Geospatial based AHP analysis for habitat suitability of elephants and the effects of human elephant conflict in a tropical forest of Western Ghats in India

IF 1.8 3区 生物学 Q3 ECOLOGY European Journal of Wildlife Research Pub Date : 2024-07-23 DOI:10.1007/s10344-024-01834-y
P. Vineetha, S. Sarun, S. Selvakumar, Reghunath Rajesh
{"title":"Geospatial based AHP analysis for habitat suitability of elephants and the effects of human elephant conflict in a tropical forest of Western Ghats in India","authors":"P. Vineetha, S. Sarun, S. Selvakumar, Reghunath Rajesh","doi":"10.1007/s10344-024-01834-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In Kerala, human-elephant conflicts (HEC) are reported in almost all parts of the Western Ghats region, exceptionally high in Wayanad. In recent years, there has been a notable surge in HEC occurrences throughout the state, leading to the loss of property, animals, and life. The dependency of humans on enclosures, the transformation of natural areas into plantations, and the fragmentation of natural ecosystems are the main reasons for the escalating conflict between people and elephants. As a result, it is necessary to study the suitability of habitat for elephants and ensure their conservation. The study aims to identify suitable elephant habitats in the Wayanad Wildlife Sanctuary using geospatial data based on their known association with environmental variables. This study employs the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), an approach to determining the weightings of individual parameters in assessing habitat suitability. The analysis findings indicated that the central portion of the study area within the Sultan Bathery (43.63 sq. km), range represents the most suitable area for elephant habitat followed by Kurichat (33.59 sq. km) and Tholpetti (19.45 sq. km). The final output of the study, the Habitat Suitability Map was validated by adding the human-elephant conflict locational data, which illustrates that the Kurichiat range recorded the highest HEC conflict (50%), followed by Muthanga (29%), Sulthan Bathery (12%), and Tholpetti (9%). The map could assist in managing, conserving, and protecting forest resources and aid in decision-making activities.</p>","PeriodicalId":51044,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Wildlife Research","volume":"245 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Wildlife Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-024-01834-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Kerala, human-elephant conflicts (HEC) are reported in almost all parts of the Western Ghats region, exceptionally high in Wayanad. In recent years, there has been a notable surge in HEC occurrences throughout the state, leading to the loss of property, animals, and life. The dependency of humans on enclosures, the transformation of natural areas into plantations, and the fragmentation of natural ecosystems are the main reasons for the escalating conflict between people and elephants. As a result, it is necessary to study the suitability of habitat for elephants and ensure their conservation. The study aims to identify suitable elephant habitats in the Wayanad Wildlife Sanctuary using geospatial data based on their known association with environmental variables. This study employs the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), an approach to determining the weightings of individual parameters in assessing habitat suitability. The analysis findings indicated that the central portion of the study area within the Sultan Bathery (43.63 sq. km), range represents the most suitable area for elephant habitat followed by Kurichat (33.59 sq. km) and Tholpetti (19.45 sq. km). The final output of the study, the Habitat Suitability Map was validated by adding the human-elephant conflict locational data, which illustrates that the Kurichiat range recorded the highest HEC conflict (50%), followed by Muthanga (29%), Sulthan Bathery (12%), and Tholpetti (9%). The map could assist in managing, conserving, and protecting forest resources and aid in decision-making activities.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度西高止山热带森林中大象栖息地适宜性和人象冲突影响的基于地理空间的 AHP 分析
在喀拉拉邦,西高止山脉的几乎所有地区都有人象冲突(HEC)的报道,尤其是在瓦尼亚德。近年来,喀拉拉邦各地发生的人象冲突明显增多,导致财产、动物和生命损失。人类对围栏的依赖、自然区域变成种植园以及自然生态系统的破碎化是人象冲突不断升级的主要原因。因此,有必要研究大象栖息地的适宜性,确保对大象的保护。本研究旨在根据已知的大象栖息地与环境变量之间的关联,利用地理空间数据确定韦瓦纳德野生动物保护区内大象的适宜栖息地。本研究采用了层次分析法(AHP),这是一种在评估栖息地适宜性时确定单个参数权重的方法。分析结果表明,苏丹巴特里(43.63 平方公里)范围内的研究区域中部是最适合大象栖息的地区,其次是库里查特(33.59 平方公里)和托尔佩蒂(19.45 平方公里)。研究的最终成果--栖息地适宜性地图通过添加人象冲突定位数据进行了验证,结果表明库里夏特地区的人象冲突最高(50%),其次是穆坦加(29%)、苏尔坦巴特里(12%)和托尔佩蒂(9%)。该地图有助于管理、养护和保护森林资源,并有助于决策活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: European Journal of Wildlife Research focuses on all aspects of wildlife biology. Main areas are: applied wildlife ecology; diseases affecting wildlife population dynamics, conservation, economy or public health; ecotoxicology; management for conservation, hunting or pest control; population genetics; and the sustainable use of wildlife as a natural resource. Contributions to socio-cultural aspects of human-wildlife relationships and to the history and sociology of hunting will also be considered.
期刊最新文献
Hunting bag statistics of wild mammals in Portugal (1989–2022): on the need to improve data report and compilation Observation of threatened pinyon jays Gymnorhinus cyanocephalus in the EU pet market as a potential additional threat Dietary differences in males and females of a strongly sexually dimorphic ungulate Understanding the patterns and predictors of human-elephant conflict in Tamil Nadu, India Two neotropical spotted felids in the Nevado de Toluca Volcano? The highest altitude records
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1