Utilizing endophytic plant growth-promoting bacteria and the nematophagous fungus Purpureocillium lilacinum as biocontrol agents against the root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) on tomato plants

IF 1.7 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY European Journal of Plant Pathology Pub Date : 2024-07-24 DOI:10.1007/s10658-024-02907-z
Abdelhadi A. I. Ali, Samir A. Mahgoub, Atef F. Ahmed, Walid F. A. Mosa, Mohamed T. El-Saadony, Mazhar D. A. Mohamed, Maryam M. Alomran, Hawazen K. Al-Gheffari, Khaled A. El-Tarabily, Synan F. AbuQamar, Ramadan M. El-Ashry
{"title":"Utilizing endophytic plant growth-promoting bacteria and the nematophagous fungus Purpureocillium lilacinum as biocontrol agents against the root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) on tomato plants","authors":"Abdelhadi A. I. Ali, Samir A. Mahgoub, Atef F. Ahmed, Walid F. A. Mosa, Mohamed T. El-Saadony, Mazhar D. A. Mohamed, Maryam M. Alomran, Hawazen K. Al-Gheffari, Khaled A. El-Tarabily, Synan F. AbuQamar, Ramadan M. El-Ashry","doi":"10.1007/s10658-024-02907-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The present investigation was designed to assess how administering biocontrol agents (BCAs) made from the nematophagous endophytic fungus MR20 (<i>Purpureocillium lilacinum</i>) or a mixture of endophytic plant growth-promoting bacteria MR12 (<i>Pseudomonas fluorescens</i>), and MR25 (<i>Serratia marcescens</i>), could enhance tomato growth and resistance to <i>Meloidogyne incognita</i> under <i>in vivo</i> conditions. The three strains’ cell-free culture filtrates showed a strong nematocidal impact (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.05) on <i>M. incognita</i> infective second-stage juveniles (J2s). The highest mortality rates by the three BCAs were at concentrations of 80%, followed by 60%, 40%, and 20%. The <i>in vitro</i> hatching of free eggs was found to be considerably (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.05) reduced as the concentrations of the endophytic bacteria MR12, and MR25 were increased in the order 1 × 10<sup>5</sup>, 1 × 10<sup>6</sup>, 1 × 10<sup>7</sup>, 0.5 × 10<sup>8</sup>, to 1 × 10<sup>8</sup> colony forming units (CFU)/mL, and the maximum nematicidal activity in killing <i>M. incognita</i> free eggs occurred at 1 × 10<sup>8</sup> CFU/mL. A statistically significant (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.05) reduction in the percentage of <i>M. incognita</i>-free eggs retrieved was seen <i>in vitro</i> when various concentrations of the endophytic fungus MR20 were applied compared to the negative control (distilled water). The endophytic fungus MR20 had the highest nematicidal activity against <i>M. incognita</i> free eggs at a concentration of 3 × 10<sup>6</sup> CFU/mL. The application of <i>P. lilacinum</i> or a combination of <i>P. fluorescens</i> and <i>S. marcescens</i> to tomato plants in the presence of <i>M. incognita</i> under greenhouse conditions resulted in a significant increase (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.05) in root and shoot fresh weight, number of leaves, weight of leaves, and stem diameter when compared to the positive control treatment that contained only <i>M. incognita</i>. Treatment with <i>P. lilacinum</i> was more effective (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.05) than <i>P. fluorescens</i> and <i>S. marcescens</i> in reducing egg masses per root, J2s per 100 g of soil, egg masses per 100 g of soil, J2s + eggs of <i>M. incognita</i> per 100 g of soil, reproduction factor, and reduction percentage after 60 days under greenhouse conditions. Nevertheless, the reduction of <i>M. incognita</i> gall size categorization (&gt; 4 mm, 2–4 mm, and &lt; 2 mm) was more effectively achieved by treatment with <i>P. fluorescens</i> and <i>S. marcescens</i> than by treatment with <i>P. lilacinum</i>. Under <i>in vivo</i> conditions, the tested <i>P. lilacinum</i> or a mixture of <i>P. fluorescens</i> and <i>S. marcescens</i> effectively controlled nematode population densities below the economic threshold.</p>","PeriodicalId":12052,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Plant Pathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Plant Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-024-02907-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present investigation was designed to assess how administering biocontrol agents (BCAs) made from the nematophagous endophytic fungus MR20 (Purpureocillium lilacinum) or a mixture of endophytic plant growth-promoting bacteria MR12 (Pseudomonas fluorescens), and MR25 (Serratia marcescens), could enhance tomato growth and resistance to Meloidogyne incognita under in vivo conditions. The three strains’ cell-free culture filtrates showed a strong nematocidal impact (P < 0.05) on M. incognita infective second-stage juveniles (J2s). The highest mortality rates by the three BCAs were at concentrations of 80%, followed by 60%, 40%, and 20%. The in vitro hatching of free eggs was found to be considerably (P < 0.05) reduced as the concentrations of the endophytic bacteria MR12, and MR25 were increased in the order 1 × 105, 1 × 106, 1 × 107, 0.5 × 108, to 1 × 108 colony forming units (CFU)/mL, and the maximum nematicidal activity in killing M. incognita free eggs occurred at 1 × 108 CFU/mL. A statistically significant (P < 0.05) reduction in the percentage of M. incognita-free eggs retrieved was seen in vitro when various concentrations of the endophytic fungus MR20 were applied compared to the negative control (distilled water). The endophytic fungus MR20 had the highest nematicidal activity against M. incognita free eggs at a concentration of 3 × 106 CFU/mL. The application of P. lilacinum or a combination of P. fluorescens and S. marcescens to tomato plants in the presence of M. incognita under greenhouse conditions resulted in a significant increase (P < 0.05) in root and shoot fresh weight, number of leaves, weight of leaves, and stem diameter when compared to the positive control treatment that contained only M. incognita. Treatment with P. lilacinum was more effective (P < 0.05) than P. fluorescens and S. marcescens in reducing egg masses per root, J2s per 100 g of soil, egg masses per 100 g of soil, J2s + eggs of M. incognita per 100 g of soil, reproduction factor, and reduction percentage after 60 days under greenhouse conditions. Nevertheless, the reduction of M. incognita gall size categorization (> 4 mm, 2–4 mm, and < 2 mm) was more effectively achieved by treatment with P. fluorescens and S. marcescens than by treatment with P. lilacinum. Under in vivo conditions, the tested P. lilacinum or a mixture of P. fluorescens and S. marcescens effectively controlled nematode population densities below the economic threshold.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用内生植物生长促进菌和食线虫真菌紫丁香菌作为生物防治剂,防治番茄植株上的根结线虫(Meloidogyne incognita)。
本研究旨在评估在体内条件下施用由食线虫内生真菌 MR20(紫云英真菌)或内生植物生长促进菌 MR12(荧光假单胞菌)和 MR25(肉质沙雷氏菌)混合物制成的生物控制剂(BCA)如何提高西红柿的生长和对 Meloidogyne incognita 的抗性。这三种菌株的无细胞培养滤液对 M. incognita 感染的第二阶段幼虫(J2s)有很强的杀线虫作用(P < 0.05)。浓度为 80% 时,三种 BCAs 的死亡率最高,其次是 60%、40% 和 20%。随着内生细菌 MR12 和 MR25 的浓度按 1 × 105、1 × 106、1 × 107、0.5 × 108 到 1 × 108 菌落总数形成单位(CFU)/毫升的顺序增加,游离卵的体外孵化率显著降低(P < 0.05),杀灭 M. incognita 游离卵的最大杀线虫活性出现在 1 × 108 菌落总数形成单位/毫升时。与阴性对照组(蒸馏水)相比,在体外施用不同浓度的内生真菌 MR20 时,无 M. incognita虫卵的回收率出现了统计学意义上的显著下降(P < 0.05)。当内生真菌 MR20 的浓度为 3 × 106 CFU/mL 时,它对 M. incognita 游离卵的杀线虫活性最高。在温室条件下,在有 M. incognita 存在的番茄植株上施用 P. lilacinum 或 P. fluorescens 和 S. marcescens 的组合,与只含有 M. incognita 的阳性对照处理相比,根和芽的鲜重、叶片数、叶片重量和茎的直径都有显著增加(P < 0.05)。在温室条件下,60 天后,在减少每根卵块、每 100 克土壤中的 J2s、每 100 克土壤中的卵块、每 100 克土壤中的 J2s + M. incognita 的卵、繁殖系数和减少率方面,用 P. lilacinum 处理比 P. fluorescens 和 S. marcescens 更有效(P <0.05)。然而,与 P. lilacinum 相比,使用 P. fluorescens 和 S. marcescens 处理更能有效减少 M. incognita 的虫瘿大小分类(> 4 mm、2-4 mm 和 < 2 mm)。在体内条件下,经测试的 P. lilacinum 或 P. fluorescens 与 S. marcescens 的混合物可有效控制线虫种群密度,使其低于经济阈值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Plant Pathology
European Journal of Plant Pathology 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
183
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Plant Pathology is an international journal publishing original articles in English dealing with fundamental and applied aspects of plant pathology; considering disease in agricultural and horticultural crops, forestry, and in natural plant populations. The types of articles published are :Original Research at the molecular, physiological, whole-plant and population levels; Mini-reviews on topics which are timely and of global rather than national or regional significance; Short Communications for important research findings that can be presented in an abbreviated format; and Letters-to-the-Editor, where these raise issues related to articles previously published in the journal. Submissions relating to disease vector biology and integrated crop protection are welcome. However, routine screenings of plant protection products, varietal trials for disease resistance, and biological control agents are not published in the journal unless framed in the context of strategic approaches to disease management.
期刊最新文献
Non-coding RNAs and their role in enhancing virus resistance in plants Plants as an alternative to the use of chemicals for crop protection against biotic threats: trends and future perspectives Using in silico analysis to investigate the false positive potential of qPCR systems for potato disease diagnosis Pseudoplagiostoma perseae sp. nov. causes leaf spot disease on avocado leaves in Taiwan Evaluation of Iranian Dragon’s Head landraces for resistance to prevalent diseases in the field and glasshouse conditions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1