Bridging governance gaps: politically connected boards, gender diversity and the ESG performance puzzle in Iberian companies

IF 4.5 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Business Process Management Journal Pub Date : 2024-07-26 DOI:10.1108/bpmj-01-2024-0039
Rui Guedes, Maria Elisabete Neves, Elisabete Vieira
{"title":"Bridging governance gaps: politically connected boards, gender diversity and the ESG performance puzzle in Iberian companies","authors":"Rui Guedes, Maria Elisabete Neves, Elisabete Vieira","doi":"10.1108/bpmj-01-2024-0039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>The main goal of this paper is to analyse the impact of political connections and gender diversity shaping Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) components’ effects on the performance of Iberian companies.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p> To achieve this aim, we have used panel data methodology, specifically the generalized method of moments system estimation method by Arellano and Bond (1991), using data from listed Iberian companies for the period between 2015 and 2020.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Our findings suggest that, although ESG components positively influence company performance, the presence of political connections weakens ESG commitments, compromising ethical standards and suggesting a lack of transparency or inadequate regulations. Our results also highlight that the presence of women on boards of directors has a nuanced impact on firm performance, as measured by the Market-to-Book ratio. While gender diversity interacts with ESG scores, external investors' perceptions may not always reflect immediate performance improvements.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>This work faces some limitations associated with challenges in securing comprehensive data for all variables, along with the complexity of acquiring information about political connections. Often, we had to rely on multiple sources and cross-reference the data to enhance its reliability. Another limitation for potential consideration or exploration in future research pertains to the omission of distinct industry sectors due to the limited number of companies, particularly notable in the context of Portugal.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>Although there is a large volume of literature on the relationship between ESG and companies’ performance, as far as the authors are aware, this article is original and covers an important gap in the literature when considering political connections and board gender diversity impact on ESG components as determinants of the performance of Iberian companies.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47964,"journal":{"name":"Business Process Management Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Process Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/bpmj-01-2024-0039","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The main goal of this paper is to analyse the impact of political connections and gender diversity shaping Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) components’ effects on the performance of Iberian companies.

Design/methodology/approach

To achieve this aim, we have used panel data methodology, specifically the generalized method of moments system estimation method by Arellano and Bond (1991), using data from listed Iberian companies for the period between 2015 and 2020.

Findings

Our findings suggest that, although ESG components positively influence company performance, the presence of political connections weakens ESG commitments, compromising ethical standards and suggesting a lack of transparency or inadequate regulations. Our results also highlight that the presence of women on boards of directors has a nuanced impact on firm performance, as measured by the Market-to-Book ratio. While gender diversity interacts with ESG scores, external investors' perceptions may not always reflect immediate performance improvements.

Research limitations/implications

This work faces some limitations associated with challenges in securing comprehensive data for all variables, along with the complexity of acquiring information about political connections. Often, we had to rely on multiple sources and cross-reference the data to enhance its reliability. Another limitation for potential consideration or exploration in future research pertains to the omission of distinct industry sectors due to the limited number of companies, particularly notable in the context of Portugal.

Originality/value

Although there is a large volume of literature on the relationship between ESG and companies’ performance, as far as the authors are aware, this article is original and covers an important gap in the literature when considering political connections and board gender diversity impact on ESG components as determinants of the performance of Iberian companies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
弥合治理差距:伊比利亚公司中与政治有关联的董事会、性别多样性和环境、社会和治理绩效之谜
目的本文的主要目的是分析政治关系和性别多样性对环境、社会和治理(ESG)要素对伊比利亚公司业绩的影响。为实现这一目的,我们使用了面板数据方法,特别是 Arellano 和 Bond(1991 年)提出的广义矩系统估计方法,并使用了伊比利亚上市公司 2015 年至 2020 年期间的数据。研究结果我们的研究结果表明,尽管环境、社会和公司治理要素对公司业绩有积极影响,但政治关系的存在会削弱环境、社会和公司治理承诺,损害道德标准,并表明缺乏透明度或监管不力。我们的研究结果还突显了董事会中女性的存在对公司业绩(以市账率衡量)的细微影响。虽然性别多样性与环境、社会和公司治理得分相互影响,但外部投资者的看法可能并不总能反映出公司业绩的直接改善。通常情况下,我们不得不依赖多种来源的数据,并对数据进行交叉比对,以提高数据的可靠性。另一个需要在未来研究中考虑或探讨的局限性是,由于公司数量有限,我们忽略了不同的行业领域,这在葡萄牙的情况下尤为明显。 原创性/价值虽然有大量文献涉及 ESG 与公司业绩之间的关系,但就作者所知,本文是原创性的,在考虑政治关系和董事会性别多样性对 ESG 要素的影响作为伊比利亚公司业绩的决定因素时,本文填补了文献中的一个重要空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
9.80%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: Business processes are a fundamental building block of organizational success. Even though effectively managing business process is a key activity for business prosperity, there remain considerable gaps in understanding how to drive efficiency through a process approach. Building a clear and deep understanding of the range process, how they function, and how to manage them is the major challenge facing modern business. Business Process Management Journal (BPMJ) examines how a variety of business processes intrinsic to organizational efficiency and effectiveness are integrated and managed for competitive success. BPMJ builds a deep appreciation of how to manage business processes effectively by disseminating best practice. Coverage includes: BPM in eBusiness, eCommerce and eGovernment Web-based enterprise application integration eBPM, ERP, CRM, ASP & SCM Knowledge management and learning organization Methodologies, techniques and tools of business process modeling, analysis and design Techniques of moving from one-shot business process re-engineering to continuous improvement Best practices in BPM Performance management Tools and techniques of change management BPM case studies.
期刊最新文献
A dynamic, two-way, individual-level, process-oriented framework for emergent leadership: modeling lateral influence in teams A dynamic, two-way, individual-level, process-oriented framework for emergent leadership: modeling lateral influence in teams Unpacking the black box between market culture and innovation performance: the role of absorptive capacity and resistance to change Mapping the risks in technology integration for sustainable outcomes Mapping the way to a dark green enterprise: fuzzy cognitive map based analysis of factors affecting environmental performance for sustainable development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1