcare personnel and the percentage of patients with all screenings complete (HBV, HCV, and TB) at the facility level using an interrupted time series. Based on frequency of sessions, facilities were grouped into high- and low/none-engagement categories. We modeled changes in complete screening pre- and post-deployment of the dashboard.</p><p><strong>Data collection methods: </strong>All VA facilities were eligible for inclusion; excluded facilities participated in design of the dashboard or had <20 patients receiving b/tsDMARDs. Session counts from facility personnel were captured using PowerBI audit log data. Outcomes were assessed weekly based on EHR data extracted via the dashboard itself.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>Totally 117 facilities (serving a total of 41,224 Veterans prescribed b/tsDMARDs) were included. Before dashboard deployment, across all facilities, 61.5% of patients had all screenings complete, which improved to 66.3% over the course of the study period. The largest improvement (15 percentage points, 60.3%-75.3%) occurred among facilities with high engagement (post-intervention difference in outcome between high and low/none-engagement groups was 0.17 percentage points (pp) per week, 95% confidence interval (0.04 pp, 0.30 pp); p = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We observed significant improvements in screening for latent infections among facilities with high engagement with the dashboard, compared with those with fewer sessions.</p>","PeriodicalId":55065,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.14363","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To develop, deploy, and evaluate a national, electronic health record (EHR)-based dashboard to support safe prescribing of biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying agents (b/tsDMARDs) in the United States Veterans Affairs Healthcare System (VA).

Data sources and study setting: We extracted and displayed hepatitis B (HBV), hepatitis C (HCV), and tuberculosis (TB) screening data from the EHR for users of b/tsDMARDs using PowerBI (Microsoft) and deployed the dashboard to VA facilities across the United States in 2022; we observed facilities for 44 weeks post-deployment.

Study design: We examined the association between dashboard engagement by healthcare personnel and the percentage of patients with all screenings complete (HBV, HCV, and TB) at the facility level using an interrupted time series. Based on frequency of sessions, facilities were grouped into high- and low/none-engagement categories. We modeled changes in complete screening pre- and post-deployment of the dashboard.

Data collection methods: All VA facilities were eligible for inclusion; excluded facilities participated in design of the dashboard or had <20 patients receiving b/tsDMARDs. Session counts from facility personnel were captured using PowerBI audit log data. Outcomes were assessed weekly based on EHR data extracted via the dashboard itself.

Principal findings: Totally 117 facilities (serving a total of 41,224 Veterans prescribed b/tsDMARDs) were included. Before dashboard deployment, across all facilities, 61.5% of patients had all screenings complete, which improved to 66.3% over the course of the study period. The largest improvement (15 percentage points, 60.3%-75.3%) occurred among facilities with high engagement (post-intervention difference in outcome between high and low/none-engagement groups was 0.17 percentage points (pp) per week, 95% confidence interval (0.04 pp, 0.30 pp); p = 0.01).

Conclusions: We observed significant improvements in screening for latent infections among facilities with high engagement with the dashboard, compared with those with fewer sessions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在退伍军人健康管理局内,在全国范围内推广药物安全仪表板,以改进生物制剂和靶向合成疾病调节剂使用者的潜伏感染检测。
目的开发、部署并评估基于电子病历(EHR)的全国性仪表板,以支持美国退伍军人事务医疗保健系统(VA)中生物制剂和靶向合成疾病调节药(b/tsDMARDs)的安全处方:我们使用PowerBI(微软)从电子病历中提取并显示了乙型肝炎(HBV)、丙型肝炎(HCV)和肺结核(TB)筛查数据,并在2022年将仪表板部署到美国各地的退伍军人事务部设施中;我们对部署后的设施进行了为期44周的观察:研究设计:我们使用间断时间序列研究了医护人员参与仪表板与设施层面完成所有筛查(HBV、HCV 和 TB)的患者比例之间的关联。根据会议频率,医疗机构被分为高参与度和低参与度/无参与度两类。我们模拟了仪表板部署前后完整筛查的变化情况:所有退伍军人机构均符合纳入条件;未纳入的机构参与了仪表板的设计或有主要发现:共纳入了 117 家机构(共为 41,224 名退伍军人开具了 b/tsDMARDs 处方)。在部署仪表板之前,所有机构中有 61.5% 的患者完成了所有筛查,在研究期间,这一比例提高到 66.3%。参与度高的机构的改善幅度最大(15 个百分点,60.3%-75.3%)(干预后参与度高和参与度低/无参与度组之间的结果差异为每周 0.17 个百分点,95% 置信区间(0.04 个百分点,0.30 个百分点);P = 0.01):我们观察到,与参与次数较少的机构相比,参与度高的机构在潜伏感染筛查方面有明显改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Services Research
Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Services Research (HSR) is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that provides researchers and public and private policymakers with the latest research findings, methods, and concepts related to the financing, organization, delivery, evaluation, and outcomes of health services. Rated as one of the top journals in the fields of health policy and services and health care administration, HSR publishes outstanding articles reporting the findings of original investigations that expand knowledge and understanding of the wide-ranging field of health care and that will help to improve the health of individuals and communities.
期刊最新文献
International comparison of hospitalizations and emergency department visits related to mental health conditions across high-income countries before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Aligning quality improvement, research, and health system goals using the QUERI priority-setting process: A step forward in creating a learning health system. Bridging borders: Current trends and future directions in comparative health systems research. Hospital-physician integration and Medicare spending: Evidence from stable angina. Health system resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic: A comparative analysis of disruptions in care from 32 countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1